Dayin Zhang

Grainger Hall 5261, 

975 University Avenue, 

Madison, WI 53706

I am an assistant professor in the Department of Real Estate and Urban Land Economics, Wisconsin School of Business. My research interests broadly lie in the intersection between financial intermediation and household finance. I earned my Ph.D. in Finance and Real Estate at the Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley.

News! A new working paper "How Do Labor Shortages Affect Residential Construction and Housing Affordability?" is posted at SSRN.

News! I will present "Mortgage Lenders’ Diversity Policies and Mortgage Lending to Minorities" at the AREUEA National Conference (Washington, DC, May 30).


Publications

[Abstract] In June 2020, the U.S. faced a surge in cases of COVID-19. Immediately prior to this wave of cases, the largest mass protests in U.S. history took place. We show that when holding other factors constant, COVID-19 cases increased most in places where more demonstrations occurred. We exploit variation in rainfall during the protest period as an exogenous source of variation in attendance. We find that good weather coincides with both more people protesting and more subsequent COVID-19 cases and deaths. Thus, mass gatherings during a pandemic can lead to more contraction and fatalities of COVID-19, and we quantify these effects.

[Abstract] Flooding remains the most destructive and costliest natural hazard. Among the 371 billion-dollar climate disasters in the US since 1980, 288 (78%) are directly related to flooding. And they cost 1.37 trillion in losses (in 2023 dollars adjusted by CPI) and 9,722 in fatalities. With climate change and sea level rising, floods are becoming more and more frequent and costly. The pressing issue is how we manage the flood risk. The current risk management framework in the US, designed and implemented by the government, has three fundamental pillars: Flood Risk Information Infrastructure, Flood Insurance, and Government Aid. The first pillar, the Flood Risk Information Infrastructure, guides decision-making using FEMA flood maps that visually depict flood risks. The second pillar, Flood Insurance, managed by the National Flood Insurance Program since 1968, aids in addressing ex ante flood-related financial risks. The third pillar, Government Aid, provides post-flood support through programs such as FEMA’s IHP and the Small Business Administration’s disaster loans. Though vital for flood risk mitigation and economic decision-making, each pillar confronts multiple challenges. FEMA flood maps, as the foundational pillar, face challenges in mapping accuracy, update regularity, and coverage, suggesting a need for ongoing innovation and cooperation among government agencies, research entities, and private sectors. The second pillar, FEMA flood insurance, has its issues too. Its pricing, marked by a multifaceted risk rating system, often doesn't mirror actual loss potential, leading to criticisms. Despite its role as a financial buffer, flood insurance's limited coverage and low adoption rates highlight public reluctance toward it. Government aid, the third pillar, while meant for post-disaster recovery, carries unintended side effects such as spatial discrepancies, increased inequalities, and potential deterrence from buying insurance, underscoring the delicate balance between policies and societal impacts. Furthermore, the interplay between the three pillars also creates enormous complexity in practice and might create unintended consequences. One example is the free-riding problem due to the coexistence of ex ante flood insurance and ex post government aid. Therefore, it is crucial to provide a comprehensive overview of the flood risk management system for both academics and policymakers.

Working Papers

Previously circulated as "The Importance of Immigrant Workers for American Homebuilding"

[Abstract]   US housing markets have faced a secular shortage of housing supply in the past decade, contributing to a steady decline in housing affordability. Most supply-side explanations in the literature have tended to focus on the distortionary effect of local housing regulations. This paper provides novel evidence on a less explored channel affecting housing supply: shortages of construction labor. We exploit the staggered rollout of a national increase in immigration enforcement to identify negative shocks to construction sector employment that are likely unrelated to local housing market conditions. Treated counties experience large and persistent reductions in construction workforce, residential homebuilding, and increases in home prices. Further, evidence suggests that undocumented labor is a complement to domestic labor: deporting undocumented construction workers reduces labor supplied by domestic construction workers on both extensive and intensive margins. 

Media coverage: Bloomberg

Gregory Chow Best Paper Award, CES North America Conference, 2020

Honorable Mention of the Homer Hoyt Doctoral Dissertation Award, AREUEA, 2021

[Abstract] Several wholesale funding markets are dominated by government agencies such as the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), which collectively channel hundreds of billions of dollars into the banking sector every year. Proponents of this intervention argue that it lowers retail borrowing costs significantly. This paper exploits quasi-experimental variation in access to low-cost wholesale funding from the FHLB arising from banks mergers, and shows that access to this funding source is associated with an 18-basis-point reduction in a bank's mortgage rates and a 16.3% increase in mortgage lending. This effect is 25% stronger for small community banks. At the market level, a census tract experiences an increase in local competition after a local bank joins the FHLB, with the market concentration index (HHI) falling by 1.5 percentage points. This intensified local competition pushes other lenders to lower their mortgage rates by 7.4 basis points, and overall market lending grows by 5%. Estimates of a structural model of the US mortgage market imply that the FHLB increases annual mortgage lending in the US by $50 billion, and saves borrowers $4.7 billion in interest payments every year, mainly through changing the competitive landscape of the mortgage market.

[Abstract] We investigate commercial mortgages for retail properties following the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employing a novel instrumental variable (IV) strategy. Utilizing exogenous geographic variations in COVID-19 spread induced by different rainfall levels during Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests, we find that the spread of COVID-19 results in reduced customer visits to retail stores, leading to a surge in financial distress for retail property owners. Subsequently, we observe an increase in business closures in defaulted retail properties in the following year, particularly in areas where tenant eviction moratoriums are not enforced. Our findings suggest that (1) the pandemic would lead to a substantial surge of mortgage defaults if there was no debt forbearance; and (2) the financial pressures on landlords with defaulted mortgages lead to more stringent eviction practices against distressed tenants. The adverse real impact on local businesses could be alleviated through either debt forbearance or eviction moratorium policies.

[Abstract] Credit default swaps (CDSs) create side bets on the underlying assets, where CDS traders have an incentive to manipulate the fundamental assets' performance. Focusing on the private mortgage securitization market, we empirically find that mortgage pools have 4% more mortgage refinance and 2% less default if they are covered by CDSs. We further explore the local randomization due to the discontinuous sale of mortgages by their originators, to establish a causal relationship between CDS coverage and mortgage refinance and default performance. The difference is largely driven by the cases in which the CDS seller and mortgage servicer are in the same financial holding company.  These empirical patterns suggest that CDS seller is unloading their credit risk by helping borrowers refinance their mortgages through the affiliated servicers. Our paper provides direct evidence that credit derivatives can affect fundamental assets through ex-post actions of derivative traders, which contaminates the fairness of financial transactions. Furthermore, this match-fixing behavior through refinancing is more severe when credit derivatives are allowed to be sold to parties without insurable interests.

Work in Progress

Winner of Fall Research Competition ($48,119), UW-Madison, 2023

[Abstract] Flood risk poses a growing threat to economic activities and real estate in the US. Intuitively, both residential households and commercial businesses should gradually move out of flood zones, especially when those areas face increasing flood risk. However, we find a puzzling pattern that shows businesses in US grew 10\% faster in certain central business districts in the past two decades when those districts were designated as flood zones. We build a spatial model that explains this puzzle: Business misplacement in response to rising flood risk is due to a free riding problem, in which flood insurance is imperfectly enforced while governments provide financial aid to uninsured properties ex post. Our model predicts lower commercial rent after an area becomes a flood zone, matching price results we obtain from our empirical analysis. Finally, we quantify welfare losses of imperfect flood insurance enforcement using our model.

Center for Liberation, Anti-Racism & Belonging (C-LAB) Fellowship (Grant $7,000), 2023

[Abstract]  Growing attention has been placed on race-related differences in mortgage lending. Research suggests that minorities continue to face lower approval rates, and, if approved, higher interest rates, controlling for observable borrower and loan characteristics. We examine the role of diversity policies in mortgage lending disparities. We find that mortgage lenders with diversity policies have significantly lower race-related gaps in interest rates and closing costs. They also have a reduction in application completion gaps – with minority borrowers more likely to complete their applications. However, we find that lenders with diversity policies have larger race-related gaps in originations, driven by a larger approval rate gap. In additional analyses, we assess subsequent delinquencies to examine whether the diversity policy induces changes to minority borrower/loan quality, and find a lower delinquency rate for all borrowers, with a similar reduction for minority and majority borrowers. An event study design examining the initial adoption of diversity policies suggests that the increases in application completion and the reductions in approval are driven by diversity policy adoption. Together, our results suggest that diversity policies in part address race-related disparities in lending. However, the policies may have an unintended side effect, inducing wider loan approval and origination gaps.

[Abstract] This paper provides evidence that weakening power separation in the government reduces private investment. We study a wave of municipal leadership consolidation in China, during which the chief of the police department is appointed to be the adjunct supervisor of the courthouse. This concentration of executive and judicial powers leads to the aggressive increase of the police's law enforcement against private businesses for rent-seeking. Concerned about property right infringement in the future, businesses reduced their capital expenditure by 14.2% and R&D investment by 21.6%. They also splash out on developing relationships with government officials.