Debtors [VERIFIED]

In an effort to collect these debts, Commission personnel have sent letters, telephoned, and/or made personal contact with the debtors. In addition, those debtors who have reached bad debt status have been referred to the S.C. Department of Revenue for collection through the Set Off Debt Program and Governmental Enterprise Accounts Receivable Collections (GEAR) Program. The current amount of penalty due may differ from the judgment amount as a result of partial payments or accrual of additional penalty. Since the last update, some taxpayers may have resolved their debts listed below and may be in the process of being removed from this list.

State of New Jersey

Department of the Treasury

Division of Taxation

P.O. Box 269

Trenton, NJ 08695-0269

About the Top Debtors Listings

We publish information pertaining to the largest uncollected tax liabilities owed to us. All detail provided on our website is public information as a result of us, the Division of Taxation, having a docketed judgment filed with the New Jersey Superior Court. Debtor information may also be obtained directly from the Superior Court at phone number (609) 421-6100.

Each debtor appearing on these lists was notified of the docketed judgment by First-Class Mail and given an opportunity to resolve the outstanding tax liability and avoid appearing on this list. The current amount of tax, penalty and interest due may differ from the docketed judgment amount as a result of partial payments made against the judgment amount and/or accrual of additional penalty and interest. In addition, debtors may appear that have resolved the liability since their appearance on this list and are in the process of being removed.

Debtors appearing in these listings are encouraged to contact us to make arrangements for payment by calling (609) 943-5000. We will continue to provide all taxpayers with the information and assistance necessary to comply with their tax responsibilities.

Largest Business Taxpayers

Largest Individual Taxpayers

Debtors

Download 🔥 https://cinurl.com/2y7YAk 🔥

The Debtor Assistance Project ("DAP") is a legal clinic that is a partnership between the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland and various members of the Maryland legal community. This program provides debtors with an opportunity to meet, one-on-one, with a volunteer bankruptcy attorney for a free half-hour consultation. The DAP provides legal advice to individuals without an attorney by answering their questions about bankruptcy, including how bankruptcy may be used to help prevent foreclosure. The DAP cannot provide an attorney to complete your paperwork for you or represent you.

In response, since 2009, the ACLU and ACLU affiliates across the country have been exposing and challenging modern-day debtors' prisons, and urging governments and courts to pursue more rational and equitable approaches to criminal justice debt.

Debtors' prisons impose devastating human costs. They lead to coercive debt collection, forcing poor people to forgo the basic necessities of life in order to avoid arrest and jailing. Debtors' prisons waste taxpayer money and resources by jailing people who may never be able to pay their debts. This imposes direct costs on the government and further destabilizes the lives of poor people struggling to pay their debts and leave the criminal justice system behind. And most troubling, debtors' prisons create a racially-skewed, two-tiered system of justice in which the poor receive harsher, longer punishments for committing the same crimes as the rich, simply because they are poor.

Ultimately, debtors' prisons are not only unfair and insensible, they are also illegal. Imprisoning someone because she cannot afford to pay court-imposed fines or fees violates the Fourteenth Amendment promises of due process and equal protection under the law.

The ACLU and ACLU affiliates are uncovering how debtors' prisons across the country undermine the criminal justice system and threaten civil rights and civil liberties. We are working in state legislatures and courts, and with judicial officials to end these practices once and for all.

This ACLU report presents the results of a year-long investigation into modern-day debtors' prisons in Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, Washington, and Georgia. It shows that poor defendants are being jailed at increasingly alarming rates for failing to pay legal debts, creating a racially-skewed, two-tiered system of justice that violates the basic constitutional rights of poor people. The report documents the realities of today's debtors' prisons, and provides state and local governments and courts with recommendations for pursuing sensible and fair approaches to collecting criminal justice debt.

In 2014, the ACLU of Colorado sent letters to three cities, demanding a stop to the issuance of "pay-or-serve" warrants. These warrants had led to the arrest and jailing of poor people struggling to pay criminal justice debt without any consideration for, or inquiry into, their ability to pay. Through public education and advocacy, the ACLU of Colorado ultimately secured the passage of HB 1061, which was signed into law in May 2014 and now bans debtors' prisons in Colorado. Read more.

In 2013, the ACLU of Michigan, the Brennan Center for Justice, and the Michigan State Planning Body filed an amicus brief in a debtors' prison case before the Michigan Court of Appeals, urging the issuance of guidance to lower courts to prevent debtors' prison practices.

In the latest pushback against the national scourge of debtors' prisons, the American Civil Liberties Union filed an October 2015 federal lawsuit challenging the illegal arrest and jailing of poor people in Biloxi, Mississippi, without a hearing or representation by counsel. Victims are told they can avoid jail only if they pay the entire amount of outstanding court fines and fees up front, in full, and in cash.

The percentage of people living in poverty in Biloxi has doubled since 2009. Yet during this period, the city, through the Biloxi Municipal Court, has aggressively pursued court fines and fee payments from indigent people by issuing warrants when payments are missed. The warrants charge debtors with failure to pay, order their arrest and jailing in the Harrison County Adult Detention Center, and explicitly state that debtors can avoid jail only if they pay the full amount of fines and fees in cash. The complaint, Kennedy v. City of Biloxi, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi in Gulfport and cites violations of the U.S. Constitution's Fourth and 14th Amendments. Read more.

In 2013, the ACLU of Ohio issued Outskirts of Hope, a report documenting blatantly illegal debtors' prisons around the state. In response, the Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice announced reforms to educate local courts on how to protect indigent defendants' rights. In February 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio released a new "bench card" giving much-needed instructions to Ohio judges to explain how to avoid debtors' prison practices in their courtrooms. Read more.

In the latest front in the nationwide fight against debtors' prisons, on June 1, 2017, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a proposed class action lawsuit in federal court to challenge the illegal arrest and incarceration of poor people in Lexington County, South Carolina, without a hearing or representation by counsel. Victims can avoid jail only if they pay the entire amount of outstanding court fines and fees up front and in full. Indigent people who are unable to pay are incarcerated for weeks to months without ever seeing a judge, having a court hearing, or receiving help from a lawyer.

This is an important issue in business rescue because most financially distressed companies have an overdraft facility with a bank which is secured by a cession of debtors. Many practitioners want or need to use the overdraft facility as working capital.

The cessionary in this type of cession is not required to give notice to the cedent's debtors. The cessionary merely holds this cession as security, extinguished book debts being replaced by new ones all the time. In Grobbelaar v Oosthuizen 2009 (5) SA 500 (SCA) the court held that in a case of an outright cession, the cedent loses all his rights by transferring those rights to a cessionary and nothing remains vested in the cedent after cession (see paragraph 8). This was supported in the judgement of Kritzinger and Another v Standard Bank of South Africa (3034/2013) [2013] ZAFFHS 215 (19 September 2013) (the Kritzinger case).

In other words, the business rescue practitioner may not dispose of or encumber property without the secured creditor's consent, unless the proceeds are sufficient to discharge the indebtedness to the secured creditor and are actually paid to it immediately. It is our view that section 134 is not applicable to a cession of debtors. A debt owing to the company in rescue is not "property" within the meaning of section 134 because:

In our view, it is clear that business rescue practitioners may not lawfully suspend a cession of book debts (or for that matter any security right which a bank may enjoy). In our opinion, there is nothing untoward about a practitioner collecting book debts from the company's debtors into the company's bank account held with the cessionary bank, and then using the proceeds to pay the company's operational costs and costs of business rescue. However, it is entirely inappropriate for the practitioner to divert the funds collected from debtors to an account with another bank.

On November 11, 2022 and November 14, 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. and 101 affiliated debtors (collectively, the "Debtors") each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. On February 13, 2023, an order was entered at Docket No. 711 dismissing the cases of SNG Investments Yatirim Ve Danismanlik Anonim Sirketi (Case No. 22-11093) and FTX Turkey Teknoloji Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi (Case No. 22-11170). On August 18, 2023, an order was entered at Docket No. 2207 dismissing the case of FTX Exchange FZE (Case No. 22-11100). On November 13, 2023, an order was entered at Docket No. 3739 dismissing the cases of Liquid Financial USA, Inc. (Case No. 22-11151), LiquidEX LLC (Case No. 22-11152), Zubr Exchanged Ltd (Case No. 22-11132) and DAAG Trading, DMCC (Case No. 22-11163). The remaining cases are pending before the Honorable John T. Dorsey and are jointly administered under Case No. 22-11068. 006ab0faaa