I am a PhD student in Economics at the University of Amsterdam and the Tinbergen Institute under the supervision of Marcelo Pedroni and Roel Beetsma.
My main research interests are macroeconomics, financial economics, and housing markets. I have gained extensive experience in working with heterogeneous agent models and micro data.
Currently, I work at the European Central Bank as a PhD trainee in the DG Macroprudential Policy and Financial Stability. (The views expressed on this website are mine and do not necessarily reflect the positions of ECB or the Eurosystem.)
You can find my CV here.
Email: d.j.schmidt2@uva.nl
Office: E3.25, Roeterseiland Campus
This paper studies the effect of flexible retirement on the marginal propensity to consume out of a windfall gain. Using data from the Survey of Consumer Expectations, I find that the MPC of workers is about 20% lower than the MPC of retirees, even when controlling for age and other individual characteristics. In a simple theoretical model, I demonstrate that endogenous retirement can explain this difference in MPCs: Older workers use a part of the windfall to finance early retirement which decreases their consumption response compared to retirees. To quantify this mechanism, I build a life-cycle model with a realistic social security system and durable goods. I find that flexible retirement can account for most of the MPC difference in the data. My results have important implications for the response of aggregate consumption to stock market booms and for the use of MPCs as sufficient statistics in public finance.
Presented at the University of Amsterdam (2023), Tinbergen Institute (2023), KVS New Paper Sessions (2023, The Hague), Netspar International Pension Workshop (2023, Leiden), Munich Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (2024), RGS Doctoral Conference (2024, Essen), Theories and Methods in Macro (2024, Amsterdam), Meeting of the Society of Economics of the Household (2024, Singapore), Baltic Economic Conference (2024, Tallinn).
This paper analyzes the effects of property transfer taxes on homeownership, residential mobility, and welfare. Using an overlapping generations model calibrated to the Netherlands, I find that an abolition of the 2% transfer tax increases the likelihood that homeowners sell their old house and buy a new one by about 40%. It also leads to a rise of the homeownership rate by 1-5 percentage points (depending on how revenue neutrality is achieved). Newborns prefer to live in an economy without property transfer taxes if the forgone tax revenues are replaced with higher annual property taxes, but not if revenue neutrality is achieved with higher income taxes. I also consider a partial reform that only exempts young first-time homebuyers from the transfer tax and is financed with higher annual property taxes. The resulting welfare gains are more than one half of the welfare gains from the complete reform.
Presented at the University of Amsterdam (2021), European Meeting of the Urban Economics Association (2022, London), Echoppe Conference on the Economics of Housing and Housing Policies (2022, Toulouse), Verein für Socialpolitik Jahrestagung (2022, Basel), Nederlandse Economendag (2022, The Hague), University of Konstanz (2024).
The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in the US has accumulated $25 billion of debt because its insurance rates do not accurately reflect actual flood risk. Despite this implicit subsidy, many homeowners in flood-prone areas are not covered by the NFIP. I construct a heterogeneous agent model to analyze the consequences of potential reforms of the National Flood Insurance Program (e.g., mandatory insurance or actuarially fair insurance rates) on the US housing market.
(jointly with colleagues from ECB, ESMA, ESRB Secretariat, Bundesbank, Banque de France, and AMF)
Recent stress episodes such as the 2021 failure of Archegos and the 2022 UK gilt markets crisis have shown how leverage in the non-bank financial intermediation sector can be a source of systemic risk and amplify stress in the wider financial system. We combine fund-level data with transaction-level information on derivatives and repurchase agreements to explore risks from leverage in alternative investment funds in the EU and to assess policy options to mitigate these risks.
Presented at ESRB Expert Group on Non-Bank Financial-Intermediation (2024, Frankfurt).