In my technical publishing workflow, I have done my very best to convince my clients of the beauty and efficiency of PDF commenting. And for those people who are my direct contacts, it works! They read my instructions, perhaps watch a quick tutorial video, and they are faithfully using the commenting tools to mark up the documents I send them. But then comes the inevitable question: "How do I print out the document along with the comments?" While my client and I can see the comments just fine right within Acrobat, the backstory is that someone at his or her office (the boss) wants the hard copy of the document, complete with comments. Sigh...

The default print setting for Acrobat DC is to print the Document and Markups. My document is filled with red strike outs, blue replacement text indicators and red drawing lines. So when my client goes to print the commented document, the default setting (Document and Markups) (Figure 1) enables my client to print the markup indicators but not the actual replacement text (in the pop-up notes). This article details two different ways to print a document with comments (what's in the pop-up notes) and why one of those ways is so far superior to the other.


Download Google Doc To Pdf With Comments


Download Zip 🔥 https://bltlly.com/2y2Mcv 🔥



The most obvious way to accomplish this task is to print a document with comments. Go to File > Print. In the Print dialog box (Figure 2), there is a small button above the document preview: "Summarize Comments." There are a couple of things to take note of in this dialog box. Notice how there are 8 pages in this document. Now click on the Summarize Comments button.

The Create Content Summary dialog box gives you a variety of options to suit your needs. You can choose between four different layouts of how you want your comments displayed. Notice how the icons to the left of the bullet points change to illustrate each layout.

Let's say you have filtered your comments, and you want to create your comment summary with just the comments you've filtered. Well you can! Right within the Create Comment Summary dialog box, you can choose to include all the comments or just the ones currently showing (Figure 24). If you have multiple people who will be reviewing your document, it may be helpful to just include the comments that pertain to them.

My sample document has 8 pages, but only 5 of those pages have been commented. I can choose to include just the pages with comments, or to include all the pages, even those containing no comments (Figure 25). I can even specify a page range.

Famed MIT professor Hal Abelson said: "Programs must be written for people to read and only incidentally for machines to execute." While he may have purposely understated the importance of running code, he is spot on that programs have two very different audiences. Compilers and interpreters ignore comments and find all syntactically correct programs equally easy to understand. Human readers are very different. We find some programs harder to understand than others, and we look to comments to help us make sense of them.

Many junior programmers write too many comments because they were trained to do so by their introductory instructors. I've seen students in upper-division computer science classes add a comment to each closed brace to indicate what block is ending:

I've also heard of instructors requiring students to comment every line of code. While this may be a reasonable policy for extreme beginners, such comments are like training wheels and should be removed when bicycling with the big kids.

Another misuse of comments is to provide information that should have been in the code. A simple example is when someone names a variable with a single letter and then adds a comment describing its purpose:

Sometimes it's necessary to check in code even though it has known limitations. While it can be tempting not to share known deficiencies in one's code, it is better to make these explicit, such as with a TODO comment:

I hope the above examples have shown that comments don't excuse or fix bad code; they complement good code by providing a different type of information. As Stack Overflow co-founder Jeff Atwood has written, "Code Tells You How, Comments Tell You Why."

Comments are a great way to give contextual feedback and allows you to see the history of your discussion in the file. You can also tag a specific person with an @mention and they can respond to you within the file the next time they view it.

Linda is a part of the Morale Committee at work and has been tasked with leading the planning of the company's annual team-building trip this year. She's got plenty of ideas, but first she has to get them organized.

Linda opens the Excel app on her PC and creates a spreadsheet with the dates of the trip. Then she adds in her ideas for activities and dining options for each day. After getting her initial thoughts down, she saves the file to her OneDrive.

Later that day Inga sees that Linda has shared her ideas with her, but she has the day off. Even though she doesn't have a work laptop at home, she can still access and edit the document using Excel for the web. She adds a comment with an @mention for Linda, "I'm very afraid of water. How about some hiking instead of a cruise?"

Linda is in the waiting room at the dentist. She gets notifications about the @mentions on her mobile phone. Using the Excel mobile app, she opens the spreadsheet and reads the comments that Inga and Todd have left for her. She responds to the comment thread Inga started, "Hiking sounds good to me." She changes the activity in the spreadsheet from a cruise to hiking.

Linda sees that Todd is still in the file. She responds to his comment, "Actually this particular steakhouse is well known for it's vegetarian and vegan options as well! If Alice is not okay with it still, we can look into other options."

JSON is a data format that is common in configuration files like package.json or project.json. We also use it extensively in Visual Studio Code for our configuration files. When opening a file that ends with .json, VS Code provides features to make it simpler to write or modify the file's content.

In addition to the default JSON mode following the JSON specification, VS Code also has a JSON with Comments (jsonc) mode. This mode is used for the VS Code configuration files such as settings.json, tasks.json, or launch.json. When in the JSON with Comments mode, you can use single line (//) as well as block comments (/* */) as used in JavaScript. The mode also accepts trailing commas, but they are discouraged and the editor will display a warning.

To understand the structure of JSON files, we use JSON schemas. JSON schemas describe the shape of the JSON file, as well as value sets, default values, and descriptions. The JSON support shipped with VS Code supports all draft versions from draft 4 to draft 7, with limited support for drafts 2019-09 and 2020-12.

To map a schema that is located in the workspace, use a relative path. In this example, a file in the workspace root called myschema.json will be used as the schema for all files ending with .foo.json.

The file match syntax supports the '*' wildcard. Also, you can define exclusion patterns, starting with '!'. For an association to match, at least one pattern needs to match and the last matching pattern must not be an exclusion pattern.

Comments provide a powerful way to drive discussion around content in your Box account. Use comments to request feedback from others, make notes to yourself, notify others of updates to a file, and a variety of other social interactions.

You can view comments in the Preview page of a file within the sidebar to the right, or post your own in the "Write a comment" box at the bottom. Collaborators in that folder can reply directly to a comment or add their own comments.

For any Pull Request, GitHub provides three kinds of comment views:comments on the Pull Request as a whole, comments on a specific line within the Pull Request,and comments on a specific commit within the Pull Request.

Each of these types of comments goes through a different portion of the GitHub API.In this guide, we'll explore how you can access and manipulate each one. For everyexample, we'll be using this sample Pull Request made on the "octocat"repository. As always, samples can be found in our platform-samples repository.

To access comments on a Pull Request, you'll use the endpoints to manage issues.This may seem counterintuitive at first. But once you understand that a PullRequest is just an Issue with code, it makes sense to use these endpoints tocreate comments on a Pull Request.

Here, we're specifically calling out to the API to get the comments (issue_comments),providing both the repository's name (octocat/Spoon-Knife), and the Pull Request IDwe're interested in (1176). After that, it's simply a matter of iterating throughthe comments to fetch information about each one.

Within the diff view, you can start a discussion on a particular aspect of a singularchange made within the Pull Request. These comments occur on the individual lineswithin a changed file. The endpoint URL for this discussion comes from the endpoint to manage pull request reviews.

You'll notice that it's incredibly similar to the example above. The differencebetween this view and the Pull Request comment is the focus of the conversation.A comment made on a Pull Request should be reserved for discussion or ideas onthe overall direction of the code. A comment made as part of a Pull Request review shoulddeal specifically with the way a particular change was implemented within a file.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The renowned site of Dmanisi in Georgia, southern Caucasus (ca. 1.8 Ma) yielded the earliest direct evidence of hominin presence out of Africa. In this paper, we report on the first record of a large-sized canid from this site, namely dentognathic remains, referable to a young adult individual that displays hypercarnivorous features (e.g., the reduction of the m1 metaconid and entoconid) that allow us to include these specimens in the hypodigm of the late Early Pleistocene species Canis (Xenocyon) lycaonoides. Much fossil evidence suggests that this species was a cooperative pack-hunter that, unlike other large-sized canids, was capable of social care toward kin and non-kin members of its group. This rather derived hypercarnivorous canid, which has an East Asian origin, shows one of its earliest records at Dmanisi in the Caucasus, at the gates of Europe. Interestingly, its dispersal from Asia to Europe and Africa followed a parallel route to that of hominins, but in the opposite direction. Hominins and hunting dogs, both recorded in Dmanisi at the beginning of their dispersal across the Old World, are the only two Early Pleistocene mammal species with proved altruistic behaviour towards their group members, an issue discussed over more than one century in evolutionary biology. ff782bc1db

mobile de

download abc print font

nbf download centre

modern combat 4

download language in google translate