This paper proposes the Divine Information System (DIS) framework as an analogical model for integrating scientific mechanisms with theological meaning. By integrating modern information science, this study explores how natural systems exhibit information-driven order—from cosmic order to biological complexity—revealing precision and coordination consistent with the expression of an inherent, divinely purposeful order through natural processes. Contemporary technologies, through quantum information theory and artificial intelligence, offer illustrative models for understanding divine attributes and actions, providing new perspectives without reducing theology to mechanistic processes. To avoid reductionism, the DIS framework employs safeguards to ensure that divine transcendence remains distinct from computational models and physical processes. By mapping theological “why” questions onto scientific “how” questions through information concepts, the framework promotes dialogue that respects both empirical observation and theological reflection. It offers a unifying perspective in which meaning and mechanism are not in conflict but rather inform each other, thereby promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and practical applications in theological education, ethics, and the dialogue between science and faith.
Keywords: Divine Information System (DIS), Science and Theology, Information Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Theology, Quantum Information and Divine Action, Epistemology and Revelation, Purpose in Creation, Interdisciplinary Dialogue, Biblical Information Framework, Science-Faith Integration
The dialogue between science and theology is often described as conflicting—where scientific explanations of cause-and-effect seem incompatible with theological interpretations of purpose. However, this apparent disagreement stems more from disciplinary conventions than actual contradictions. Science excels at uncovering how natural systems operate through mechanisms and patterns, while theology seeks to understand the significance, meaning, and ultimate intention behind these systems. Rather than viewing them in competition, this study introduces a framework of complementarity: the Divine Information System (DIS).
Rooted in information theory, the DIS framework suggests that structured, meaningful, and functionally effective information provides a conceptual bridge between scientific and theological perspectives. From the cosmic structures revealed in physics to the genetic encoding of biological systems, natural phenomena can be understood not only through mechanistic functions but as carriers of deeper, divinely embedded purpose.
This study begins by exploring the relationship between “how” and “why” questions and argues that information serves as a bridge concept linking physical mechanisms and theological meaning. Drawing on insights from physics, biology, and the Bible, the chapters trace how natural systems—from planetary motion to DNA—display an informational architecture that aligns with biblical themes of creation, wisdom, and relationality.
The paper then develops this framework through analogies drawn from quantum information theory and artificial intelligence, demonstrating how emerging technologies offer new ways of articulating divine action while avoiding an overly mechanistic view of God’s interaction with creation. To preserve theological integrity, the study outlines safeguards against over-technologizing divine agency and clarifies the role of information as an analogical tool, rather than a literal description of divine nature.
This analogy-based approach offers several advantages to the science-theology dialogue. It provides contemporary metaphors for traditional theological concepts without reducing them to mechanistic models. It highlights parallels between natural systems and biblical descriptions while maintaining a balance between empirical observation and theological reflection.
Ultimately, the DIS framework demonstrates how information science offers valuable conceptual models for understanding divine-creation relationships in Scripture. It serves as an interpretive bridge between scientific and theological perspectives, showing how information connects mechanism with meaning, process with purpose, and structure with significance—without collapsing theology into computational terms.
Science and theology provide distinct perspectives on reality—science explains mechanisms (“how”), while theology explores purpose (“why”). Traditionally, these viewpoints were seen as competing, but modern discussions reveal their complementarity.
This chapter introduces the Divine Information System (DIS) framework, demonstrating how structured information connects scientific mechanisms to theological meaning. We begin by exploring the relationship between “how” and “why” questions, then introduce information as a bridging concept, showing how it links material causality with intentional design. By integrating insights from physics, biology, and theology, we develop a cohesive framework that respects both scientific rigor and theological depth.
1.1 Complementary Perspectives on Science and Theology
Scientific Inquiry and the “How” Questions
Science excels at answering "how" questions through observation, experimentation, and mathematical modeling, uncovering mechanisms behind natural phenomena. Its strength lies in commitment to evidence and testable theories, developing models that explain and predict system functions.
However, science has inherent limitations, focusing on mechanisms rather than ultimate purpose. This reflects science’s specific role in human understanding rather than representing a weakness.
Theological Inquiry and the “Why” Questions
Theology approaches reality from a different perspective, addressing questions of purpose, meaning, and value. Rather than seeing the universe merely as a chain of cause-and-effect relationships, theology understands creation as an intentional act, expressing divine wisdom and purpose.
In biblical narratives, creation represents purposeful divine action with distinct goals: bringing order from chaos, sustaining life, and enabling relationship with the Creator. Theological inquiry explores ultimate origins, purpose, and significance beyond scientific methodology
Historian Peter Harrison demonstrates that the perceived conflict between science and religion is largely a modern construction, arguing that historical analysis reveals these domains as having distinct but complementary territories rather than inherently opposing methodologies (Harrison 2015). This historical perspective supports the DIS framework’s approach of seeking integration rather than assuming conflict between scientific and theological inquiry.
1.2 Information as a Bridging Concept
Among concepts that might connect scientific and theological perspectives, information holds unique potential due to its bridging nature—connecting physical mechanisms with meaning and purpose. This makes information particularly suited to addressing both “how” questions in science and “why” questions in theology.
Defining Information in the Divine Information System (DIS) Framework
For this study, we define information as structured data that exhibits three essential characteristics: (1) syntactic organization—patterns that can be encoded, transmitted, and decoded; (2) semantic content—meaningful relationships, within the DIS framework, are understood to convey a divinely intended purpose. This purpose may be latent or potential within the mere structure, becoming fully apparent through interaction and interpretation, but is posited as originating from the Creator; and (3) functional effectiveness—the capacity to influence or coordinate system behavior. While science focuses on how natural systems are structured and function, the DIS framework examines the deeper meaning embedded within them—pointing to divine intent. Rather than meaning being imposed onto creation, it is an inherent part of its informational design, waiting to be discovered. This tripartite definition allows information to serve as a bridge concept because it encompasses both the mechanistic patterns that science studies (syntax and function) and the purposeful meaning that theology explores (semantics and ultimate function).
This understanding builds upon Claude Shannon’s foundational work on information transmission (Shannon 1948) while extending beyond purely quantitative measures to include qualitative dimensions of meaning and purpose. Unlike purely materialist approaches in information theory that reduce information to statistical patterns, or purely idealist approaches that separate meaning from physical substrates, our definition recognizes information's intrinsic nature—it requires physical manifestation yet transcends purely material properties.
Information in Scientific and Theological Understanding
Information theory is fundamental to contemporary science, shaping fields from quantum mechanics to biotechnology. As physicist John Wheeler’s information theory principle “It from Bit” suggests, physical reality may originate from fundamental information rather than information simply describing reality (Wheeler 1990). This perspective suggests that information may be more fundamental than matter or energy, prompting significant reconsideration of the structure and assumptions that underline our metaphysical frameworks.
In biology, DNA functions as a biological information system that revolutionized our understanding of life. Biologist Richard Dawkins notes, “The machine code of the genes is uncannily computer-like” (Dawkins 1989). With approximately 3 billion base pairs, the human genome encodes functional data equivalent to 750 megabytes, governing development, reproduction, and biochemical processes. Biological information systems increasingly replace purely mechanistic explanations, providing a more integrative view across biological disciplines.
Theological traditions have long recognized information concepts, though often using different terminology. John’s Gospel opens with “In the beginning was the Word” (John 1:1), where the Greek “Logos” encompasses meaning, ordering principle, and divine reason. This suggests that information precedes and generates physical reality, expressing a fundamentally theological understanding.
Scripture consistently presents divine knowledge as central, with passages describing informational awareness: “You know when I sit down and when I rise up; you discern my thoughts from far away” (Psalm 139:2 NRSV) and “before him no creature is hidden” (Hebrews 4:13 NRSV).
Contemporary theology explores how information can exist independently of physical form, providing analogies for divine activity. Since information, though not itself physical, can exist and profoundly affect the material world, it offers a conceptual model for understanding how God—as pure spirit—might interact with creation through informational rather than merely physical means.
Theologian Celia Deane-Drummond affirms that information concepts can aid theological insight when used analogically. In Christ and Evolution, she cautions against reducing divine wisdom to computational models, emphasizing that it both transcends and shapes natural informational processes (Deane-Drummond 2009, 178–182). Her approach supports the DIS framework’s use of information theory as a bridge between theology and science, not a literal map of divine action.
Information as a Mediating Concept
Information is uniquely suited as a bridge concept because it is neither purely physical nor purely conceptual but exists at the intersection of the two. Information requires a physical basis for transmission, but it conveys meaning that transcends physical properties.
Philosopher Michael Polanyi called such ideas “boundary concepts,” connecting different domains of knowledge (Polanyi 1966). Computer scientist Noreen Herzfeld expands on this idea: “Information provides a framework embracing both scientific and theological descriptions of reality, making them complementary rather than conflicting” (Herzfeld 2002).
Scholars have explored information concepts in theology, though not always systematically. John Polkinghorne examines how information might persist beyond physical decay, offering a framework for resurrection (Polkinghorne 2002). Arthur Peacocke developed an information-based model of divine action, explaining how God interacts with nature without violating physical causality (Peacocke 1993). Philip Clayton uses emergence theory to propose an information-based view of divine action (Clayton 2004), while Paul Davies explores how information concepts bridge physics and metaphysics (Davies 2010).
The Divine Information System (DIS) framework builds upon these insights to develop a more integrated approach, applying David Tracy’s “mutually critical correlation” method (Tracy 1996) while maintaining disciplinary boundaries and seeking mutual enrichment.
Having established information as a bridging concept that connects mechanism with meaning, this chapter examines how natural information systems demonstrate properties that science has revealed. We explore how the universe exhibits remarkable order and structure across multiple scales—from cosmic architecture to ecological networks to biological systems. Following the sequence of creation described in Genesis, we begin with the foundational cosmic order, then examine planetary ecological systems, and finally explore the sophisticated biological information processing that emerges within this framework. These observations reveal natural mechanisms that process, store, and transmit information in ways that parallel human-designed information systems.
2.1 Cosmic Order and Information Flow
At the most fundamental level, viewing the universe as a natural information system helps us understand its internal order and coordination. The cosmos—an immense network of galaxies, stars, and planets—exhibits remarkable predictability and interconnection, resembling an engineered system where physical laws function in a manner analogous to information protocols within an engineered system. This cosmic foundation establishes the basic parameters within which all other natural information systems operate.
Planetary orbits are governed by gravity and physical laws, following precise and predictable paths. Within the solar system, planetary motion follows gravitational interactions and stable astronomical laws that regulate celestial movement like system protocols.
Phenomena such as gravitational waves, stellar radiation, and tidal forces between planets can be interpreted as channels of information exchange—physical interactions that influence other celestial bodies, allowing synchronized movements over vast distances.
The laws regulating planetary motion also apply on larger cosmic scales—governing stellar dynamics within galaxies and controlling interactions between galactic clusters. This consistency suggests a universal organizing principle providing the stable foundation for planetary and biological systems.
2.2 Ecological Information Networks
Building upon the cosmic foundation, planetary ecosystems operate as sophisticated natural information systems at an intermediate scale. Ecological networks regulate energy flow, material cycling, and species interactions—exhibiting characteristics similar to designed information management systems that operate within the stable cosmic framework established by universal laws.
Biogeochemical cycles function as planetary data streams, with carbon, nitrogen, water, and oxygen cycles maintaining balance through feedback mechanisms. When CO₂ levels rise, plant growth accelerates, forming negative feedback loops that regulate the cycle (Schlesinger & Bernhardt 2013).
Species interactions create communication networks transmitting critical information throughout ecosystems. The “wood wide web”—the underground mycorrhizal fungal network connecting trees and plants—enables trees to share resources and send warnings about insect attacks, functioning as a natural information exchange system with recent research revealing how these networks exhibit learning and memory capabilities (Simard 2021). This biological networking demonstrates how life has developed sophisticated information sharing within Earth’s ecological framework.
Animal communication systems provide another example of natural information processing. Honeybees use the “waggle dance” to convey precise details about food sources, including direction, distance, and quality—a sophisticated coding system that follows standardized transmission protocols, with recent research revealing how bees dynamically adjust their communication strategies based on information reliability (Grüter and Ratnieks 2011). These communication systems rely on the predictable cosmic cycles of day and night, seasonal changes, and stable environmental conditions.
2.3 Biological Information Processing
At the most sophisticated level within this hierarchical information architecture, biological systems demonstrate extraordinary complexity while operating within both the ecological and cosmic frameworks previously described. Genetic coding serves as nature’s most advanced storage and transmission system, remarkably similar to human-designed information systems yet far exceeding them in elegance and efficiency.
DNA functions as nature’s most sophisticated information system, using a quaternary code where four nucleotides (A, T, G, C) form three-letter codons encoding protein synthesis. This genetic code exhibits optimal error-correction properties while enabling beneficial variation. The molecular process—DNA to RNA to proteins—mirrors computational data flow from storage to processing to output.
The immune system exemplifies advanced biological information processing, maintaining databases of molecular patterns and using memory cells for rapid pathogen responses (Janeway et al. 2001).
The nervous system represents the pinnacle of biological information processing. The human brain's 86 billion neurons process sensory data, store memories, and generate behaviors through electrochemical networks, with information theory revealing computational principles behind perception and cognition (Tononi 2008).
The DIS framework reveals how the progression from cosmic protocols through ecological networks to biological sophistication demonstrates hierarchical information architecture where each level builds upon and depends on the previous levels, creating an integrated system of remarkable complexity and purposefulness.
This chapter explores the theological “why” questions that correspond to the scientific “how” questions discussed in Chapter 2. While the previous chapter examined how natural systems exhibit DIS-like mechanisms, progressing from cosmic order through ecological networks to biological sophistication, we follow the same sequence to explore Biblical narratives that reveal the divine purpose behind these mechanisms. We seek to understand why the universe exhibits extraordinary order and structure, why Earth maintains ecological balance, and why human biological systems demonstrate intricate coordination—following the creation sequence that moves from cosmic foundations to ecological stewardship to human relationship with the Creator.
3.1 The Purpose of Creation: Meaningful Divine Order
Corresponding to the cosmic order revealed by science, biblical narratives explain the foundational divine purpose behind universal information architecture. Genesis describes creation as purposeful rather than accidental: “God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good” (Genesis 1:31 NRSV). The cosmic order established through divine speech—“And God said... and it was so” (Genesis 1 NRSV)—demonstrates intentional design rather than mechanical processes.
The celestial systems serve as “for signs and for seasons and for days and years” (Genesis 1:14 NRSV), functioning as instruments of divine communication proclaiming God’s glory (Psalm 19:1 NRSV). The DIS framework shows how cosmic regularities, interpreted as information protocols within the DIS framework, can be seen to serve theological purposes by revealing God's wisdom and intentionality through creation.
The structured operation of the universe serves a relational purpose beyond utility. Isaiah states, “he did not create it a chaos, he formed it to be inhabited!” (Isaiah 45:18 NRSV) The fine-tuning of physical constants—such as the precise strength of gravity enabling stable planetary orbits—suggests that the universe is calibrated to support life, reflecting God’s intentional design rather than arising from mere cosmic chance. This cosmic foundation provides the stable framework within which all subsequent ecological and biological purposes can be fulfilled.
3.2 Ecological Purpose: Stewardship and Sustenance
Moving from cosmic to ecological purposes, biblical narratives reveal why earth's ecosystems maintain the sophisticated balance that Chapter 2 described through DIS-like regulation mechanisms. These intermediate-scale systems exist not merely for functional balance, but for God and humanity to steward creation together. Genesis 1:28 and 2:15 define humanity’s stewardship role within this ecological framework: “The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to till it and keep it.” (Genesis 2:15 NRSV)
The DIS framework reveals how ecological cycles align with theological themes of sustenance. Scripture connects divine control of natural cycles with human faithfulness: “he draws up the drops of water... which the skies pour down” (Job 36:27-28 NRSV) and “he will give the rain for your land in its season” (Deuteronomy 11:13-14 NRSV). This suggests that ecosystems operate within a covenantal framework, responding not just to physical processes but also to human obedience, while depending on the reliable cosmic cycles that govern seasons and weather patterns.
The prophet Hosea describes how human unfaithfulness affects the land: “Therefore the land mourns, and all who live in it languish; together with the wild animals and the birds of the air, even the fish of the sea are perishing” (Hosea 4:3 NRSV). Such theological perspectives position ecosystems as active participants in God’s covenant with humanity—not merely mechanistic processes—demonstrating how ecological information networks serve relational and moral purposes within creation’s larger design.
Theologian Denis Edwards, an influential figure in ecological theology, emphasizes that creation’s ecological relationships reflect divine relationality itself, suggesting that natural information networks serve not merely functional purposes but express God’s love through interconnected systems (Edwards 2004). This theological perspective supports the DIS framework’s claim that ecological information processing serves relational purposes beyond mere sustainability.
Job 38-39 provides extensive biblical reflection on natural systems, with God questioning Job about creation’s operations. The purpose revealed isn’t just to demonstrate divine power but to place human understanding within proper limits. The complex ecological relationships described exist to maintain divine wisdom beyond human comprehension, requiring trust rather than complete understanding, while operating within the predictable cosmic order that enables life to flourish.
3.3 Human Design: Relationship and Redemption
Representing the highest integration of complexity and purpose, the biological sophistication described in Chapter 2 finds its fullest expression in human consciousness and divine relationship. The Bible reveals that these most sophisticated information-processing mechanisms serve not merely functional coordination, but the ultimate relational purposes of divine-human communion. Genesis 1:27 states that “God created mankind in his image,” symbolizing humanity’s capacity to receive, process, and respond to divine information within the ecological and cosmic framework that supports human life.
The DIS framework demonstrates how scientific findings in biological complexity—align with Biblical concepts of divine intentionality. The psalmist describes human development as divinely arranged: “For it was you who formed my inward parts; you knit me together in my mother’s womb” (Psalm 139:13 NRSV). This suggests that biological information systems operate under divine authorization, where each life has a specific purpose within creation’s comprehensive design.
The Bible shows that God communicates in many ways—verbally (including prayer), in dreams, in visions, and ultimately “by a Son” (Hebrews 1:2 NRSV)—which suggests that human systems are designed for multiple levels of divine contact.
The “Book of Life” highlights the purpose behind divine information management. Unlike mere data storage, Scripture presents this record as relational identification: “Rejoice that your names are written in heaven” (Luke 10:20 NRSV). Here, the preservation of identity serves covenantal relationships, ensuring that people are recognized, held accountable, and ultimately redeemed within the cosmic scope of God’s eternal purposes.
The promise of resurrection demonstrates the ultimate purpose of divine information preservation. Paul describes this transformation: “What is sown is perishable, what is raised is imperishable” (1 Corinthians 15:42 NRSV), highlighting that divine information management serves God’s redemptive plan, leading to the renewal of creation beyond mere preservation. This fulfillment aligns with the biblical vision of restoration, where resurrection not only transcends mortality but brings creation’s order and purpose to its intended completion in divine communion.
The progression from cosmic purpose through ecological stewardship to human relationship reveals a hierarchical purpose architecture where each level serves and prepares for the next, culminating in the restoration of all creation for eternal relationship with God.
Building upon our exploration of natural systems (Chapter 2) and biblical narratives (Chapter 3), this chapter leverages concepts from contemporary information science to further develop the DIS analogy as an interpretive framework. We examine how advancements in technology help connect scientific mechanisms with theological purpose through quantum information theory, artificial intelligence, and information system principles. These contemporary fields offer conceptual tools for understanding divine action and creation’s order, demonstrating how this integration helps connect scientific and theological perspectives without reducing either to the other.
4.1 The DIS Framework: Integrating “How” and “Why” Through Information
Unlike traditional either/or approaches that view scientific mechanisms and divine purposes as competing explanations, the DIS framework offers both/and integration, viewing scientific mechanisms as serving divine purposes through information processing. This shifts the conversation from competitive to complementary, where mechanisms and meaning work together rather than against each other.
The DIS framework provides concrete solutions to longstanding debates between science and faith. For example, the traditional tension asks: How can biological processes be both mechanistically explainable and purposefully designed? The DIS resolution demonstrates that biological information systems show sophisticated mechanisms serving higher purposes. DNA employs highly efficient error-correction mechanisms while allowing for natural variation, and cellular networks perform logical operations while maintaining health. This reveals information architecture integrating mechanical precision with functional purpose. As the psalmist declares “I am fearfully and wonderfully made” (Psalm 139:14 NRSV)—celebrating both the intricate mechanisms and purposeful design evident in biological systems.
4.2 “How” and “Why” in Information Systems
The DIS analogy provides a unique framework by recognizing that information inherently encompasses both mechanism and purpose, integrating scientific observations with theological meaning. In modern information systems, this dual nature is evident—data structures represent “how” processes work, while application contexts reveal “why” they exist. This analogy helps connect scientific descriptions of natural mechanisms with biblical explanations of divine intention.
Information science distinguishes between syntax (structural patterns) and semantics (meaningful content). In the DIS framework, science excels at elucidating the syntactic level—how natural systems process information—while biblical narratives primarily help illuminate and explain the pre-existing semantic level—the divine reasons these systems exist and function. From this perspective, theology helps discern the meaning that the Creator has embedded in the structure of his information, rather than simply imposing meaning from an external source. This unified perspective promotes complementary interpretations, where scientific and theological perspectives reinforce rather than compete.
For example, genetic information exhibits both syntactic precision (the chemical mechanism of DNA replication) and semantic salience (the purpose of biological reproduction). The extraordinary accuracy of DNA transcription reflects the “how” of information processing, while the orderly reproduction of life reflects the “why” statement in Genesis: “God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it’” (Genesis 1:28 NRSV).
Theologian John Haught argues that emergence in natural systems points toward divine purpose unfolding through time, where increasing complexity serves God’s aim of maximizing beauty and intensity of experience (Haught 2000). The DIS framework aligns with Haught’s insights by proposing that information complexity in biological and cosmic systems reflects divine intention for increasingly sophisticated forms of relationship and consciousness.
4.3 Quantum Information Theory and Divine Action
Quantum information theory offers rich analogies for understanding divine action within natural order, as quantum systems exhibit properties that resonate with theological concepts like transcendence and immanence, unlike classical mechanics.
Quantum Entanglement and Divine Omnipresence
Quantum entanglement describes a state where linked particles remain interconnected, their properties correlated instantaneously regardless of distance—a “non-local correlation” challenging classical spatial intuitions. Divine omnipresence refers to God’s undivided, sustaining presence throughout all creation, unconstrained by space. Entanglement provides a conceptual parallel, not by explaining omnipresence’s mechanism, but by illustrating how interconnectedness can transcend conventional spatial limits. This helps conceptualize divine immanence, as the psalmist expresses: “Where can I go from your spirit? Or where can I flee from your presence? If I ascend to heaven, you are there; if I make my bed in Sheol, you are there” (Psalm 139:7–8 NRSV).
However, this analogy is strictly limited. Entanglement involves correlations between physical entities, lacking consciousness, will, or the sustaining power of divine omnipresence. Divine omnipresence is not dependent on physical mechanisms, unlike entanglement. The analogy primarily stretches conceptual boundaries regarding presence, not equating a physical phenomenon with a divine attribute.
Superposition and Divine Will
Superposition in quantum mechanics is the principle where a physical system exists in multiple potential states simultaneously until measurement collapses it to a single definite state. Divine will concerns God’s purpose and agency, including how God acts or guides events, often considering creation’s integrity and creaturely freedom. Superposition offers a conceptual tool for theology by illustrating how physical reality is not always classically determined. This provides an imaginative space, as theologians like Polkinghorne suggest, for considering divine action in an “open” universe without violating physical laws, allowing divine intention to guide outcomes within nature’s inherent flexibilities.
This analogy remains abstract. Quantum superposition pertains to unobserved physical states and probabilities, whereas divine will involves consciousness, purpose, and moral agency—qualities absent in quantum mechanics. While quantum “openness” illustrates a flexible physical reality, it does not equate to divine freedom, nor does divine action function like a quantum measurement. Instead, its value lies in challenging rigid cause-and-effect assumptions, offering a conceptual space where nature allows for non-determined possibilities without contradicting divine intentionality.
Quantum Information Conservation and Divine Knowledge
Some quantum theories propose that the total quantum information in a closed, unitarily evolving system remains constant—information is transformed, not lost. Divine knowledge and sovereignty describe God’s encompassing awareness and providential governance, implying all events are within God’s knowing and purpose. The conservation of quantum information offers a suggestive, indirect parallel for the enduring nature of divine knowledge or creation’s ultimate meaningfulness. The idea that state information is never truly lost echoes the theological conviction of all things being present to divine awareness.
Critically, “information” in quantum theory is a mathematical specification of a quantum state, distinct from the semantic, experiential knowledge of divine omniscience. Theological concepts of divine knowledge and sovereignty transcend and do not depend on physical processes. The analogy is evocative, hinting at permanence within change, not explaining God’s knowledge.
These quantum insights are conceptual tools for considering divine action within natural laws, not proofs of theological claims. As Polkinghorne (2019) suggests, divine interaction with the material world, while potentially unpredictable by science, need not violate physical principles. Sarah Coakley’s (2013) work on divine action operating through emergent properties and natural complexity supports the DIS framework’s proposal that divine action occurs via information processing within natural order, not external intervention.
4.4 Artificial Intelligence: A Window into Divine Attributes
Information science developments in artificial intelligence provide valuable analogies for understanding divine attributes within the DIS framework as described in biblical narratives. AI demonstrates how vast knowledge processing and rapid decision-making operate within an information system, offering tangible parallels for conceptualizing divine attributes.
AI’s ability to process vast amounts of information instantly offers a conceptual parallel to divine omniscience. Scripture states that God knows “the end from the beginning” (Isaiah 46:10 NRSV) and “everything” (1 John 3:20 NRSV). While AI operates on a finite scale, its capability to analyze large-scale datasets helps us visualize how divine awareness might encompass all knowledge without sequential processing. Similarly, AI’s pattern recognition provides insights into divine wisdom, detecting complex relationships across extensive collections of data that align with biblical descriptions: “he knows the secrets of the heart” (Psalm 44:21 NRSV).
Additionally, advances in AI natural language processing provide relevant analogies for understanding divine communication. AI interprets context, meaning, and response generation, helping us conceptualize how God speaks through Scripture, creation, and providence. As John declares, “And the Word became flesh” (John 1:14 NRSV), divine communication goes beyond information transmission—it establishes relationships, something AI systems are only beginning to approximate.
Anthropomorphic Limitations and Appropriate Use of AI Analogies
While AI analogies provide valuable conceptual tools, AI systems are still limited human creations that operate within programmed parameters. Divine wisdom transcends these limitations entirely, encompassing moral, relational, and creative dimensions that AI cannot approach. As the Psalmist puts it, God’s “understanding is beyond measure” (Psalm 147:5 NRSV). AI analogies are not functional equivalents but conceptual bridges that help us understand how theological wisdom and creativity operate at an infinitely higher level through familiar technology as a reference.
Theologian Niels Henrik Gregersen’s concept of “deep incarnation” suggests that divine presence permeates natural information processes at the most fundamental levels, proposing that God’s incarnational presence extends beyond human nature to encompass all of creation’s information architecture (Gregersen 2010). This perspective enriches the DIS framework by suggesting that natural information systems don’t merely reflect divine intent but participate in divine presence itself.
4.5 From Concept to Application: Information and Theological Interpretation
Modern information science provides a flexible interpretive framework, accommodating both scientific observation and theological reflection. The DIS framework integrates insights from technology, physics, and theology without reducing divine action to mere computation.
Beyond Physical Limits: Cloud Computing and Divine Omnipresence
Cloud computing’s distributed nature offers an analogy for divine omnipresence—enabling seamless access across vast networks while theology explores how God’s presence transcends physical limitations.
Beyond Temporal Continuity: Databases and Divine Record-Keeping
Database integrity mechanisms provide insights into divine memory and personal continuity. Biblical “Book of Life” records emphasize relational identification rather than mere information storage.
Beyond Classical Constraints: Quantum Communication and Divine Revelation
Quantum physics demonstrates instantaneous information transfer, offering analogies for continuous divine-human interaction and God’s immediate relational communication.
By integrating information-based perspectives, we build a framework where scientific mechanisms serve theological purpose, meaning is embedded within structure, and divine intent manifests through natural laws. The DIS framework fosters meaningful interplay where science and theology illuminate each other through the lens of information.
This chapter explores how the DIS framework facilitates meaningful connections between science and faith, showing how information-based approaches reshape traditional conflicts and offer practical applications. While acknowledging the framework’s limitations, we emphasize its potential to foster interdisciplinary collaboration through the complementarity of mechanism and purpose.
5.1 Connecting Scientific Inquiry and Theological Meaning
The Divine Information System (DIS) framework demonstrates how scientific descriptions of mechanisms and theological insights on purpose can interact meaningfully. Instead of treating empirical observations and theological perspectives as opposing views, the DIS approach highlights their complementarity, showing that mechanisms serve divine purpose rather than standing alone.
Historically, science-theology discussions have sometimes framed natural laws as purely mechanistic, limiting consideration of divine intentionality within creation. However, the information-based approach presents a unifying framework where the universe’s ordered complexity reflects both structured mechanisms observed in science and intended purpose described in theology. The laws governing physical systems—from fine-tuned universal constants to biological information in DNA—are best understood not as random occurrences but as deliberate designs enabling life and interconnectivity.
Enriching Scientific Understanding
The DIS framework actively enriches scientific inquiry by demonstrating how theological perspectives contribute to research. While science typically operates under methodological naturalism without reference to purpose, the information perspective suggests that purpose-awareness can complement mechanism-centered exploration.
Purpose considerations refine scientific model development in several ways. Viewing biological systems as potentially purpose-driven raises new research questions about optimization and integration. When scientists recognize that biological information may serve relational purposes beyond survival, they identify overlooked patterns. As systems biologist Denis Noble states, “Purpose-related language in biology is not merely metaphorical—it often proves instrumental in understanding integrative functionality” (Noble 2016).
Theological insights into meaningful communication open new research directions, particularly in complexity studies. If biological information encodes meaningful design, scientists may search for features indicative of purpose-driven architectures. The field of bioinformatics has begun exploring whether biological systems contain informational patterns beyond mere randomness (Meyer 2009). Information-theoretic approaches to consciousness suggest that awareness involves both information processing (mechanism) and meaning-making (purpose), encouraging investigation of both dimensions simultaneously.
Deepening Theological Reflection
The DIS framework offers fresh pathways for theological reflection, providing modern metaphors that articulate long-standing doctrines in contemporary language. These analogies assist in communicating complex theological concepts with renewed clarity and relevance.
Information theory helps reframe divine omniscience not as passive surveillance, but as comprehensive awareness of reality’s informational structure. Rather than envisioning God as endlessly “watching”, this model proposes that God knows all because creation's informational fabric lies fully open to divine understanding, maintaining transcendence while offering conceptual accessibility.
Divine providence benefits from information-based explanations. Classical theology has been thinking about God’s sovereign guidance relates to human freedom. Information systems offer a metaphor where purposeful design accommodates genuine contingency—just as computational systems can be configured with overarching goals while allowing dynamic input and responsive processes.
The Incarnation may be viewed as the definitive transmission of divine meaning: Christ as God’s self-disclosure embodied in human form, functioning as the interface between eternity and temporality. Eschatological hope—particularly resurrection—can be envisioned as the fulfillment of creation's embedded purpose: the realization of its deepest structure according to divine intent.
5.2 Limitations of the DIS Framework
While the DIS analogy offers valuable insights, recognizing its limitations and establishing proper theological boundaries is essential for responsible scholarly discourse. Like all analogies, this framework illuminates certain aspects of reality while potentially obscuring others.
5.2.1 Methodological Limitations
Risk of Over-Technologizing and Reductionism
Applying computational concepts to theological realities may oversimplify divine activity. The relationship between God and creation far exceeds the most advanced information models. As theologian Kathryn Tanner warns, “Using technological metaphors for divine action risks reducing God to a cosmic engineer rather than preserving divine transcendence” (Tanner 2010). Describing divine-human relationships in information terms might imply transactional rather than personal interactions, while theological concepts such as grace, love, and redemption cannot be fully captured through informational language alone.
Theological Concerns About Divine Transcendence
Critics might legitimately worry that information-based language suggests God operates like an advanced computer system, potentially limiting divine freedom to algorithmic processes. Traditional Christian theology emphasizes that divine-human interaction involves personal relationship, love, grace, and moral engagement that transcend mere information exchange. Information processing models, however sophisticated, cannot adequately represent the relational, covenantal nature of divine action described in Scripture.
5.2.2 Theological Safeguards
Divine Transcendence and Classical Theology: The DIS framework must carefully preserve classical understandings of divine transcendence—God’s essential distinction from and independence of creation. While information-based analogies help conceptualize divine-creation interaction, they must not suggest that God is confined to or dependent upon informational processes. Unlike technological systems requiring hardware and operational parameters, divine action transcends all material limitations. The framework describes how creation reflects divine action, not how God’s internal nature operates, thus preserving divine simplicity, immutability, and aseity.
Distinction from Heterodox Approaches: The DIS framework must be clearly distinguished from process theology and panentheistic approaches that compromise divine transcendence. Unlike process theology, which suggests God develops through creation interaction, the DIS framework maintains that God’s perfect knowledge precedes and guides creation’s information architecture without divine development. Unlike panentheism, which locates creation within God's being, the DIS approach preserves the Creator-creation distinction—natural information systems reflect divine wisdom without constituting part of divine essence.
5.2.3 Clarification on “Design” and “Purpose” in the DIS Framework
To avoid misinterpretation, it is essential to clarify this framework’s use of terms like “design”, “purpose”, and “divine intent”. The DIS model presents purpose as woven into nature’s fabric, not requiring supernatural interruptions. God’s creative wisdom is expressed through the universe’s inherent order and capacity to process information.
“Design” is understood not as an external blueprint imposed upon passive matter, but as immanent purpose unfolding from within creation via natural laws and emergent complexity. The cosmos’s ability to generate and sustain life reflects God’s relational goals through scientifically describable processes.
This perspective differs fundamentally from “God of the gaps” arguments, sometimes associated with the Intelligent Design movement, which locate divine action in what science has yet to explain. The DIS model suggests divine action operates in and through natural mechanisms, with information as the medium for this interaction. The coherence and integrity of the whole created order—not its apparent gaps—serves as the primary testament to divine wisdom, emphasizing continuous creation and providence.
This chapter outlines promising research avenues and practical applications that emerge from the DIS framework. We identify opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration, specific research questions, technological applications, and methodological developments, demonstrating how this approach can guide both scholarly inquiry and real-world innovation.
6.1 Opportunities for Interdisciplinary Collaboration
The DIS framework enables collaborative research between information scientists, theologians, philosophers, and other experts across several promising areas:
Mathematical Modeling and Consciousness Studies: Computer scientists and theologians can collaborate to create mathematical simulations of goal-oriented systems emerging from fundamental physical laws, providing computational frameworks for understanding divine providence within natural mechanisms. Neuroscientists and theologians can explore consciousness through information theory, investigating whether prayer and meditation alter neural information processing, suggesting the brain’s openness to transcendent input.
Quantum-Theological Interface: Quantum information researchers and theologians could examine whether quantum phenomena provide physical analogs for theological concepts, exploring whether quantum entanglement reveals aspects of divine omnipresence or quantum information conservation aligns with divine knowledge.
Empirical Creation Care: Ecologists and biblical scholars could investigate whether environmental stewardship practices aligned with biblical principles yield results beyond mechanical predictions, offering empirical validation for theological claims that creation participates in a dynamic relationship with the Creator, responding to divine intention and care. As theologian Alister McGrath argues, natural theology finds new expression through information-theoretic approaches, suggesting that creation's informational complexity provides evidence for divine design while remaining open to scientific investigation (McGrath 2016).
6.2 Specific Research Questions
Several key research questions warrant dedicated study within the DIS framework:
Biological and Cosmological Purpose: Researchers can explore whether genetic stability and semantic emergence in natural systems follow patterns suggesting purposeful design rather than random processes. Related investigations could examine whether the fine-tuning of universal constants implies optimization for specific informational outcomes, particularly whether the universe's information-processing capacity exhibits design characteristics consistent with supporting conscious, relational existence.
Philosophical and Biblical Studies: How do semantic properties arise from syntactic structures in both technological and natural systems? Do emergent meaning patterns suggest intentional design? Additionally, do biblical communication and spiritual practices exhibit information-theoretic optimization for meaning recognition and comprehension across cultural contexts?
6.3 Technological Applications and Innovation
The DIS framework suggests technological development that integrates mechanistic principles with intentional design, creating systems that serve both functional and relational purposes:
AI Development with Wisdom Integration: Systems could incorporate theological insights about wisdom, prioritizing value-based information and ethical decision-making beyond mere optimization. This approach addresses growing concerns about AI alignment with human values by embedding purpose-awareness into algorithmic design.
Environmental Monitoring Systems: Advanced platforms could integrate biodiversity metrics with stewardship indicators, reflecting DIS principles of mechanism-meaning integration while supporting evidence-based creation care initiatives.
Educational Technology Platforms: Learning systems could integrate scientific data with theological interpretation, enabling students to explore both mechanism and purpose in natural phenomena, fostering scientific literacy alongside theological depth without forcing compartmentalization.
Community Engagement Applications: Digital platforms could facilitate collaboration between faith groups and scientific organizations on creation care, providing tools for integrating empirical knowledge with theological meaning in environmental responsibility initiatives.
6.4 Methodological Advancements
Advancing DIS research requires methodological innovations that respect both scientific rigor and theological depth:
Mixed-Method Research Frameworks: Combining quantitative analysis with qualitative meaning evaluation enables comprehensive study of complex systems where mechanism and purpose intersect. This methodology proves particularly valuable for investigating consciousness, environmental stewardship effectiveness, and divine action within natural processes.
Computational Biblical and Textual Analysis: Information-theoretic tools can analyze how biblical texts encode both historical information and theological meaning, revealing patterns in scriptural communication that optimize comprehension across diverse cultural contexts. This approach could extend to other religious and philosophical texts.
Predictive Modeling for Theology-Science Integration: DIS-based models can generate testable hypotheses about natural systems and theological concepts, creating empirical pathways for investigating traditionally philosophical questions about purpose and design in nature. Such models could help bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and observable phenomena.
Long-term Impact Assessment: Developing metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of DIS-informed approaches in education, environmental stewardship, and technology development, providing evidence for the practical value of integrating scientific and theological perspectives.
These methodological developments establish the DIS framework as a legitimate research paradigm for science-theology dialogue, offering concrete tools for advancing understanding at the intersection of empirical investigation and theological reflection. By providing both theoretical foundations and practical applications, the framework demonstrates how information science can serve as a bridge between traditionally separate domains of knowledge, fostering collaboration rather than competition between scientific and religious perspectives.
This study has explored how the Divine Information System (DIS) framework offers a meaningful connection between scientific observation and theological reflection. Drawing on concepts from information science, we’ve traced how natural systems exhibit purposeful structure—from physical laws to biological networks—and how these patterns can be interpreted as reflections of divine intentionality.
The foundation of the DIS framework lies in recognizing information as more than data—it is structured, functional, and meaningful. Across cosmic, ecological, and biological domains, these informational patterns point not only to operational efficiency but to deeper purposes discernible through the lens of Scripture. Biblical texts emphasize that creation exists for relationship, communication, and alignment with God’s will. Thus, the DIS framework highlights how the mechanisms of creation may serve not just physical outcomes but divine purposes.
Modern technologies such as artificial quantum theory and intelligence offer helpful analogies—tools that illustrate, but do not define, how divine action may be conceived within a scientifically informed worldview. These analogies enable theology to speak meaningfully in a technological age without reducing divine agency to mechanistic models.
Throughout this work, we’ve emphasized that analogies are helpful but limited. Section 5.2.2 outlined key cautions: the risk of over-technologizing divine action, drifting toward reductionism, or losing sight of divine transcendence. To remain theologically faithful, the DIS framework distinguishes itself from speculative or heterodox models. It affirms classical doctrines such as divine simplicity and transcendence while clarifying how “design” and “purpose” are understood in analogical, not literal, terms.
Taken together, the core contributions of this study include:
Showing that creation’s informational architecture reflects both functionality and purpose, aligning scientific insight with theological meaning.
Demonstrating how scientific and biblical worldviews can complement rather than compete, when interpreted through a shared conceptual lens.
Offering a contemporary vocabulary for theology, using analogies from information theory to convey enduring truths in an accessible way.
Perhaps most insightfully, this framework suggests that information is not merely physical but symbolic—a medium through which divine meaning is communicated. From the cosmic "Logos" in John 1 to the “Book of Life” in Revelation, Scripture portrays God as one who creates and communicates through meaningful patterns.
The hope of resurrection, central to Christian theology, underscores this vision. It reveals the future not as erasure but as transformation—the renewal of creation in accordance with its intended purpose: to participate in relationship with God. Information, in this view, is not merely preserved but fulfilled as creation moves toward divine communion.
This integrated perspective enriches both science and theology. Science gains tools to appreciate the semantic richness of natural systems, while theology finds renewed language for expressing core doctrines within today’s conceptual landscape. Rather than viewing the world in fragmented terms, the DIS model invites us to see the universe as an ordered, communicative system—one that points beyond itself to its Creator.
Looking ahead, interdisciplinary collaboration offers fertile ground for further development. As our understanding of complex systems deepens, new applications of the DIS model may emerge, fostering deeper insights into creation’s architecture and meaning.
In sum, this study affirms a central biblical truth: “The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork” (Psalm 19:1 NRSV). In an age increasingly shaped by information technologies, the metaphor of creation as a divine information system offers a compelling, accessible, and richly integrative model.
By connecting the “how” of science with the “why” of theology, the DIS framework invites ongoing dialogue—and renewed wonder at the wisdom embedded in creation’s design.
Alberts, Bruce, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, and Peter Walter. 2014. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 6th ed. Garland Science.
Clayton, Philip. 2004. Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coakley, Sarah. 2013. God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay "On the Trinity". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins, Richard. 1989. The Selfish Gene. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deane-Drummond, Celia. 2009. Christ and Evolution: Wonder and Wisdom. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Edwards, Denis. 2004. Breath of Life: A Theology of the Creator Spirit. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
Gregersen, Niels Henrik. 2010. "The Cross of Christ in an Evolutionary World." Dialog: A Journal of Theology 49 (3): 192–207.
Grüter, Christoph, and Francis L. W. Ratnieks. 2011. "Honeybee Foragers Increase the Use of Waggle Dance Information When Private Information Becomes Unrewarding." Animal Behaviour 81 (5): 949–954.
Harrison, Peter. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haught, John F. 2000. God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Herzfeld, Noreen. 2002. In Our Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Spirit. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Janeway, Charles A., Paul Travers, Mark Walport, and Mark J. Shlomchik. 2001. Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease. 5th ed. Garland Science.
McGrath, Alister E. 2016. Re-Imagining Nature: The Promise of a Christian Natural Theology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Meyer, Stephen C. 2009. Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design. HarperOne.
Noble, Denis. 2016. Dance to the Tune of Life: Biological Relativity. Cambridge University Press.
Peacocke, Arthur Robert. 1993. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming—Natural, Divine, and Human. 2nd ed. London: SCM Press.
Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polkinghorne, John. 2002. Quantum Theory and Theology. London: SPCK.
Polkinghorne, John. 2019. Quantum Physics and Theology: An Unexpected Kinship. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Schlesinger, William H., and Emily S. Bernhardt. 2013. Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change. 3rd ed. Academic Press.
Shannon, Claude E. 1948. "A Mathematical Theory of Communication." The Bell System Technical Journal 27 (3): 379–423.
Simard, Suzanne W. 2021. Finding the Mother Tree: Discovering the Wisdom of the Forest. New York: Knopf.
Tanner, Kathryn. 2010. Christ the Key. Cambridge University Press.
Tononi, Giulio. 2008. "Consciousness as Integrated Information: A Provisional Manifesto." The Biological Bulletin 215 (3): 216–242.
Tracy, David. 1996. The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism. New York: Crossroad Publishing.
Watson, James D., and Francis H. C. Crick. 1953. "Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid." Nature 171 (4356): 737–738.
Wheeler, John Archibald. 1990. "Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links." In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, edited by Wojciech H. Zurek, 3–28. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.