Dan's Tech Blog

view blog post archive 06.2024 - 10.2024

👆

Sunday, June 30, 2024

The Increasing Impact of Global Warming on Smartphone Charging-Performance

As global temperatures rise due to climate change, smartphone users are increasingly experiencing slower charging speeds and reduced device performance. This phenomenon occurs because most smartphones are designed to throttle charging and processing power when internal temperatures exceed certain thresholds, typically around 32°C (90°F), to prevent damage to the battery and other components. With global warming pushing ambient temperatures higher, especially in tropical and subtropical regions, smartphones are more frequently hitting their thermal limits, leading to extended periods of reduced charging efficiency. This growing challenge underscores the need for improved heat management and cooling systems in future smartphone designs, as users adapt their charging behaviors to cope with these changes.

The situation highlights an unexpected intersection between climate change and everyday technology use, potentially influencing future smartphone designs to emphasize improved heat management and cooling systems.

• Rising global temperatures due to climate change exacerbate smartphone charging and performance issues

• Ambient temperatures frequently approach or exceed 32°C (90°F), especially in tropical and subtropical regions

• Phones are more likely to reach their thermal thresholds even when not in active use

• Extended periods of slower charging and potential performance throttling occur, particularly during summer months or heatwaves

• This situation highlights an unexpected intersection between climate change and everyday technology use

• Future smartphone designs may emphasize improved heat management and cooling systems

Temperature-Based Charging Throttling

Charging speed regulation based on temperature is a crucial safety feature in modern smartphones. Internal sensors detect temperature rises and automatically reduce or halt charging when the device gets too warm, protecting against potential battery damage, swelling, or fire hazards. This mechanism balances fast charging capabilities with device longevity. Several factors can contribute to higher temperatures during charging, including:

• Ambient temperature

• Device usage while charging

• Presence of a phone case

• Heat generated by fast charging technologies

To maintain faster charging speeds, users may employ methods such as removing phone cases, avoiding device use during charging, or even actively cooling the phone. However, extreme measures like using air conditioning directly on the device are generally not necessary or recommended for everyday use. 

Specific Temperature Thresholds

While exact temperature thresholds vary between devices, general ranges for charging speed reduction have been observed:

• Above 74°F (23°C), charge current may already drop under 1570mA, depending on the phone

• At approximately 86°F (30°C), charge current may drop to around 600mA

• Charging speeds typically begin to decrease around 90°F (32°C) battery temperature

• Significant throttling occurs above 113°F (45°C)

• Some devices may have a cutoff point around 90°F (32°C) for dropping to minimal charging rates, such as 280mA

• These thresholds are designed to optimize charging efficiency while protecting the battery from heat-related damage

Adaptive Charging Behaviors

To cope with temperature-related charging issues, users in affected areas are adopting new habits.

• Charge devices in cooler locations or during cooler parts of the day to maintain faster charging speeds

• Resort to active cooling methods, though this approach increases overall energy consumption

• Adaptive behaviors may become more widespread as global temperatures continue to rise, potentially influencing future smartphone designs

• Manufacturers might need to focus on developing more efficient heat management and cooling systems to address the growing challenge of temperature-induced charging slowdowns in various climates worldwide

source: summary of free Perplexity GPT-3.5 query using the new "Page"-feature @ https://www.perplexity.ai/page/smartphones-and-temperature-ba-xEkc7Nd9RA2tXXMoC4VT3g

Thursday, June 20, 2024

New page "useful freeware" 

You can now find my recommended freeware in the top right corner (top left in mobile view). I also added two programs.

Friday, April 26, 2024

[updated 28.04.24]

Huawei's Delicate Dance with the Chinese Government

The Chinese government and Communist Party could likely force the chinese tech company Huawei (and others like Oppo, Vivo, OnePlus, Realme, ZTE and Lenovo) to hand over customer data if they requested it, despite Huawei's denials (regarding Huawei). Experts argue that under China's national security laws, including the 2017 National Intelligence Law and 2014 Counter-Espionage Law, companies like Huawei would have little choice but to comply with any demand for data from the government.

The Chinese government has considerable influence over private companies like Huawei through heavy regulation, state-backed investment, and the requirement to have Communist Party branches within the company. Huawei's founder Ren Zhengfei is a former People's Liberation Army engineer and current Party member.

While Huawei has distanced itself from the Party and asserts it would never spy, the company's precise ownership structure is unknown. The Chinese government has also backed Huawei in its disputes with the U.S., suggesting the company is closely aligned with Beijing's interests.

Ultimately, Huawei's ability to resist government data requests remains untested in court. The company's close ties to the Party and China's vague national security laws make it unlikely Huawei could defy a serious demand for customer information from the Chinese state. 

Unlikely Transparency: The Challenges of Verifying Data Access by China's Government on Huawei's Servers

It is highly unlikely that the public or even Huawei itself would find out if the Chinese government accessed data stored on Huawei's servers:

1. China's national security laws give the government broad powers to compel companies like Huawei to cooperate with intelligence gathering without disclosing it. Huawei would have little legal recourse to resist such demands.

2. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has significant influence over private companies through regulation, state investment, and requiring CCP branches within the firms.

3. Experts argue it would be nearly impossible for Huawei to openly defy a serious request for data from the Chinese government or CCP. The company's close ties to the state make it unlikely it would risk the consequences of defiance.

4. The U.S. has accused Huawei of having backdoor access to the networks it builds globally, allowing it to covertly access sensitive data. While Huawei denies this, the company's ownership structure is opaque and its ability to resist the CCP remains untested.

In summary, given China's vague security laws, the CCP's control over private firms, and Huawei's close alignment with the state, it is highly improbable the company or the public would ever find out if the Chinese government accessed data on Huawei's servers, even if it did so covertly.

further reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Huawei#Espionage_and_security_concerns

source: summarized free Perplexity GPT-3.5 output @ https://www.perplexity.ai/search/huawei-and-privacy-1GvrPM.xRleDM4NicyKRJA

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Facebook allegedly experiments with draining its' users phone batteries

A former Facebook data scientist named George Hayward has claimed that Facebook has the ability to secretly drain users' smartphone batteries as part of its internal app testing. Hayward alleges that Facebook engages in a practice called "negative testing", which involves deliberately depleting a user's battery to test how certain app features or issues perform when the battery is low.

He claims he was given an internal Facebook document titled "How to run thoughtful negative tests" that included examples of such battery-draining experiments.

Hayward says he raised concerns about this practice, telling his manager that it "could harm somebody", but was told that "by harming a few we can help the greater masses". He was later fired for refusing to participate in the negative testing.

While the full extent of this alleged practice is unclear, the search results indicate that Facebook has long been accused of causing abnormal battery drain on users' devices. Hayward's claims suggest this may have been an intentional effort by the company, though Facebook has not responded to the allegations. 

Recommendation

Entirely disable automatic app updates in the Google Play Store for example to reduce risk of automatically becoming a participant of any new Facebook experiment for example, but of course don't forget to update apps if they don't function properly anymore at any point in time.

source: summarized free Perplexity GPT-3.5 output @ https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Facebook-users-drain-J88ELze3TFGHm.PiyfvcNw

Monday, April 15, 2024

The Risks of Opera GX: Uncovering the Chinese Connection

A closer examination of Opera GX, the popular internet browser used by over 25 million gamers worldwide, reveals concerning ties to its parent company, Kunlun Tech, which is based in China. This raises significant privacy and security concerns for users. The company made false claims about its location and there are potential risks associated with its parent company.

Changing Policies and Data Sharing Privacy Concerns

The fact that Kunlun Tech is located in China is particularly troubling. The Chinese government has a history of exerting control over the flow of information and engaging in surveillance activities. This raises the possibility that the personal data of Opera's users, including sensitive information, could be accessed and potentially compromised by the Chinese government. One of the most significant changes observed is the update to Opera's privacy policy. The new terms state that by using any Opera service, including Opera GX, users consent to the company's "unrestricted use" of their data. This is particularly worrying given that Kunlun Tech is required to share user data with the Chinese Communist Party upon request.

Predatory Lending Apps

It is also revealed that Opera GX has been connected to several predatory lending apps on the Google Play Store. These apps were known for charging exorbitant interest rates, up to 876%, and even threatening users with legal action or credit blacklisting if payments were late. This shady practice further undermines the company's credibility and raises concerns about its ethical standards.

Opera GX's Concerning Data Practices

To further investigate the risks associated with Opera GX, an experiment was conducted to track the requests made by the browser. The results revealed that Opera GX was making unsolicited requests to a website that provided detailed geolocation data, including the user's exact city, zip code, and coordinates. This level of tracking is highly concerning and undermines the browser's claims of privacy and security.

Conclusion

In light of these revelations, it's clear that Opera GX and Kunlun Tech have a concerning history of questionable practices. From the potential risks associated with data sharing in China to the company's involvement in predatory lending, it's becoming increasingly difficult to trust the browser and its claims of user privacy and security. As users, we must be vigilant and carefully consider the implications of using Opera GX or any other products associated with Kunlun Tech.

Recommendation

Firefox offers a great level of customization and privacy settings while the Brave Browser offers similar features to Opera GX but with a stronger focus on protecting user data of course.

source: Qubick - "The Disturbing Truth Behind Opera GX": https://youtu.be/NV8akIgfDqQ

    summarized free Perplexity GPT-3.5 output @ https://www.perplexity.ai/search/please-summarize-this-LdYZjPQvSQG2RlB5l6NBFg

Friday, April 12, 2024

A whopping 7 Samsung devices, released between 2010 and 2012, had confirmed backdoors

A backdoor in Samsung Galaxy devices was discovered by the developers of the Replicant Android OS in 2014.

They discovered that the proprietary software running on the modem/baseband processor of certain Samsung devices contained a backdoor that allowed remote access and control of the device. This software allowed the modem to remotely read, write, and delete files on the device's storage, potentially giving an attacker access to the user's personal data and the ability to control the device. 

They discovered the backdoor in Samsung Galaxy devices through the following process:

1. While reverse engineering Samsung's proprietary Radio Interface Layer (RIL) software, which handles communications with the modem/baseband processor, they found that it implemented a set of "RFS commands" that allowed the modem to perform remote file I/O operations on the device's storage.

2. They analyzed this proprietary Samsung software and discovered that it enabled the modem to read, write, and delete files on the phone's storage, potentially giving the modem access to the user's personal data.

3. They determined that this functionality constituted a backdoor, as the RFS commands did not appear to have any legitimate use case, and the modem could potentially be remotely controlled to exploit this backdoor.

Samsung has disputed these claims, stating that the "software feature" in question poses no security risk to users and is based on a misunderstanding. However, the researchers maintain that the backdoor functionality exists, even if it may have been added for legitimate purposes.

Affected devices:

• Nexus S

• Galaxy S

• Galaxy S2

• Galaxy Note

• Galaxy Nexus

• Galaxy Tab 2 (7-inch and 10.1-inch models)

• Galaxy Note 2

source: summarized free Perplexity GPT-3.5 output @ https://www.perplexity.ai/search/which-samsung-devices-kO5JtFT7TkWwJdV8clUhQA

Sunday, March 24, 2024

Unveiling Google Chrome's Controversial Silent Scans: A Privacy Conundrum

Google Chrome has been known to scan computers for malware without explicit user consent. This scanning process, known as Chrome Cleanup, has raised concerns about user privacy and transparency. Despite the intentions to enhance security, the lack of clear disclosure has sparked debates about the extent of data collection and user awareness.

Chrome Cleanup operates as a local signature engine that scans for potential threats within files and processes on users' systems. While Google emphasizes that this scanning is narrower and less invasive than traditional antivirus software, questions remain about the scope of the scans and the data collected. Users have reported receiving notifications that suggest virus infections or prompt them to run scans, often leading to confusion and suspicion.

One of the key issues highlighted by security experts is the lack of explicit information provided to users regarding Chrome's scanning activities. Users may not be aware that Chrome is conducting these scans, leading to concerns about privacy and control over their devices. The inability to opt-out of this scanning process has also been a point of contention among users seeking more transparency and control over their browsing experience.

In conclusion, while Google's efforts to bolster security through Chrome Cleanup are commendable, there is a clear need for improved communication with users. Transparency, user consent, and clear information about data collection practices are essential in maintaining trust and ensuring user privacy in the digital age.

source: free Perplexity GPT-3.5 output @ https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Did-google-chrome-0VedASmhQKuG1cAJ_a_CRA#0

Shoutout to mibbits user "freaktechnik" for his support making this theme

and to W3schools.com !

Sunday, September 3, 2023

How exploited click workers are spied on

Outsourcing-company CloudFactory Ltd. spies on their workers via their own webcams, part of their 2020 blogpost reveals:

With this new incredible level of surveillance, George Orwell's 1984 gets even closer to reality, with the lives of all affected workers (especially from low-wage countries like Kenya, Pakistan and Venezuela) reaching a striking similarity to his described "telescreens".

source: https://blog.cloudfactory.com/data-security-in-the-age-of-remote-workforces