09.30
11.00
11.30
13.00
14.00
15.30
16.00
17.30
Session 1:
Introductions and short position paper talks from participants to share experiences.
________
Break
________
Session 2:
Opportunities and Problematisation at the HCI and Technology Regulation Interface
________
Lunch
________
Session 3:
Hands on Exploration of Toolkits and Creative/Speculative Approaches followed by group discussion.
________
Break
________
Session 4:
Collective Workshop Mapping of Priorities and Research Agenda Setting.
What is the role of design as a form of regulation and how can design practitioners work with EU regulation in design?
How do we design for legal change, given the ever growing, complex, and changing nature of EU technology regulations?
How do we address complexity of engaging with law and helping find common understanding of legalese and what it means for design?
________
________
What role can Nordic HCI and participatory design play in creating more contestation and rights led approaches to regulation of technology design?
How can design be understood beyond instrumental framings, that often dominate in formal EU regulation and laws? How can we go beyond seeing law as just compliance to be implemented in design?
What are the tensions between ethics and law, how do these play out and - what can CSCW/HCI offer in navigating these tensions?
________
________
What role is there for creative and speculative ways of reframing the relationship between regulation and design?
What is the role of practical toolkits in bringing regulation into technology design and doing bridging work such as card decks and toolkits?
How are toolkits being used, by whom and what knowledge do they create for whom? (epistemologically speaking)
________
________
What different forms of knowledge production does HCI bring to regulation?
How can HCI/CSCW influence policy beyond legal compliance, to identify gaps not currently being regulated?
How can we bring a values led, social justice, ‘more-than-human’ and democratic lens to critique ‘regulation by design’, to foster more ambitious social change?