The answer is yes or no also. its is depends on learners how they learn. In digital world technology take place but its not work itself so there is also one person who operate all the things. In traditional classroom there is no space of machine but in 21st century there is necessary that students are aware about technology and use it
By google you can do anything there is no need of teacher its also gave a better knowledge then teacher. Earlier all class depends on only one teacher and materials but time is change now all thin becomes digital so in education system teacher is there but ideal form of education is one teacher gave knowledge with technology. Now students can learn anything at any place and anytime. self learning is a best way to gain something and technology gave to you, it's become your teacher.
But in sometimes technology can not replace the great teachers, who helped you in any situation.
Google give you all the information and knowledge but how its connect for that you want a great teacher.
Respected sir,
here i am sharing my view about this topic
Peruvian-born writer Mario Vargas Llosa published a book titled Notes on the Death of Culture: Essays on Spectacle and Society, in which he traces the development and what he sees as the decline of culture in modern society. Because it is incompatible with freedom. You just need to scratch the surface to see that nationalism involves a kind of racism. If you believe that belonging to a certain country or nation or race or religion is a privilege, a value in itself, you believe you are superior to others. And racism inevitably leads to violence and the suppression of freedom. That is why liberalism from the times of Adam Smith has perceived this kind of collectivism in nationalism – the rejection of reason for an act of faith. Marxism is already on the fringes of political life but that’s not the case with populism, which shatters democracies from within.
It is thanks to Sharmeen’s effort that the law on honor killings is being reviewed in Pakistan. It is thanks to Malala’s struggle that girls’ education is in the spotlight, not just in Pakistan but the world over. Far from humiliating their country, they have done it a valuable service. Had their efforts not been recognized and rewarded in the West, I honestly don’t know if our government would have taken serious cognizance of the issues they’ve flagged.
It is no secret that hundreds of women are murdered every year for honour, yet it’s taken the buzz that Sharmeen’s single film has generated abroad to prompt Nawaz Sharif’s avowal to put an end to honour killings at home and embolden Imran Khan to publicly decry the practice.
Nobody quite knows how this will pan out. Not even Nigel Farage who has already began pedalling back on the promises he made to redirect all the funds sent over to Brussels into the NHS. Whether Britain will emerge stronger from exiting depends on who you ask. But one thing is certain: there will be huge changes. I for one think that even if Britain comes out richer economically, it will be poorer in both spirit and standing.
Pehredar piya ki
In just six episodes Pehredaar Piya Ki has been called everything from a regressive. To begin with, Tejaswi Prakash as Diya, an 18-year-old princess, is given the sole responsibility of Afaan Khan as Ratan Banna , the 9-year-old heir to a supposedly enviable Rajput empire, one that he stands the risk of losing his life over. Of course the only way for her to be able to protect him is to be his wife.I am not be the target audience that Pehredaar Piya Ki is even trying to impress, and frankly, neither are the rest of its critics. But as a viewer I have every right to be offended. Pehredaar Piya Ki not only sells stupidity in the name of content, but also sets itself as proof that we’ve come to terms with bad acting and horrible storytelling into the most meaningless situations.Earlier, shows such as Balika Vadhu have addressed the issue of child marriage in India. However, with her new show, Tejaswi assures that they are not promoting the social evil in any way.
“Over here we are not promoting child marriage at all or how beautifully our love story is going to evolve,” she says.
Fiction and lies
Is fiction good for us? We spend huge chunks of our lives immersed in novels, films, TV shows, and other forms of fiction. Some see this as a positive thing, arguing that made-up stories cultivate our mental and moral development. But others have argued that fiction is mentally and ethically corrosive. Fiction build the morality of individuals and societies, or does it break it down. Until recently, we’ve only been able to guess about the actual psychological effects of fiction on individuals and society. But new research in psychology and broad-based literary analysis is finally taking questions about morality out of the realm of speculation.
Atheism and Morality
Is fiction good for us? We spend huge chunks of our lives immersed in novels, films, TV shows, and other forms of fiction. Some see this as a positive thing, arguing that made-up stories cultivate our mental and moral development. But others have argued that fiction is mentally and ethically corrosive. Fiction build the morality of individuals and societies, or does it break it down. Until recently, we’ve only been able to guess about the actual psychological effects of fiction on individuals and society. But new research in psychology and broad-based literary analysis is finally taking questions about morality out of the realm of speculation.
Oneness of literature
In the Northrop Frye archetypal criticism he talked about seasons. He says that our emotions and feelings are related with season. He also talk about oneness of all world literature that the skeleton of the literature. T. S. Eliot talked about tradition and individual talent. In this essay he says that history is the great heritage we learn many thing from history. With the help of historical sense writers write many thing. The poem Waste land by t. s. eliot and chekov's joke there are many similarities both are related with love. Mountain is symbol of both of the story. Marie reminds her days with her childhood days when she with her cousin Archduke. It suggests the lust. This poem is also about the sex but chekov's story is not it,s about attraction. Speaker may love Nadia he again and again said that i love you nadia but not seriously we confuse that he seriously love or not but nadia really loves him when she married with someone perhaps she never forget that words. Kabhi kabhi is the movie is related. T. S. Eliot says that in modern times sexuality take place and spirituality is dead.