Making Modern Forgeries
Making Modern Forgeries
Art forgery grew exponentially in the 19th century, due to the ever-growing art market and interest in historical artworks. With expanding collections around the world, forgers thrived finding gaps in authentication methods, forcing the art market to be more cautious. As technology evolved, forgers had more technologies like photography and printing to create fake artworks, which facilitated the copying of emerging art styles like realism and impressionism. In contemporary times, digital tools like editing software and Artificial Intelligence help create images simulating the original style of the artists. Hence, forgers continue to reproduce historical artworks and introduce them as genuine.
When producing modern fakes, skilled forgers pay attention to the pigments and supports, also attempting to recreate fractures, discoloration, and other indicators of wear. However, false aging can appear overly purposeful, even manufactured, while minor errors in perspective, composition, or signature placement can indicate that a painting is not what it appears to be. When examining the Vincenzo Canino forgeries, it is important to discern whether they accurately portray his characteristic style and identify any inaccuracies. Canino's original plein air paintings —which is a style of painting that captures the light and atmosphere of an outdoor scene— include loose and expressive brushstrokes, while the imitations appear more controlled, implying that the artist had more time to perfect them. Similarly, the forgeries of Leon Giuseppe Buono and Gaetano Bocchetti are excellent examples of the difficulty in realizing forgeries. These 20th-century Neapolitan painters followed the masters of the 19th-century School of Posillipo, depicting oil plein air paintings as nomads that traveled along the countryside or coast to portray local natural elements and picturesque landscapes. Painted using tempera instead of oil paint, the works in this exhibition demonstrate that the forgers were not adequately informed. A meticulous analysis illustrates the challenges of making modern forgery, as well as the need for more verification procedures to preserve artistic authenticity.
- V. Canino, Rural Landscape
Date: 21st century; Forgery of Vincenzo Canino (Italian, Naples 1892–1978 Naples)
Medium: Tempera on panel
Dimensions: 34.6 x 44.90 cm (13.6 x 17.6 in.)
Credit Line: Comando Carabinieri Tutela Patrimonio Culturale (TPC)
This forgery, like most of Canino’s works, depicts a farmhouse in a village near Naples, the painter’s original hometown. It can be compared to one of Canino’s oil painting, Viale di Campagna, which also portrays the daily life of the Neapolitan countryside. This is a distinctive feature in Canino’s works, as he also focused on portraying the lives of the farmers and peasants of the Italian rural landscape. This forgery was effective at including many details and treating the medium similarly to the style of Canino, but it seems not have been produced in plein air —a technique, where artists paint outdoors to capture the atmosphere in natural light. The brushstrokes might be more controlled and probably took longer to make than the original plein air paintings by Canino, who worked with faster strokes to capture a fleeting moment in the day.
- V. Canino, Summer Landscape
Date: 21st century; Forgery of Vincenzo Canino (Italian, Naples 1892–1978 Naples)
Medium: Tempera on panel
Dimensions: 31.7 x 40.9 cm (12.4 x 16.1 in.)
Credit Line: Comando Carabinieri Tutela Patrimonio Culturale (TPC)
This painting imitates Canino’s style, a painter who is known for his atmospheric and suburban street settings. Most likely, it captures a summer rocky coastline near the Gulf of Naples featuring small tucked away coves enclosed by steep cliffs. The forger tries to render Canino’s picturesque style, with detail in the architectural elements and small figures seating under sun umbrellas. Canino mostly painted in plein air, warranting larger brushstrokes to capture life in motion. This piece fails in this regard, capturing a more rigid composition compared to Canino’s skillful brushstrokes, all suggesting a forgery. The perspective also appears slightly off as the road fades into the back, generally lacking Canino’s more natural and organic style. A subject of interest is the signature, which does not match the artist’s original. Comparing this to Leon Guiseppe Buono’s faux signature, it is a detail that can often indicate forgery.
- L. G. Buono, Country Landscape
Date: 21st century; Forgery of Leon Giuseppe Buono (Italian, Naples 1888–1975 Pozzuoli)
Medium: Tempera on panel
Dimensions: 23.3 x 30.6 cm (9.1 x 12 in.)
Credit Line: Comando Carabinieri Tutela Patrimonio Culturale (TPC)
The Neapolitan artist Leon Giuseppe Buono was recognized for his ability to render detailed nostalgic natural scenes through expressive brushwork and a nuanced understanding of light and color. His works often highlight the dynamic between humanity and nature, with balanced cool and warm tones enhancing this thematic focus. This forgery fails to replicate Buono’s distinct tonal complexity and spatial coherence. Additionally, the signature diverges from authenticated examples; the exaggerated upward curve in the final “o” of “Buono” is inconsistent with his verified signatures, indicating falsification.