Publications:
European Journal of Operational Research, 2025
The paper studies how common ownership (CO) affects the magnitude and dynamics of investments in a duopoly with exogenous or endogenous roles. In all cases CO is detrimental to consumer surplus and welfare.
Annals of Operations Research, 2023.
The paper shows that operational flexibility guarantees earlier investment in flexible cogeneration systems but has an ambiguous effect in terms of capacity.
European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2022.
The paper shows that decoupled payments (i) induce earlier investment with lower productive capacity; (ii) increase the value of the investment option associated with land and (iii) reduce the volatility of farm income.
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2021.
The paper shows that overlapping ownership arrangements delay follower entry implying longer incumbency which intensifies the race to lead.
Economic Modelling, 2021.
The paper discusses the optimal design of Public Private Partnerships under moral hazard when the private party has bargaining power.
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2021.
The paper shows that reliability options can have adverse effects on investment timing and value.
Review of Industrial Organization, 2021.
The paper shows that the optimal time for exercising a jointly held investment option depends on the bargaining power distribution between the option holders as well as the upstream market power. The latter is always prevailing.
International Game Theory Review, 2021.
The paper discusses the effect of demand and investment cost uncertainty as well as upstream market power on investment timing.
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2020.
The paper discusses the effect of downstream information asymmetries on upstream suppliers.
Working Papers:
R&R (a preliminary version is available here)
The paper discusses how the threat of nationalization affects the timing and scale of foreign investments, and how do these two factors impact the exercise of the nationalization option on the host country side. I show that an increase in the nationalization risk, e.g. due to lower sanctions towards the local government, will result in underinvestment, both in terms of timing and in terms of scale, as well as hastened nationalization. Hence the threat of nationalization leads to premature and undersized investments, rather than deterring them entirely.
Under review (a preliminary version is available here)
We introduce overlapping ownership into a sequential-move duopoly and draw welfare implications contrasting with those of other standard oligopoly models. Internalization of rival profits softens follower output and entry decisions, prompting more aggressive leader behavior. Overlapping ownership thereby exerts a procompetitive effect on market outcomes via two mechanisms. First, in a Stackelberg equilibrium higher follower internalization increases leader output enough to raise welfare under general conditions. Second, in an entry deterrence framework, higher follower internalization shifts the leader's strategy from accommodation to deterrence which raises welfare, particularly relative to the benchmark scenario where firms maximize profits independently.
Under review (a preliminary version is available here)
We study an irreversible investment problem with endogenous scale under uncertainty, characterized by a concave subsidy schedule featuring a policy-induced kink. Using a real options framework, we analyze how the structure of policy support, in particular, the presence of threshold-induced kinks, reshapes optimal investment timing and scale. Motivated by the recent reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, which introduced redistributive payments linked to "first hectares", we show that nonsmooth support schemes fundamentally alter investment incentives. Smaller projects respond to higher subsidies by expanding investment scale without affecting timing, while larger projects exhibit non-monotonic responses: higher basic payments encourage expansion but delay investment, whereas stronger redistributive components induce earlier investment in smaller projects. These asymmetric responses generate a pooling effect around the policy threshold, whereby heterogeneous investors optimally converge to similar project sizes. By introducing policy-induced kinks into a real options model with endogenous scale, the analysis shows that redistributive subsidies can generate pooling and non-monotonic timing-scale responses that cannot arise under smooth or linear payoff structures. More generally, the results highlight how non-linear subsidies affect irreversible investment decisions, with implications for subsidy capitalization and the dynamic allocation of land.