The role the government and its policies played in shaping the living patterns in Detroit and its surrounding suburbs.
Home ownership has been the main tool of wealth creation in the United States since our country's founding, but in particular since the 1920s. It is the way that generational wealth is constructed. Having a highly stratified, highly segregated market in which people of color and minorities were excluded from buying into it, created today's reality. [2]
Established in 1933, Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) was created to stabilize the mortgage market and end the foreclosure crisis of the Great Depression by providing low-cost loans to owners facing evictions. Approximately 40 percent of the country's homeowners got help from this agency. African Americans and certain groups of minorities had a hard time utilizing such help.
By enlisting local realtors and lenders to devise maps that would guide banks in their lending. Using a color code to label neighborhoods based on their level of investment "risk," the color red designated neighborhoods where the property values were already dropping, yellow designated areas that were likely to decline, blue designated the second-best investment, and green represented neighborhoods with the greatest likelihood of appreciation. The undesirable locations marked in red often correlated with areas in which people of color or ethnic minorities lived. "Their rules specifically stated that neighborhoods with a Jewish population could not be placed in the green category, regardless of property values. Black neighborhoods, and neighborhoods seen as a risk of having black residents, were marked in red, since there was a concensus that property values would fall if African Americans lived there or might live there. This redlining would continue for three decades. Every neighborhood in Detroit with residents was colored red n the HOLC maps, thereby denying blacks access to federally backed housing loans." [3] With such redlining came disinvestment and deterioration in a highly segregated society.
Without the ability to take advantage of the government subsidized FHA loans, due to redlining, many African Americans looked to land contracts as a means of homeownership. Paying in installment plans, it often took 15-20 years for homeownership to be transferred. With inflated sales prices, more often than not eviction took place when one month's payment was late. Thus, no equity was accumulated. This was cyclical. Once an eviction took place, the speculator could start the process over again, taking advantage of another desperate want-to-be-homeowner from the black community.
Coupled with land contracts, came blockbusting. Scheming in the buffer areas between black and white communities, speculators would buy property with the intention of renting or selling to African Americans for well above market price. In addition, such speculators would try to scare whites into believing that their neighborhoods were turning into slums, and that values would soon plumet. In a panic, white homeowners would sell their homes for less than its value. Blockbusters got creative in their tactics and would often employ African Americans themselves to do the scaring. For example, they would hire African American women to push babies in strollers through white neighborhoods, or have African American men blast their radios as they drove through white neighborhoods. [4] Such tactics continued to further white flight out of the city, thus shrinking Detroit's tax base, putting a strain on public services.
Built in 1941, Detroit’s “Segregation Wall” was built to separate a proposed all-white neighborhood from an already existing African American neighborhood. Due to redlining, the FHA would not give out loans for an all-white community due to its close proximity to African American neighborhoods. According to the FHA, artificial barriers could be considered protection from “inharmonious racial groups,” thus in order to secure an FHA loan, the construction of six feet high and a half a mile long wall was built to divide the African American community from that of the all-white Blackstone Park community. [5] The Detroit Eight Mile Wall still remains intact today but has undergone some mural beautification.
As depicted in Map 2.1 [6], large swaths of land were annexed by the city of Detroit between 1905 and 1926. Tireman Road, which originally served as a dividing line between the city and the surrounding townships, eventually became the de facto line keeping African Americans from moving north. Closer to the more "black friendly" automotive manufacturing plants, this old west side neighborhood began to swell and expand as Detroit's black middle-upper class moved in. [7]
Restrictive Covenants first appeared in Detroit in 1910, but it wasn't until after World War I that developers began using restrictive covenants in deeds. With contesting from the African American community across the nation, in 1926 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of restrictive covenants in Corrigan v. Buckley. This had profound impacts on cities across the country. In Detroit, approximately 80 percent of the residential properties located beyond Grand Boulevard were shielded by restrictive covenants. In fact, in the five years succeeding World War II, the vacant outlying parts of central Detroit were filled with the creation of 43,000 homes and apartments, with almost every single one of them restricted to white occupants only. [8] This posed a problem for the many African Americans who moved to the city for work during the Great Migration.
In 1944, the McGhees, an African American family knowingly moved into the "wrong" neighborhood with a restrictive covenant in place. Evicted by the neighborhood association when a local judge ruled in favor of the restrictive covenant, the McGhees were ordered out. Two years later the Michigan Supreme Court upheld the decision when the NAACP appealed their earlier ruling. The NAACP ended up taking this case all the way to the Supreme Court, in which they ruled unanimously that restrictive covenants violated the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Fourteenth Amendment. Thus, the McGhees could secure their home. Unfortunately, the ruling did not prohibit restrictive covenants being placed in deeds. [9] All in all, the decision really just prohibited the courts from enforcing restrictive covenants, not their use. Consequently, restrictive covenants continued to be used privately to enforce the segregation of American cities and their suburbs. It wasn't until the Fair Housing Act of 1968, that writing racial covenants into deeds became illegal. [10]
Incorporation of cities and towns was essential to keeping undesirables out. In fact, the 1950s saw the largest wave of incorporation, with 1,074 new governments created nationwide. In Metro Detroit, 31 new home-rule cities were established between 1940 and 1965. Suburbs in Oakland and Wayne counties annexed approximately 4,000 acres combined through incorporation. [11] Once an area was officially incorporated, those in power (whites) had zoning power; the ability to restrictively zone land.
Zoning ordinances were often used by those in power to protect the racial homogeneity of their neighborhoods. More specifically, they would do so by limiting or excluding apartments and public housing entirely using zoning laws and would often times limit or exclude moderately priced homes. By setting minimum sizes for residential plots, many suburban communities were able to keep their population density low. For example, in 1960 there were only 2,674,000 apartment units in U.S. suburbs, in comparison to 15,180,000 single-family units. And while there were more apartments built in the late 1960s, the existing zoning ordinances bottlenecked the areas in which apartments could be built, which tended to be in the poorer areas. In fact, while there was a large housing shortage in the city of Detroit, suburbs like Troy and Southfield, kept large tracts of land undeveloped, so that way they could control what developers could build, and which developers could build it. In fact, while there was a large housing shortage in the city of Detroit, suburbs like Troy and Southfield, kept large tracts of land undeveloped, so that way they could control what developers could build, and which developers could build it. [12] Zoning was a tool that was used by those in power (whites) to exclude people based on their incomes, which was more often than not also based along racial lines.
Zoning science created exclusionary language that tiptoed around loaded racism. [13] Zoning ordinances adopted in Metro Detroit borrowed from the language of Michigan's original planning and zoning acts of 1921. "Thus local suburban statutes required that regulation be part of a plan designed to 'promote public health, safety, and general welfare,' and they stipulated that all land-use decisions be made 'with reasonable consideration' of a district's 'peculiar suitability for particular uses, the conservation of property values and the general trend and character of building and population development.'" [14] While there is no direct use of racist or exclusionary language, the implication is that certain groups of people weren't suited for particular areas of the Metro Detroit area. Thus, zoning power allowed whites to keep the suburbs homogenous.
In an attempt to stop African Americans from moving into the Sojourner Truth homes, white residents posted signs opposite the new U.S. federal government housing project. [15]
Contributing to the race riots of 1943 was the creation of the Sojourner Truth Homes, which was to house African American defense workers on the edge of an all-white neighborhood. The Federal Works Agency teamed up with the Detroit Housing Commission, creating the housing units near the Seven Mile-Fenelon Improvement Association, whose tenants used violence to keep the new African American families out. With tensions running high over housing and jobs, in the end twenty-five African Americans were killed due to the racial violence, along with nine white individuals. Unfortunately, the Detroit Housing Commission caved to white violence and ended up pledging to keep future housing projects segregated. [16]
During the immediate postwar years, Detroit saw more than 200 acts of violence and intimidation directed at African Americans attempting to move into majority white neighborhoods. Police didn't do much to deter such violent behavior against minorities. In fact, the Michigan Civil Rights Commission reported that in 1968 nearly all attempts that were made by African American families to integrate into the suburbs was met with hostility and harassment. [17] When restrictive covenants and zoning ordinances didn't work, suburban whites used hatred and intimidation to keep their lives as sheltered and homogenous as possible.
Like many cities at the dawn on the Twentieth Century, Detroit's borders were expanding. With the auto industry growing, and laborers flocking to the city, Detroit annexed land to accommodate. In 1926, the state of Michigan adopted restrictive annexation laws to limit the physical expansion of the city and its limits, which helped ensure that post-WWII growth would be limited to the suburbs. [18]
The Public Works Administration (PWA) was established in 1933 with the purpose of reducing unemployment and creating public infrastructure. Creating twenty-six housing projects in the Northeast and Midwest, sixteen of the housing projects were reserved for whites, while only eight were reserved for African Americans, with two projects being integrated. Projects for African American residents were located in low-income neighborhoods, further segregating neighborhoods not only by race, but economically as well.
The federal government ended the practice of directly funding the construction of public housing in 1937, but quickly replaced this centralized system with a more decentralized system in which localities wanting such projects could build their own with use of federal government subsidies funded by the U.S. Housing Authority (USHA). The USHA continued to maintain policies of segregation, claiming to respect existing neighborhood racial characteristics. [19]
In 1941, the federal government commissioned a bomber plant to be built in Willow Run, which was an undeveloped suburb of Detroit that had no preexisting racial housing arrangements. When the government built housing for workers, they instituted a policy that only whites could live there. [20] Thirty plus miles from the city of Detroit, which is where the majority of the African American community resided, the opportunity to work at Willow Run did not flow to all Metro Detroiters.
How the government's urban renewal program destroyed Detroit's black community.
Deindustrialization hurt Detroit tremendously; the Motor City was fueled by car manufacturing. First came the loss of jobs to the suburbs in the 50s and 60s, then the outsourcing of jobs to cheaper labor markets overseas was the final blow. The population of Detroit has continued to decline since the 1950s. In fact, Detroit has lost 62 percent of its population since then. With a shrunken population comes less of a tax base. A more recent flight of middle-class African Americans out of Detroit has taken place since 2000, with the city having lost 26 percent of its population since then. [21] The continued loss of middle-class taxpayers, coupled with rampant corruption among many other things, led Detroit to file the largest Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy ever in 2013. And while the city has begun to bounce back, it is in gentrified pockets. As of the 2019 Census, 33.2 percent of Detroit residents were living below the poverty line, with a mean income deficit of $7,220 for a family of four. [22] Meaning many families are living well below the poverty line, not making enough to make ends meet.
Footnotes
[1] Division of Research and Statistics: Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Hearne Brothers Present Polyconic Projection Map of Greater Detroit. Scale unknown. In: Mapping Inequity: Redlining in the New Deal. <https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining/#loc=13/42.335/-82.958&city=detroit-mi> (accessed on March 2, 2023)
[2] O’Mara, Margaret, “Lecture Two: The Crisis of Capitalism and What the New Deal Did.” Lecture, Gettysburg-GLI MA in American History, 2022.
[3] Danziger, Sheldon, Reynolds Farley, and Harry J. Holzer, Detroit Divided (Russell Sage Foundation, 2000), 23.
[4] Rothstein, Richard, The Color of Law (Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2017), 95-96.
[5] Einhorn, Erin, and Olivia Lewis, “Built to Keep Black from White: The Story Behind Detroit’s ‘Wailing Wall.’” Bridge Detroit (July 19, 2021). <https://www.bridgedetroit.com/built-to-keep-black-from-white-the-story-behind-detroits-wailing-wall/> (accessed on March 2, 2023)
[6] Danziger, Farley, and Holzer, Detroit Divided, 27.
[7] The Early Years of the Tireman Bus Line (2012). <www.detroittransithistory.info/Routes/Tireman-JoyHistory.html> (accessed on April 16, 2023)
[8] Danziger, Farley, and Holzer, Detroit Divided, 148.
[9] Rothstein, The Color of Law, 152.
[10] Welsh, Nancy H., "Racially restrictive Covenants in the United States: A Call to Action." University of Michigan (2018), 137. <deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/143831/A_12%20Racially%20Restrictive%20Covenants%20in%20the%20US.pdf#:~:text=Racially%20restrictive%20covenants%20were%20widespread%20tools%20of%20discrimination,practice%20of%20writing%20racial%20covenants%20into%20deeds%20illegal.> (accessed April 30, 2023)
[11] Freund, David M.P., Colored Property: State Policy and White Racial Politics in Suburban America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 218.
[12] Freund, Colored Property: State Policy and White Racial Politics in Suburban America, 230-231.
[13] Freund, Colored Property: State Policy and White Racial Politics in Suburban America, 214.
[14] Freund, Colored Property: State Policy and White Racial Politics in Suburban America, 236.
[15] Siegel, Arthur S., Sign Posted in Response to Proposed Sojourner Truth Housing Project (February 1942), fsa 8d13572, Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, Washington D.C. <www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/fsa.8d13572/ > (accessed on April 30, 2023)
[16] Lassiter, Matthew, and Susan C. Salvatore, “Civil Rights in America: Racial Discrimination in Housing.” The National Historic Landmarks Program (March 2021): 56-57. <https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalhistoriclandmarks/upload/Civil_Rights_Housing_NHL_Theme_Study_revisedfinal.pdf> (accessed on March 14, 2023)
[17] Rothstein, The Color of Law, 146.
[18] Danziger, Farley, and Holzer, Detroit Divided, 23.
[19] Danziger, Farley, and Holzer, Detroit Divided, 23.
[20] Rothstein, The Color of Law, 26.
[21] Fox, Justin, "There's No Formula for Fixing Detroit, and That's a Good Thing." Harvard Business Review, July 24, 2013. <hbr.org/2013/07/theres-no-formula-for-fixing-detroit.html> (accessed on May 1, 2023)
[22] Whitaker, David, "Poverty Statistics for Detroit and the State of Michigan" (City of Detroit City Council Legislative Policy Division, 2022), 1-2. <detroitmi.gov/sites/detroitmi.localhost/files/2022-09/Detroit%20Poverty%20Stats.CAY2%20Revised.pdf#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20U.S.%20Census%20Bureau,%20currently%20the,or%2013.7%20percent%20of%20the%20state%E2%80%99s%20total%20population.1> (accessed on May 1, 2023)