Book Chapters
112. Larsson, T., and D. Biber. in press. On the perils of linguistically opaque measures and methods: Toward increased transparency and linguistic interpretability. In P. Crosthwaite (ed.), Corpora for language learning: Bridging the research-practice divide, pp. 131-139. Taylor and Francis.
111. Biber, D., S. Wizner, and R. Reppen. forthcoming. The President wide awake at 3:14 AM tweeting about CNN: Informational non-canonical reduced structures in TV News Broadcasts. In S. Leuckert and T. Pham (Eds.), Non-Canonical English Syntax: Concepts, Methods, and Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. Fahy, M., J. Egbert, B. Szmrescanyi, and D. Biber. 2022. Comparing logistic regression, multinomial regression, classification trees and random forests applied to ternary variables: Three-way genitive variation in English. In O. Schützler and J. Schlüter (eds.), Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics Comparative Approaches, pp. 194-223. Cambridge: CUP.
109. Biber, D., J. Egbert, D. Keller, S. Wizner. 2021. Extending text-linguistic studies of register variation to a continuous situational space: Case studies from the web and natural conversation. In Seaone and Biber (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation, pp. 19-49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
108. Egbert, J., and D. Biber. 2020. It’s just words folks. It’s just words: Donald Trump’s distinctive linguistic style. In M. Eitelmann and U. Schneider (eds.), Linguistic inquiries into Donald Trump’s language: From ‘fake news’ to ‘tremendous success’, pp. 17-40. London: Bloomsbury.
107. Biber, D., and J. Egbert. 2020. Orality on the searchable web: A comparison of involved web registers and face-to-face conversation. In E. Jonsson and T. Larsson (eds.), Voices of the past and present – studies of involved, speech-related and spoken texts, pp. 315-334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
106. Gray, B., and D. Biber. 2020. Corpus-based discourse analysis. In K. Hyland and B. Paltridge (eds.) The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, pp. ???. London: Continuum.
105. Biber, D. 2019. Multi-dimensional analysis: A historical synopsis. In M. Veirano Pinto and T. Berber-Sardinha (eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues, pp. 11-26. Bloomsbury.
104. Biber, D., and B. Gray. 2019. Are law reports an ‘agile’ or an ‘uptight’ register? Tracking patterns of historical change in the use of colloquial and complexity features. In T. Fanego and P. Rodríguez-Puente (eds.), Corpus-based research on variation in English legal discourse, pp. 149-170. John Benjamins.
103. Biber, D., J. Egbert, and M. Zhang. 2018. Lexis and grammar as complementary discourse systems for expressing stance and evaluation. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds.), The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction, pp. 201-226. John Benjamins.
102. Biber, D., J. Egbert, and M. Zhang. 2018. Using corpus-based analysis to study register and dialect variation on the searchable web. In E. Friginal (ed.), Studies in Corpus-Based Sociolinguistics, pp. 83-111. Routledge.
101. Biber, D., J. Egbert, B. Gray, R. Oppliger and B. Szmrecsanyi. 2016. Variationist versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: nominal modifiers of head nouns. In Merja Kytö and Päivi Pahta (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, pp. 351-375. Cambridge University Press.
100. Friginal, Eric, and D. Biber. 2016. Multi-Dimensional Analysis. In Paul Baker and Jesse Egbert (eds.), Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus-linguistic research, pp. 73-89. Routledge.
99. Biber, D., and Jesse Egbert. 2016. Towards a User-based Taxonomy of Web Registers. In C. Schubert and C. Sanchez-Stockhammer (eds.), Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English (TiEL 90). Mouton de Gruyter.
98. Staples, S. and D. Biber. 2015. Cluster analysis. In L. Plonsky (ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research, pp. 243-274. London: Routledge.
97. Egbert, J., Staples, S., and D. Biber. 2015. Corpus research. In J.D. Brown and C. Coombe (eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, pp. 119-126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Gray, B., and D. Biber. 2015. Phraseology. In D. Biber and R. Reppen (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, pp. 125-145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Biber, D, and R. Reppen. 2015. Introduction. In D. Biber and R. Reppen (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, pp. 1-8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94. Gray, B., and D. Biber. 2014. Stance markers. In K. Aijmer and C. Rühlemann (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, pp. 219-248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Biber, D. 2014. Multi-dimensional analysis: A personal history. In: Tony Berber Sardinha and Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber, pp. XXIX-XXXVIII. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
92. Staples, S., and D. Biber. 2014. The expression of stance in nurse-patient interactions: An ESP perspective. In M. Gotti and D.S. Giannoni (eds.), Corpus analysis for descriptive and pedagogical purposes: ESP perspectives, pp. 123-142. Bern: Peter Lang.
91. Biber, D. 2014. The ubiquitous oral versus literate dimension: A survey of multidimensional studies. In J. Connor-Linton and L.W. Amoroso (eds.), Measured language: Quantitative studies of acquisition, assessment, and variation, pp. 1-20. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
90. Biber, D., and S. Staples. 2014. Exploring the prosody of stance: Variation in the realization of stance adverbials. In T. Raso and H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies, pp. 271-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
89. Biber, D. 2014. Representativeness in corpus design. In M. Bauer, A. Bicquelet and A. Suerdem (eds.), Textual Analysis. London: Sage. [Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
88. Gray, B., and D. Biber. 2013. Current conceptions of stance. In K. Hyland, K. and C. Sancho Guinda (eds.), Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, pp. 15-33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
87. Biber, D., and B. Gray. 2013. Identifying multi-dimensional patterns of variation across registers. In M. Krug and J. Schlüter (eds.), Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, pp. 402-420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Biber, D., and B. Gray. 2013. Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing. In B. Aarts and G. Leech (eds.), The English Verb Phrase: Corpus Methodology and Current Change, pp. 99-132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Biber, D., and Bethany Gray. 2012. The competing demands of popularization vs. economy: Written language in the age of mass literacy. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Traugott (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, pp. 314-328. Oxford University Press.
84. Gray, B., and D. Biber. 2012. The emergence and evolution of the pattern N + PREP + V-ing in historical scientific texts. In Moskowich, Isabel and Begoña Crespo (eds.), Astronomy 'playne and simple'. The writing of science between 1700 and 1900, pp. 181-198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
83. Biber, D. 2012. Register and discourse analysis. In J.P. Gee and M. Handford (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp 191-208. London: Routledge.
82. Biber, D. 2011. Speech and writing: Linguistic styles enabled by the technology of literacy. In G. Andersen and K. Aijmer (eds.), The Pragmatics of Society, pp. 137-152. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
81. Biber, D., and B. Gray. 2011. The historical shift of scientific academic prose in English towards less explicit styles of expression: Writing without verbs. In V. Bathia, P. Sánchez, and P. Perez-Paredes (eds.), Researching specialized languages, pp. 11-24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
80. Gray, B., D. Biber, and T. Hiltunen. 2011. The expression of stance in early (1665-1712) publications of the Philosophical Transactions and other contemporary medical prose. In I. Taavitsainen and P. Pahta (eds.), Medical Writing in Early Modern English, pp. 221-47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Gray, B., and D. Biber. 2011. Corpus approaches to the study of discourse. In K. Hyland and B. Paltridge (eds.) The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, pp. 138-54. London: Continuum.
78. Biber, D., S. Conrad, R. Reppen. 2011. Corpus-based approaches to issues in applied linguistics. In L. Wei (ed.), The Routledge Applied Linguistics Reader, pp. 185-201. London: Routledge. [Reprint of 1994 article in Applied Linguistics]
77. Biber, D., and Bethany Gray. 2011. Is conversation more grammatically complex than academic writing? In M. Konopka, J. Kubczak, C. Mair, F. Štícha, U.H. Waßner (eds.), Grammar and Corpora 2009, pp. 47-62. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
76. Biber, D., Bethany Gray, Alpo Honkapohja and Päivi Pahta. 2011. Prepositional modifiers in early English medical prose: A study ON their historical development IN noun phrases. In Päivi Pahta and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Communicating Early English Manuscripts, pp. 197-211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Grieve, J., D. Biber, E. Friginal, and T. Nekrasova. 2011. Variation among blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis. In Alexander Mehler, Serge Sharoff and Marina Santini (eds.), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies, pp. 303-322. Springer.
74. Biber, D. 2011. Register. In Patrick C. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, pp. 707-8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Biber, D., R. Reppen, and E. Friginal. 2010. Research in corpus linguistics. In Robert R. Kaplan (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics, pp. 548-570. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Biber, D. 2010. Multi-dimensional patterns of variation among university registers. In I. Hegedűs & S. Martsa (Eds.), CrosSections. Volume 1: Selected Papers in Linguistics from the 9th HUSSE Conference, pp. 191-213. Pécs, Hungary: Institute of English Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pécs.
71. Biber, D. 2010. What can a corpus tell us about registers and genres? In Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, pp. 241-254. Routledge.
70. Biber, D. 2010. Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, pp. 159-192. Oxford University Press.
69. Biber, D., Y. Kim, and N. Tracy-Ventura. 2010. A corpus-driven approach to comparative phraseology: Lexical bundles in English, Spanish, and Korean. In S. Iwasaki, H. Hoji, P. M. Clancy and S-O Sohn (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Volume 17, pp. 75-94. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
68. Biber, D. 2010. Linguistic styles enabled by the technology of literacy. In M. Moneglia & A Panunzi (eds.), Bootstrapping Information from Corpora in a Cross Linguistic Perspective, pp. 1-12. Firenze University Press.
67. Biber, D., and James K. Jones. 2009. Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 1286-1304. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
66. Biber, D. 2009. Multidimensional approaches. In Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 822-855. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
65. Biber, D. 2009. Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, 75-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Biber, D., J. Grieve, G. Iberri-Shea. 2009. Noun phrase modification. In G. Rohdenburg and J. Schlüter (eds.), One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, 182-193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Biber, D. 2008. Corpus-based analyses of discourse: Dimensions of variation in conversation. In Vijay K. Bhatia, John Flowerdew, and Rodney Jones (eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies, 100-114. London: Routledge.
62. Biber, D., and C. Vásquez. 2008. Writing and Speaking. In C. Bazerman (ed.), Handbook of research on writing, 535-548. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Biber, D., and N. Tracy-Ventura. 2007. Dimensions of register variation in Spanish. In G. Parodi (ed.), Working with Spanish corpora, 54-89. London: Continuum.
60. Tracy-Ventura, N., V. Cortes, and D. Biber. 2007. Lexical bundles in Spanish speech and writing. In G. Parodi (ed.), Working with Spanish corpora, 217-231. London: Continuum.
59. Biber, D. 2007. Representativeness in corpus design. In T. Fontenelle (Ed.), Practical lexicography: A reader, 63-88. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
58. Biber, D. 2007. Compressed noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In W. Teubert and R. Krishnamurthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. V), 130-141. London: Routledge. [Reprint of 2003 article in New media discourse]
57. Biber, D., S. Conrad, R. Reppen, P. Byrd, and M. Helt. 2007. Speaking and writing in the university: A multi-dimensional comparison. In W. Teubert and R. Krishnamurthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. V), 3-41. London: Routledge. [Reprint of 2002 article in TESOL Quarterly]
56. Biber, D. 2007. Representativeness in corpus design. In W. Teubert and R. Krishnamurthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. II), 134-165. London: Routledge. [Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
55. Biber, D. 2007. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies [Vol. 1], 127-157. London: Sage. [Reprint of 1992 article in Discourse Processes]
54. Biber, D., and J. Kurjian. 2007. Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, and C. Biewer (eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web, 109-132. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
53. Biber, D. 2006. Representativeness in corpus design. In McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York, NY: Routledge. [Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
52. Quaglio, P., and D. Biber. 2006. The grammar of conversation. In B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 692-723. Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Biber, D. 2006. Register: Overview. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd Ed.), Vol 10, 476-482. Oxford: Elsevier.
50. Biber, D. 2006. Corpus-based parsing and grammatical description. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd Ed.), Vol 9, 197-205. Oxford: Elsevier.
49. Conrad, S., and D. Biber. 2005. The Frequency and Use of Lexical Bundles in Conversation and Academic Prose. In W. Teubert & M. Mahlberg (eds.), The corpus approach to lexicography, Thematischer Teil von Lexicographica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Lexicographie, 20, 2004, 56-71.
48. Biber, D., E. Csomay, J.K. Jones, and C. Keck. 2004. A corpus linguistic investigation of vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In U. Connor and T. A. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-Dimensional Perspective, 53-72. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
47. Biber, D. 2004. Representativeness in corpus design. In G. Sampson and D. McCarthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Readings in a widening perspective, 174-97. London: Continuum. [Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
46. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 2004. Historical drift in three English genres. In G. Sampson and D. McCarthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Readings in a widening perspective, 67-77. London: Continuum. [Reprint of 1987 article in Kyto, Ihalainen, and Rissanen (eds.)]
45. Biber, D., and S. Conrad. 2004. Corpus-based comparisons of registers. In C. Coffin, A. Hewings, and K.A. O’Halloran (eds.), Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches, 40-56. London: Hodder Arnold.
44. Biber, D., E. Csomay, J.K. Jones, and C.M. Keck. 2004. Vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In A. Partington, J. Morley, and L. Haarman (eds.), Corpora and Discourse, 23-40. Bern: Peter Lang.
43. Keck, C.M. and D. Biber. 2004. Modal use in spoken and written university registers: A corpus-based study. In Roberta Facchinetti and Frank Palmer (eds.), English modality in perspective: Genre analysis and contrastive studies, 3-25. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
42. Biber, D. 2004. Lexical bundles in academic speech and writing. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), Practical applications in language corpora (PALC 2003), 165-78. Hamburg: Peter Lang.
41. Biber, D. 2004. Modal use across registers and time. In Anne Curzan and Kimberly Emmons (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II: Unfolding conversations, 189-216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
40. Biber, D., S. Conrad, V. Cortes. 2003. Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson, and Tony McEnery (eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 71-92. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
39. Biber, D. 2003. Variation among university spoken and written registers: A new multi-dimensional analysis. In Charles Meyer and Pepi Leistyna (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, 47-70. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
38. Biber, D. 2003. Compressed noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In J. Aitchison and D. Lewis (eds.), New media discourse. Routledge.
37. Biber, D. and V. Clark. 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In Teresa Fanego, Maria Jose Lopez-Couso, and Javier Perez-Guerra (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology, 43-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Biber, D., and S. Conrad. 2001. Register variation: A corpus approach. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 175-96. Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Finegan. E., and D. Biber. 2001. Register variation and social dialect variation: The register axiom. In Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 235-67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Biber, D. 2001. Dimensions of variation among 18th century registers. In H-J. Diller and M. Gorlach (eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genres, 89-110. Heidelberg: C. Winter. (Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (eds.) (2001) 200-214.)
33. Biber, D. 2001. Using corpus-based methods to investigate grammar and use: Some case studies on the use of verbs in English. In R. Simpson and J. Swales (eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America, 101-15. University of Michigan Press.
32. Biber, D., Randi Reppen, Victoria Clark, and Jenia Walter. 2001. Representing spoken language in university settings: The design and construction of the spoken component of the T2K-SWAL Corpus. In R. Simpson and J. Swales (eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America, 48-57. University of Michigan Press.
31. Biber, D. 2000. Reprezentativnost v projektu korpusu. In: Studie z korpusove lingvistiky, ed. by F. Cermak, J. Klimova, and V. Petkevic, 107-36. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze. [Translation of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
30. Conrad, S., and D. Biber. 2000. Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Evaluation in text, ed. by S. Hunston and G. Thompson, 56-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Biber, D. 2000. Investigating language use through corpus-based analyses of association patterns. In Usage based models of language, ed. by M. Barlow and S. Kemmer, 287-314. Stanford: CSLI Publications. [Reprint of 1996 article in International Journal of Corpus Linguistics]
28. Biber, D., and S. Conrad. 1999. Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, ed. by Hilde Hasselgard and Signe Oksefjell, 181-90. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
27. Biber, D. 1999. Corpus-based analysis of grammar: Variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. In Mireille Bilger (ed.), Questions de methode dans la linguistique sur corpus. Perpignan: Universite de Perpignan.
26. Biber, D., and R. Reppen. 1998. Comparing native and learner perspectives on English grammar: A study of complement clauses. In Learner English on Computer, ed. by Sylviane Granger, 145-158. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
25. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, ed. by T. Nevalainen and L. Kahlas-Tarkka, 253-275. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique. (Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (eds.) (2001), 66-83.)
24. Finegan. E., and D. Biber. 1997. Relative markers in English: Fact and fancy. In From AElfric to the New York Times: Studies in English corpus linguistics, ed. by U. Fries, V. Mller, and P. Schneider, 65-78. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
23. Biber, D. 1997. Lexical bundles in spoken and written discourse: What the grammar books don't tell you. In An update on grammar: How it is learnt - How it is taught (1996 Colloquium Proceedings), ed. by S.B. Gerome, 4-8. Paris: TESOL France.
22. Grabe, W., and D. Biber. 1996. Written language: English. In Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research, ed. by H. Gunther and O. Ludwig, 1495-1499. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
21. Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1995. That and zero complementisers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650-1990. In The verb in contemporary English, ed. by B. Aarts and C. Meyer, 241-257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Biber, D. 1995. Cross-linguistic evidence concerning the linguistic correlates of literacy. In Organization in discourse, ed. by B. Warvik, S. Tanskanen, and R. Hiltunen, 1-14. University of Turku Press.
19. Biber, D. 1994. Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. In: Using Large Corpora, ed. by S. Armstrong, 179-201. Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press. [Reprint of 1993 article in Computational Linguistics]
18. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1994. Multi-dimensional analyses of authors' styles: Some case studies from the eigtheenth century. In Research in Humanities Computing 3, ed. by D. Ross and D. Brink, 3-17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Biber, D., E. Finegan, and D. Atkinson. 1994. ARCHER and its challenges: Compiling and exploring A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. In Creating and using English language corpora, ed. by U. Fries, G. Tottie and P. Schneider, 1-14. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
16. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1994. Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Corpus-based research into language, ed. by N. Oostdijk and P. de Haan, 201-222. Amsterdam: Rodopi. (Reprinted in Conrad and Biber eds. (2001), 108-123.)
15. Biber, D., E. Finegan, D. Atkinson, A. Beck, D. Burges, and J. Burges. 1994. The Design and Analysis of the ARCHER Corpus: A Progress Report. In Corpora across the centuries, ed. by M. Kyto, M. Rissanen, and S. Wright, 3-6. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
(#9 - #14 published In Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, ed. by D. Biber and E. Finegan, OUP)
14. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1994. Introduction: Situating register in sociolinguistics. pp. 3-12.
13. Biber, D. 1994. An analytical framework for register studies. pp. 31-56.
12. Kim, Y-J., and D. Biber. 1994. A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. pp. 157-181.
11. Biber, D., and M. Hared. 1994. Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers. pp. 182-216.
10. Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1994. Register and social dialect variation: An integrated approach. pp. 315-347.
9. Atkinson, D., and D. Biber. 1994. Register: A review of empirical research. pp. 351-385.
8. Biber, D. and E. Finegan. 1992. The linguistic evolution of five written and speech-based English genres from the 17th to the 20th centuries. In History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, ed. by M. Rissanen, et al, 688 704. Berlin: Mouton.
7. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1991. On the exploitation of computerized corpora in variation studies. In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik, 204-220. London: Longman.
6. Biber, D. 1991. Computational applications in applied linguistics. In W. Grabe and R.B. Kaplan (eds.), Introduction to applied linguistics, 257-278. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
5. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1989. Historical drift in three English genres. In Synchronic and diachronic approaches to linguistic variation and change (GURT '88), ed. by Thomas J. Walsh, pp. 22-36. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
4. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1988. Drift in three English genres from the 18th to the 20th centuries: a multidimensional approach. In Corpus linguistics, hard and soft, ed. by Merja Kyto, Ossi Ihalainen, and Matti Rissanen, pp. 83-101. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
3. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1986. An initial typology of English text types. In Jan Aarts and Willem Meijs (eds.), Corpus linguistics II: New studies in the analysis and exploitation of computer corpora, 19‑46. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2. Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1986. Toward a unified model of sociolinguistic prestige. In D. Sankoff (ed.), Diversity and diachrony, 391‑398. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
1, Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1986. Two dimensions of linguistic complexity in English. In Jeff Connor‑Linton, et al. (eds.), Social and cognitive perspectives on language (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11), 1‑24. Department of Linguistics, U.S.C.