Cui, Weiguang; Power, Chris; Biffi, Veronica; Borgani, Stefano; Murante, Giuseppe; Fabjan, Dunja; Knebe, Alexander; Lewis, Geraint F.; Poole, Gregory B., 2016, MNRAS, 456, 2566C
Using a statistical sample of clusters drawn from a suite of cosmological simulations (see more detail in Cui et al 2012 & 2014) in which we have explored a range of galaxy formation models, we investigate how the location of this centre is affected by the choice of observable - stars, hot gas, or the full mass distribution as can be probed by the gravitational potential. We explore several measures of cluster centre: the minimum of the gravitational potential, which would expect to define the centre if the cluster is in dynamical equilibrium; the peak of the density; the centre of brightest cluster galaxy (BCG); and the peak and centroid of X-ray luminosity. We find that the centre of BCG correlates more strongly with the minimum of the gravitational potential than the X-ray defined centres, while active galactic nuclei feedback acts to significantly enhance the offset between the peak X-ray luminosity and minimum gravitational potential. These results highlight the importance of centre identification when interpreting clusters observations, in particular when comparing theoretical predictions and observational data.
Left figures show histograms of the offsets between the selected BCG center from optical images and the minimum potential center. Most of the offsets are within the simulation softening length (the vertical dashed line).
Similar to upper figure, but for the offsets between the X-ray peak (red histogram), X-ray centroid (bule histogram) and the minimum potential center.