I was planning to do a 100% completion run, including a full Hyrule Compendium. About halfway through the game, I realized I never took a picture of my first dungeon boss. I didn't worry too much at first, since you can buy additional pictures in Hateno, but now that I bought every single monster picture available, that boss is still missing (as well as a few others, which I assume to be the final boss and some special enemies I haven't seen yet).
Is there any way to still get a picture of dungeon bosses and complete the compendium? Obviously I don't have any save files from before I fought that boss, and even if I did, I'd have to pretty much re-do the entire game.
D Boss Photos Download
Download File 🔥 https://urluso.com/2yGccX 🔥
You will have the opportunity to purchase the missing boss pictures from Symin at the Ancient Hateno Tech Lab. They will cost 500 rupees each and will only be available after you beat the game. Just look for the Elite Enemy Picture set when buying pictures.
If you have the DLC and haven't beat the illusory realm blight Gannons yet in order to upgrade your hero powers you can take a picture of them for your compendium. That will give you a second chance to photograph those "Elite" enemies if you don't want to buy the pictures.
Today at work, I stumbled upon a collection of private photos taken by my two bosses (they are a married couple, and own the business). The photos in question are of a lewd nature of one of them. They are stored on a server where anybody in the company can access these files.
I have run into exactly this issue where I came across some personal files that a coworker had accidentally (I assume) copied to a public folder. I sent my coworker an email and let them know the files were there and that anyone could access them. They were very appreciative and took care of it immediately.
The important thing is to be as discreet as possible. It would be best if you could avoid them thinking you know the content of the pictures at all. Hopefully, you stopped viewing them when you realized what the content of one of them was. Depending on the contents of the folder, you may be able to get away with an innocuous email about image files being stored in a public folder. I'm assuming you can tell which of the owners created the files by looking at the properties.
Case 1: The owners think the files may be private (e.g. they're in a folder \\computer\\share\\BossName), but they don't realize the folder is public. In this case, you could simply email them saying they have a public folder shared and ask them if they would like to make it private, then you could simply alter the permissions and not hint that you've looked at any of the files.
Case 2: The images are in a folder where there probably shouldn't be images, e.g. they're in \\computer\\share\\Spreadsheets. You could email the person that created the files, saying there are a bunch of image files in this directory and ask if the images belong in a Spreadsheets folder, or if they should be moved somewhere else.
Case 3: It is REALLY messy, all kinds of files are in the folder and they don't clearly belong to one of the Bosses. In this case you could email them saying the public folder is full of a mishmash of file types and tell them you'd like to separate them by type like images, spreadsheets, text files and ask them to take a look since they created some of those files.
Yes, I opened one not knowing what the content might be and wanted to save you any embarrassment by letting you handle it. These are public files at the moment and any user in the network could stumble across them so we should move them or protect them so people don't have access.
I do wonder about the circumstances of your discovery. Is this particular aspect of your job intended to make sure that storage space isn't exhausted or is it to make sure that people aren't engaging in appropriate activities on the company dime?
If the former then it doesn't seem like you'd need to open up any of the files. You could just report to a higher up, saying "there's 500GB of data in this directory - can we delete it or back it up and delete it?" or some such.
If the latter then... are these files accessible by everyone or just by you and the owners? If the former then I'd tell the owners asap. Like who knows, maybe other people have already come across the files and just not told them. If the latter then I'd probably just forget what I saw and consider anything accessible only by the three of y'all as being exempt from your searches henceforth.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Researchers have only recently started to take advantage of the developments in technology and communication for sharing data and documents. However, the exchange of experimental material has not taken advantage of this progress yet. In order to facilitate access to experimental material, the Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS) project was created as a free standardized set of visual stimuli accessible to all researchers, through a normative database. The BOSS is currently the largest existing photo bank providing norms for more than 15 dimensions (e.g. familiarity, visual complexity, manipulability, etc.), making the BOSS an extremely useful research tool and a mean to homogenize scientific data worldwide. The first phase of the BOSS was completed in 2010, and contained 538 normative photos. The second phase of the BOSS project presented in this article, builds on the previous phase by adding 930 new normative photo stimuli. New categories of concepts were introduced, including animals, building infrastructures, body parts, and vehicles and the number of photos in other categories was increased. All new photos of the BOSS were normalized relative to their name, familiarity, visual complexity, object agreement, viewpoint agreement, and manipulability. The availability of these norms is a precious asset that should be considered for characterizing the stimuli as a function of the requirements of research and for controlling for potential confounding effects.
There are currently stimuli with published norms available to study several psychological aspects of language and visual cognitions. Norms represent valuable information that can be used as experimental variables or systematically controlled to limit their potential influence on another experimental manipulation. The present work proposes 480 photo stimuli that have been normalized for name, category, familiarity, visual complexity, object agreement, viewpoint agreement, and manipulability. Stimuli are also available in grayscale, blurred, scrambled, and line-drawn version. This set of objects, the Bank Of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), was created specifically to meet the needs of scientists in cognition, vision and psycholinguistics who work with photo stimuli.
Copyright: 2010 Brodeur et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was supported by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant #238617). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Experimental stimuli such as visual objects and sounds are essential tools for exploring central processes such as memory, attention, language, etc. They can vary in their perceptual saliency, shape, familiarity, and meaningfulness. Several sets of stimuli have been built and normalized to allow better control over the stimulus features that influence task performance. For instance, there are several databases of words available, such as the Oxford Psycholinguistics database [1]. The words' frequency of use and number of letters have been measured and several variables have been normalized such as the familiarity, meaningfulness, imageability, and concreteness (e.g., [2]). Because they have access to such normative databases, scientists in psycholinguistics can now systematically balance these words' variables across experimental conditions. This control is essential since these variables can modulate behavioral performances and physiological activities in various cognitive tasks [3], [4]. Today, it is inconceivable to conduct a psycholinguistics experiment with sets of stimuli that are not normative.
In 1980, Snodgrass and Vanderwart [5] proposed 260 black-and-white line-drawn pictures depicting mostly objects but also animals, vehicles, body parts, and symbolic representations. These pictures were normalized by asking subjects to name the pictures and to rate the familiarity, the visual complexity, and the degree to which the picture matched the image they mentally generated after reading its name. These pictures were rapidly disseminated across the scientific community and became some of the most widely used visual stimuli in cognitive science. This work was pursued in several ways. First, the number of pictures, 260, was increased to 400 by the addition of stimuli from Cycowicz, Friedman, Rothstein and Snodgrass [6] and from the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) of Dunn and Dunn [7], [8]. This set was also complemented with 299 pictures by Bonin, Peereman, Malardier, Meot, and Chalard [9], 137 pictures by Alvarez and Cuetos [10] and 99 pictures by Nishimoto, Miyawaki, Ueda, Une, and Takahashi [11]. Other normative sets of pictures of objects, proposed by Dell'Acqua, Lotto and Job [12], Kremin and colleagues [13], and Masterson and Druks [14] are also available as well as sets of pictures depicting actions [14], [15]. To these, one can also add older sets of pictures (e.g., a set from the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and the Abbate and LaChapelle [16]) that have recently been normalized [17], [18], [19]. Finally, there are sets made from modified versions of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart's pictures. These modified pictures include grayscale and colored versions [20], chimeric objects [21], [22], rotated objects [23], [24], silhouettes [25], [26], straight-line versions of objects, fragmented pictures [27], and degraded pictures [25]. Most of these modifications reduce stimulus information and can thus be used for tasks testing very specific visual processing aspects involved in identification processes. For instance, De Winter and Wagemans [28] used silhouettes, degraded, fragmented, and straight-line versions of pictures to examine aspects of contour-based object identification and segmentation. 152ee80cbc
bpsc teacher qualifying marks 2023 pdf download
jyp sixteen full episodes download