Download Could Have Been Better

I'm a long-time fan of the franchise, but wow. I'm so disappointed with the results. I feel like with the source material, it could have been done way differently instead of all the clich and predictable parts.

The movie should have been about Mike's little brother being the victim of the bite, how Mike was the one that led to it happening and how his time working at Freddy's helps him both overcome the grief while discovering the mystery behind the deaths of each child for each anamatronic instead of him having the same dream in the woods each night, each dream should have showcased the death of each child and given a hit as to who was behind it all.

Download File 🔥 https://bltlly.com/2y3heN 🔥

While coach Robert Saleh said he had no regrets even though he lost Rodgers to an Achilles injury on the fourth play of the season, he conceded Monday the team could've done a better job of adjusting without Rodgers.

"Could we have done things better? I'm talking about myself and the coaching staff, with regards to, 'All right, this is our worst-case scenario, now what?' Absolutely, and it's something that we will make sure that we do a heck of a lot better with in 2024."

Well, while I do think TDI is the best season, I do think it does have its issues, and a few things that could have made it a bit better. Remember, the point of this series is to tweak the actual season, but keep a lot of the plot points the same, and not completely rearrange the entire season, since this is my opinion on who it could have been better.

1. More thought out, detailed, and logical eliminations.

Hux was a child soldier, raised under the training and scrutiny of his father but also Captain Phasma and Rae Sloane. He also would know that having a small faction within the First Order that was loyal to him might be beneficial. Galius Rex understood that when he planned to take child soldiers Brendol had trained into the unknown regions before Rae Sloane killed him. What if Hux had cultivated a loyal group of troopers and officers and turned on Pryde instead? Then took a few ships and escaped. It would leave a thread open and another villain out in the galaxy, waiting to return. It might feel repetitive but that is the story of war: you defeat an enemy and, after a while, the enemy reinvents itself and tries again. And on and on it goes. Plus, Hux would complete the prophecy he proclaimed to Brooks of outliving everyone and this would give a compelling post-The Rise of Skywalker storyline to the heroes of the Resistance. Rogue Squadron is rumored to be taking place either during or post-Sequel trilogy. It would have been cool the main plot revolved around hunting down escaped First Order in the unknown regions to take them out immediately, not repeating the mistakes of the New Republic after the fall of the Empire. Even in one film, it could have conveyed the dangerousness of having a desperate remaining faction, led by a desperate leader backed into a corner. And it would be contained within one movie, a swan song for General Hux since he was denied a proper one in The Rise of Skywalker.

Since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic first began, strategies to minimize spread of the virus in the community have been employed but often not early, extensive or effective enough to prevent multiple hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths. Thus, as the pandemic continues, we, as intensivists, need to be constantly evaluating and reevaluating our response, to review what we have learned, what we have accomplished so far, what we have done well and, perhaps more importantly, what we could have done better.

Of course, with hindsight we could, and indeed should, have been better prepared. Methods to ensure sufficient adequately trained personnel, enough appropriately equipped ICU beds, and adequate amounts of material -from personal protective equipment to ventilators- could all have been better planned and potential alternative supply chains already identified. Plans should have been established to enable transport of patients to hospitals in areas of the country that were less badly affected, or even across international borders. Many countries now have a central distribution system in place ensuring an even spread of patients. Importantly, the provision of on-going psychological support for all those involved in the COVID pandemic -staff, patients and families- should have been foreseen and readily available, personalized to individual requirements.

We have made substantial progress in our understanding of the pathophysiological alterations associated with COVID-19, particularly that the disease is not limited to the respiratory tract and altered lung function, but affects all organs. Identification of the associated endotheliopathy and coagulopathy [4] and documentation of the virus in virtually all organs [5] have helped us appreciate that the whole body is involved and not just the lungs. As a result, management has improved substantially with less use of invasive mechanical ventilation and more effective thrombosis prophylaxis. Mortality rates have also decreased, likely as a result of the improved understanding of the disease process and better patient management [6].

However, we may have made more progress in specific treatments if we had explored the effects of (old and) new therapeutic interventions more carefully. With pressure to identify effective treatments and the feeling that something had to be done to help save lives, we tried too many drugs without testing them rigorously. Results from RECOVERY, SOLIDARITY and REMAP-CAP adaptive research platforms have since demonstrated that many of our initial assumptions were wrong and did not bring any benefit [7, 8]. One example is in the early studies on hydroxychloroquine, results of which were published online without going through the usual rigorous, peer review process. The resultant initial enthusiasm for hydroxychloroquine, with its associated media hype and support from leading celebrities and political figures, became an obstacle to performing effective randomized controlled trials of the drug because high patient and family demand for it to be given limited our ability to randomize patients. This publicity also hampered trials assessing other interventions, because of the concern that the use of hydroxychloroquine could add noise to the trial. Another example is the drug remdesivir. Medical and pharmacoeconomic models were massively involved in propagating a therapy that was later shown not to be very effective, at least in severely ill patients [7]. As with many other aspects of management of this pandemic, international collaboration for clinical trials was poor and results could have been improved by using better structured, international platforms already early in the pandemic. Identification of the benefits of corticosteroid administration was one example of a well-run clinical trial [9]. However, as a result of early publication of preliminary results from the RECOVERY trial, other ongoing trials were stopped early, limiting full interpretation of the results from these later trials [10]. Importantly too, there are many other interventions that could and should be tested. For example, the endotheliopathy/coagulopathy may represent an excellent indication for substances like thrombomodulin [11]. There has also not been enough research on factors that influence susceptibility to severe manifestations of COVID-19 and the host response [12], although this may still come.

Wirth has a good point: At this moment, there may be no need to wrangle further over why the Rio text is so weak. In the end, the Rio text looks much more like a G-20 text, simply articulating the lowest common denominator among the parties. While activists may have hoped for more, this could be the most we could ask for in a process when an actual treaty is not on the table.

Still, how this text went wrong offers some interesting lessons. If we examine the development of the Rio text, we see that it could have been bolder if some parties had been allowed to strengthen it.

An important caveat to attributing responsibility for the watering down of the final text is that while the earlier text reveals what parties wanted inserted or taken out, it does not show what each party thought about every provision. A country would not have been able to articulate an objection if another country already registered a reservation. Still, absent additional evidence, a push for stronger support for the Sustainable Energy for All initiative would have delivered a better conclusion to the meeting.

Still, some of the more interesting additions to the text, which could have improved this process and staved off some criticism, were jettisoned last week in the push to find consensus early in the meeting. In the section on financing these new goals, for example, the United States moved in several places to modify the overwhelming reliance on public assistance common in the U.N. system. But the United States did offer an alternative in a proposed section on tax reform to help the poor:

Hey Wikiers, I am back with the TDAS edition, and I know it has been 4 months, but I am here to finish all of them. There are SO many issues with this season. The lack of consistency, abrupt storylines with terrible execution, stupidity, lack of focus, flanderization and derailment, contrivance, the cast, and just overall being bad. Here are a few things that could have changed this season for the better. I will say this again to remind people; the purpose of this is to FIX certain things of the season (though keeping most of the plots relatively the same, but small replacements and retweeking will lead to a bigger and better payoff). I will try my best with this season.

The trio, Sierra, and Sam are all getting along and bonding in the losers compartment, and Mike says he wants to take Zoey to the Craft services after to watch an indie movie. Sierra and Cameron makes predictions on the Heroes chances of winning and losing, an who could lose. Alejandro and Heather argue in the winner's compartment about last season, and Jo knows that Scott and Lightning are out to get her, so she tries to befriend Duncan and Gwen, who were in the middle of a discussion about their relationship, and her not being a villain. During the challenge, Sam gets caught in a bunch of booby traps, and Courtney is trying to get on the Heroes' good side, but she comes off as too bossy, turning everyone off. Jo continues to argue with Heather about leadership, and things get personal when they take shots at one another's looks, and who is the better villain, with Scott and Lightning joining to gang up on her. Mike and Zoey flirt as they work with one another, and Sierra and Cameron dig together. Alejandro is trying to come off as crippled and weak to get sympathy points from everyone, so they can forget about his Season 3 actions. Scott tries to sabotage the Heroes section, and Mike and Zoey catches him, causing the three to get into an altercation, and for Scott to knock Mike out with a shovel. Scott wants to be the biggest villain in the game. ff782bc1db