CONCLUSION
Doppler methods are essential tools in the cardiovascular examination. As with other medical methodology a systematic approach is required to derive maximum information. Being a dynamic form of examination all the steps in this examination require diagnostic logic. Starting from image acquisition to the choice of Doppler modality and the application of the same and ending with interpretation of results requires the application of a diagnostic algorithm. Knowledge of the limitations of Doppler is a further requirement for proper clinical judgement. By following such an approach, meaningful information can be derived from Doppler, which in turn will result in better patient management.
REFERENCES
GENERAL
Eden A. The Search for Christian Doppler. Springer-Verlag/Wein, New York. 1992.
Evans DH. Doppler Ultrasound: Physics, Instrumentation and Clinical Applications. Wiley, Chichester. 1989. .
Zagzebeski JA. Doppler Instrumentation In Hagen-Ansert SL (Ed).Textbook of Diagnostic Ultrasonography. C.V.Mosby and Company, Missouri. 1994.
Maslak SH, Freund JG. Color Doppler Instrumentation. In: Vascular Imaging by Color Doppler and Magnetic Resonance. Lanzer P (Ed), Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1991
Kisslo J, Adams DB, Belkin RN. Doppler Color Flow Imaging. Churchill Livingstone, New York. 1988.
Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography (5th Ed). Williams and Wilkins, Maryland.1994
Encylopaedia Britannica (2001) Deluxe edition on CD
Wikipedia – The free encylopaedia. www.en-wikipedia.org
SPECIFIC
1.Bollinger A, Partsch H. Christian Doppler is 200 years young. Vasa. 2003;32(4):225-233.
2.Satomura S. Ultrasonic Doppler method for the inspection of cardiac function J ,Acoust Soc Am 1957;29:1181-1185
3.Waggoner AD, Perez JE. Principles and physics of Doppler. Cardiol Clin.1990; 8(2):173-190.
4.Nishimura RA, Miller FA Jr, Callahan MJ, Benassi RC, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Doppler echocardiography: theory, instrumentation, technique, and application. Mayo Clin Proc. 1985 May;60(5):321-343.
5.Wendel CH. Cardiac Doppler echocardiography principles and applications. Del Med J. 1988 May;60(5):285-297.
6.Baker DW. The present role of Doppler techniques in cardiac diagnosis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1978;21(2):79-91.
7.Quiñones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA.Recommendations for Quantification of Doppler Echocardiography: A Report From the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:167-184
8.Sutherland GR, Bijnens B, McDicken WN. Tissue Doppler Echocardiography: Historical Perspective and Technological Considerations. Echocardiography. 1999;16(5):445-453
9.Lambertz H, Schumaker U, Tries HP, Stein T. Improvement of pulmonary venous flow Doppler signal after intravenous injection of Levovist. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 891-898
10.Simpson IA. Colour Doppler flow mapping: providing an insight into cardiac hydrodynamics. J Med Eng Technol. 1990;14(4):133-142.
11.Beomjin Kim, Jeffrey S. Soble, Thomas D. Stamos, Alexander Neumann, James Robergé. Automated Volumetric Flow Quantification Using Angle-Corrected Color Doppler Image. Echocardiography. 2004; 21(5) 399-408
12.Gill RW. Measurement of blood flow by ultrasound: accuracy and sources of error. Ultrasound Med Bio, 1985;7:625–642.
13.Walker A, Olsson E, Wranne B, Ringqvist I, Ask P. Accuracy of spectral Doppler flow and tissue velocity measurements in ultrasound systems. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30(1):127-132
14.Nouri S, Labovitz AJ. Clinical utility of Doppler ultrasound in cardiac diseases. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;15(9):599-634.
15.Bansal RC, Shah PM. Usefulness of echo-Doppler in management of patients with valvular heart disease. Curr Probl Cardiol. 1989;14(6):281-350
16.Lee RT, Bhatia SJ, St John Sutton MG. Assessment of valvular heart disease with Doppler echocardiography. JAMA. 1989;262(15):2131-2135
17.Reisner SA, Meltzer RS. Normal values of prosthetic valve Doppler echocardiographic parameters: a review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1988;1:201-210
18.Lethen H, Tries HP, Brechtken J, Kersting S, Lambertz H. Comparison of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to intracoronary Doppler guidewire measurements for assessment of coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending artery for detection of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(4):412-417.
19.Hatle L, Brubakk A, Tromsdal A, Angelsen B. Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J 1978;40:131-140.
20.Currie PJ, Hagler DJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, Fyfe DA, Bove AA, et al. Instantaneous pressure gradient: a simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correlative study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:800-806.
21.Smith MD, Handshoe R, Handshoe S, Kwan OL, DeMaria AN. Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy. Circulation 1986;73:100-107.
22.Parashar SK. Doppler evaluation of mitral stenosis: Problems and solutions in evaluation. J Indian Academy Echocardiogr. 2001; 6(1): 16-19
23.Enriquez-Sarano M, Seward JB, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Effective regurgitant orifice area: a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:443-451.
24.Teague SM, Heinsimer JA, Anderson JL, Sublett K, Olson EG, Voyles WF, et al. Quantification of aortic regurgitation utilizing continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;8:592-599.
25.Silversides CK, Veldtman GR, Crossin J, Merchant N, Webb GD, McCrindle BW, et al. Pressure half-time predicts hemodynamically significant pulmonary regurgitation in adult patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16(10):1057-1062
26.Mele D, Vandervoort P, Palacios I, Rivera JM, Dinsmore RE, Schwammenthal E, et al. Proximal jet size by Doppler color flow mapping predicts severity of mitral regurgitation: clinical studies. Circulation 1995;91:746-754.
27.Hall SA, Brickner ME, Willett DL, Irani WN, Afridi I, Grayburn PA. Assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by Doppler color flow mapping of the vena contracta.Circulation 1997;95:636-642.
28.Enriquez-Sarano M, Miller FA Jr, Hayes SN, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Effective mitral regurgitant orifice area: clinical use and pitfalls of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:703-709.
Thomas G. Interpretation of Doppler studies of diastolic function. Cardiology Today 2002; 6(5): 236-240
29.Ha JW, Oh JK, Redfield MM, Ujino K, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Triphasic mitral inflow velocity with middiastolic filling: clinical implications and associated echocardiographic findings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 May;17(5):428-431.
30.Brun P, Tribouilloy C, Duval AM, Iserin L, Meguira A, Pelle G, et al. Left ventricular flow propagation during early filling is related to wall relaxation: a color M-mode Doppler analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:420-432.
31.Garcia MJ, Smedira NG, Greenberg NL, Main M, Firstenberg MS, Odabashian J, et al. Color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity is a preload insensitive index of left ventricular relaxation: animal and human validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:201-208.
32.Parthenakis FI, Patrianakos AP, Tzerakis PG, Kambouraki DM, Chrysostomakis SI, Vardas PE. Late left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity determined by color M-mode Doppler in the assessment of diastolic dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004; 17(2): 139-145
33.Tei Chuwa. New non-invasive index for combined systolic and diastolic ventricular function. J Cardiol. 1995;26(2):135-136.
34.Tei C, Nishimura RA, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Noninvasive Doppler-derived myocardial performance index: correlation with simultaneous measurements of cardiac catheterization measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10(2):169-178.
35.Kim W, Otsuji Y, Yuasa T, Minagoe S, Seward JB, Tei C. Evaluation of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with cardiac amyloidosis using Tei index. 2004 ;17(1):45-49
36.Spencer KT, Kirkpatrick JN, Mor-Avi V, Decara JM,Lang RM. Age dependency of the Tei index of myocardial performance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(4):350-352.
(The material in this article may be copied with due acknowledgement. Some special characters may not be correctly represented)