Boaventura de Sousa Santos is Professor of Sociology, University of Coimbra (Portugal), and Distinguished Legal Scholar at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He earned an LL.M and J.S.D. from Yale University and holds the Degree of Doctor of Laws, Honoris Causa, by McGill University. He is Director Emeritus of the Center for Social Studies at the University of Coimbra and has written and published widely on the issues of globalization, sociology of law and the state, epistemology, social movements and the World Social Forum. more
Postpandemic scenarios from the perspective of the epistemologies of the south.
Raul Trejo Villalobos. Professor and researcher at the Autonomous University of Chiapas (Unach). Phd. in Philosophy by the University of Salamanca, Spain. Founder and first coordinator of the degree in Philosophy, in Unach. Member of the National System of Researchers of Mexico since 2015. Member of the Philosophic Association of Mexico. He has collaborated on academic projects with Ibero-American research groups. His academic production, in the areas of Philosophy, History of Philosophy, Latin American and Mexican Philosophy and of the native peoples, integrates various participations in Congresses, articles in prestigious international magazines and books of his authorship and collective books published by recognized publishing groups. Some of his recent publications are: “What is philosophy? An introduction to the Mexican philosophy of the 20th century”, Inter-American Journal of Philosophy, Volume 9, 2018; Philosophy and life: The philosophical itinerary of José Vasconcelos (Mexico, Editorial Jitanjafora, 2017); José Vasconcelos: South American Conferences and Other Writings (Mexico, Editorial Silla Vacia, 2019) and Philosophy of Indigenous Peoples (Mexico, UNACH, 2019).
There are currently 12 indigenous peoples in the state of Chiapas, most of them direct descendants of Maya civilization. Since 500 years ago, the features of their history are colonization, resistance and marginalization. Higher and university education, on the other side, are recent in the history of the state. The Autonomous University of Chiapas (UNACH), for example, was founded in 1974, and the Intercultural University of Chiapas (UNICH) in 2004. During these years, the number of members from original peoples that have entered higher education has increased. The main problem in this situation remains in the fact that the institutions of higher education have a number of Western criteria as their characterizing features. Thus, the members of original peoples are forced into learning another language and, most of the time, into abandoning their cultures. It is in this sense that the purpose of my presentation is to make some initial reflections on interculturality, taking Raul Fornet Betancout and Luis Villoro into account, in one hand; and, on the other, sharing some experiences of intercultural dialogue. My work’s central idea lies in considering the main problems of interculturality so as to elaborate a more accurate proposal in the immediate and medium-term future.
Preciosa de Joya studied philosophy in the Ateneo de Manila University, where she wrote an M.A. thesis on Walter Benjamin’s idea of history, developing an interest in historiography, religion, and aesthetics. In an attempt to reflect critically on and move beyond the limits of the discipline of philosophy, she took her Ph.D. in Southeast Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore, under the supervision of Filipino historian, Reynaldo Ileto. She is currently Assistant Professor at the Philosophy department in Ateneo de Manila University and a teaching associate at the Singapore University of Social Sciences. more
JEEPNEYS TO THE FUTURE: TRANSMISSIONS FROM THE PAST
While recognizing itself as the heir to Third World liberation struggles, the term “global South” aspires to surpass the legacy of its predecessor. Regarded as profoundly entrenched in eurocentric notions and representations, the “Third World” has been deemed untenable as a geopolitical concept and emancipatory project. As a response, the global South represents the collective struggle to overcome this epistemic violence/dependence and reclaim the dignity and self-determination of marginalized social groups by ensuring a pluriverse of alternative knowledge and forms of being.
However, in examining Filipino narratives of the future, I am seeing not new forms but past projects that have been rendered obsolete or contentious due to elements that might have been all too quickly dismissed as reactionary by a careless glance of the “global South” eye. In re-evaluating these narratives in their own terms, I hope to recover traces of futures that might have been marginalized unwittingly by the very discourses that seek to uphold liberal and progressive thought.
In my presentation, I return to the work of the Filipino filmmaker Kidlat Tahimik (Quiet Lightning), who is associated with the Third Cinema movement and known as the founder of the Philippine New Wave. Despite his ubiquitous reference to underdevelopment in the shadow of Western economic and technological progress, Kidlat has helped formulate the Third World not merely as a condition but a way of life that envisions an alternative modernity. Juxtaposed to this is a similar yet different vision found in the work of University of the Philippines professor Zeus Salazar, who pioneered the “indigenization” movement in Philippine social sciences that began in the 1970s and have gained prominence in academic circles today. Endearingly known to his students as Bathala (God), Salazar has been condemned by critics as nativist and ethnonationalist, not only in his uncompromising use of the Filipino language in intellectual discourse but also in his complicity in the historical project, Tadhana of former president-dictator Ferdinand Marcos. Seen in its own terms however, Salazar’s vision of “Bagong Kasaysayan” (New History) seems to offer not only an alternative historiography and historical narrative but a path towards establishing autonomy in discourse and knowledge production in the age of Neo-liberalism.
Dominic Lopes is Distinguished University Scholar and Professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of British Columbia. A member of the UBC aesthetic group, has worked on pictorial representation; the aesthetic and epistemic value of pictures, including scientific images; theories of art and its value; the ontology of art; computer art and new art forms; and aesthetic value, wherever it may be found. more
Aesthetic Justice: A Framework
People with different cultures come into contact with each other, and the contacts can go well or they can go badly. Indeed, if justice is goodness in the arrangement of social life, then arrangements of social life that shape cultural contact can be just or unjust. This lecture introduces a framework for thinking about what is special in contact between aesthetic cultures, in particular, and proposes two interests that should be built into a theory of aesthetic justice.
Max Ryynänen is senior lecturer (tenured) in theory of visual culture at Aalto University (Finland). He is the editor-in-chief of Popular Inquiry: The Journal of the Aesthetics of Kitsch, Camp and Mass Culture (with Jozef Kovalcik) and The Journal of Somaesthetics (with Richard Shusterman and Falk Heinrich). His late works include e.g. On the Philosophy of Central European Art: The History of an Institution and its Global Competitors (Lexington Books) and Aesthetics in Dialogue: Applying Philosophy of Art in a Global World (ed. with Zoltan Somhegyi, Peter Lang). Fall 2021 Appearances of the Political (ed. with Elisabetta Di Stefano and Carsten Friberg) will be published by Springer. Ryynänen’s current interests range from the history of the institutional structures supporting artistic activities to aesthetics and politics. In Finnish Ryynänen is also a writer (essay books, novel coming out 2021) and. He has also worked as a gallerist. More: http://maxryynanen.net
THE WORLD IS A STAGE
Back to Rasa Theory: Can the oldest atmosphere theory in the world help us to understand today’s (and our future) aesthetic manipulation?
Bharata’s (300BC-300AD), later most famously Abhinavagupta’s (11thC), idea of emotive atmospheres in theater – sometimes also used to discuss painting and music – have during the centuries been fermented into all forms of Indian cultural production, including late arts like film, where it has been used and discussed widely.
The original idea is that theater, at its best, has always only one dominant emotive atmosphere (erotic, comic, etc), and that this “rasa”, as it is called, appropriates and elevates everyday emotions to a reflective plane, where a heightened consciousness is reached. This ancient work of theory is an impressive attempt to understand aesthetic experience.
It is not just in art where we are surrounded by atmospheres created by others, though. Today we are face atmospheric manipulation nearly everywhere we go. We are stimulated by physical and digital visual design and soundscapes – from the opening sounds of our computers to the beeps our cell phones make (when we press the buttons), without forgetting the background music that we hear in elevators and malls. They build an aesthetic everyday texture for us.
We have of course gained atmospheric support and stimulation from buildings, bridges and decorations throughout human history, but the amount we today receive stimulation from professional designers (who design our lifeworld), has reached a totally new stage, of which we probably do not yet really understand/know much.
How can we cope with this development?
We do not often know who builds our digital environments nor the soundscapes of our shops – nor do we know who are the atmosphere masters that create our aesthetics of airports or malls. One thing is clear, though. All of this is less produced in the US and the West than most of us believe. India, the home of the oldest theory of atmospheres – where rasa theory is taught in the design school – is actually the birthplace of a major amount of aesthetic everyday stimulation.
Atmospheres invite us, through visuals and sound, to consume, relax and feel at home on pages, with software and in social media – as much as they do that in malls, shops and in offices.
Today we have a broad array of theories of atmosphere in use, but is there any reason why we would not take a look at the most classical one, the rasa theory of Bharata and Abhinavagupta, as one contender for helping us to make sense of our everyday life?
The ancient theater theorists talked about a bliss taking over during a performance, pulling us up to a reflective plane. Today’s everyday atmospheres are of course of a much lighter, more shallow nature, and they are not about simple classifications like “the comic” nor “the erotic”. Both the creators of atmospheric stimulation and the users of it (we, us), live in much less defined atmospheres, that often, actually, just give the sense of being in the right place (for consumption), a feeling of safety, an experience of being “cool” – and getting in the mood for leisure.
Nobody knows how much more intense the future will be in this sense, but we have at least no reason to think, that this development would stop to accelerate. In my talk I will think of rasa theory as one possible mirror that we can use to shed light on our experience of today’s world of work and consumerism – with deep roots to the cultural background that so many of the designers of our aesthetic everyday share. I will also propose new rasa for future students of the art of atmosphere and atmospheric manipulation.
Brian Goeltzenleuchter is a hybrid media artist working at the intersection of printmaking, olfactory art, and social engagement. Through an artistic practice that uses digital technologies to mediate the senses of sight, sound, touch, and smell, Goeltzenleuchter designs situations which explore the dynamics between individuals and the cities and institutions which shape those relationships. His current artwork considers the way in which personal and cultural narratives can be expressed through the sense of smell. He creates maps—not for way-finding, but for place-making—as a means of locating the “self” and the “other” in the city. Goeltzenleuchter’s participatory art has been critically celebrated for expanding the olfactory potential for transmedia storytelling. He earned his MFA in 2001 at UC San Diego. From 2002 - 2008 he was Associate Professor and Director of MFA Studies in Art at Central Washington University. He has held residencies at the Institute for Art and Olfaction, Los Angeles, Banff Centre, Canada, and Centrum Beeldende Kunst, The Netherlands. He is Research Fellow at the Institute for Public and Urban Affairs, San Diego State University. He also serves on the faculty of Eureka Institute for Translational Medicine, a non-profit foundation with educational and research objectives in the field of International Translational Medicine. more
"The Olfactory Present and the Future Museum"
How would your understanding of your city differ if you let your nose, rather than your eyes, lead the way? So begins Sillage, an olfactory artwork that activates the museum’s site as a platform for participation in public life by using neighborhood smells to initiate informal conversations with visitors around the politics of urbanism. My lecture frames Sillage as a ‘counter-monument.’ Drawing on the writing of James E. Young, I will define the olfactory counter-monument as that which is ephemeral, physically unimposing, and capable of generating discourse chiefly because it hastens public memory. I introduce the ‘dialogical paradox’ of olfactory art; whereas smells are resistant to linguistic sense-making, they also stimulate a type of collective wonder that leads to active dialog. Inspired by Hannah Arendt’s concept of the vita activa, this sort of dialog challenges Immanuel Kant’s aesthetics by proposing a relational aesthetics based on active smelling that leads to engagement with the city and its constituencies. I conclude by speculating on ways in which the future museum might reassess the physical, organizational, and curatorial paradigms that support neo-Kantian ideals by employing currently marginalized practices of decolonizing its collection and collaborating with its diverse constituency.