How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
If you want the widest model compatibility and a neutral black finish for audiophiles chasing a cleaner signal path, choose CONVELIFE PX100; if you need a snug memory-foam over-ear cushion in a bold red accent that snaps on in seconds, choose Zopsc Replacement Ear Pads. Both are replacement pads, but they solve different problems — and for audiophiles, that difference matters more than most people think.
• CONVELIFE PX100 — biggest strength: An unusually broad compatibility list covering Sennheiser PX200/PX100 series, PXC300/PXC150/PXC250, PMX100/PMX200, HX50, PX80/PX60, PC130/PC131, plus Audio Technica ATH-ES3/ES5/FW3/FW33/VM55/PC35 and KOSS Porta Pro, KSC35, KSC75 and KSC55.
• CONVELIFE PX100 — biggest trade-off: It's a black, wrinkle-PU pad with no colour options and no stated universal over-ear fit, so it only makes sense if your headphone is on that compatibility list.
• Zopsc Replacement Ear Pads — biggest strength: Plush memory foam with a snug, pressure-distributing fit that the brand explicitly positions for extended wear — long listening sessions and sleeping through long flights.
• Zopsc Replacement Ear Pads — biggest trade-off: The listed model references (700BT, 710BT, 720BT, 750BTNC, 760NC, 770NC) are narrower in scope and lean toward one family of over-ear headphones, and the pad is red — a look, not a neutral one.
• Who each is for: CONVELIFE PX100 is for owners of the specific compact Sennheiser/Audio Technica/KOSS models listed who want an exact-fit black replacement. Zopsc is for over-ear headphone owners who prize softness, a snug seal and a splash of colour.
The CONVELIFE PX100 is a repair part first and a comfort upgrade second. Its whole pitch rests on fit: the compatibility list names Sennheiser PX200, PX100, PX200-II, PX100-II, PXC300, PMX100, PMX200, HX50, PXC150, PXC250, PX80, PX60, PMX60, PC130 and PC131, plus Audio Technica ATH-ES3, ES5, FW3, FW33, VM55 and PC35, plus KOSS Porta Pro, PP, KSC35, KSC75 and KSC55. If your headphone is on that list, you're the target buyer. If it isn't, this pad isn't for you — and you should not try to force it.
Material-wise, it's protein wrinkle PU over high-elastic memory foam. CONVELIFE describes the foam as blocking outside noise and enhancing the music coming through, and the PU as soft, durable and flexible. The wrinkle texture is a small but real detail: it gives the pad a slightly grained surface rather than a glossy slab, which tends to feel less slippery against the ear over a long session. The pad is also designed to cushion vibrations between your ear and the driver housing — that's the mechanism the brand credits for what it calls more vibrant sound. I'd treat that as a design intent rather than a promise, but it's the right way to think about what a pad actually does to a headphone.
Who should buy it? Someone whose pads have gone flat, cracked or shiny with age, who owns one of the listed models, and who wants the headphone to look factory-fresh again in black. It ships as one pair, and the brand backs it with a 12-month return-or-replace service and a one-year warranty description — genuinely useful when you're buying a part you can't inspect before it arrives.
Who should skip it? Anyone with an over-ear headphone outside that list. Also anyone who wants a colour accent — black is the only finish here.
The Zopsc pads attack the same problem from the comfort angle. The build is protein leather over plush memory foam, and the brand's emphasis is on how that foam behaves: it conforms to the shape of your ear, distributes pressure evenly, and blocks ambient noise through a snug seal. That's the classic argument for a well-made over-ear cushion, and it's the reason people replace pads in the first place — not because the old ones look bad, but because they've stopped sealing and started pressing.
Zopsc also leans hard into extended wear. The description calls out long listening sessions, and specifically mentions sleeping through long flights — which is the honest framing for this kind of pad. If you wear headphones for hours at a stretch, pressure distribution is the spec that matters most, and that's what memory foam is for.
Installation is a genuine differentiator. Zopsc says no tools and no adhesives: you stretch the soft material over the ear cups and snap it into place, with a pre-stitched design holding it secure during active use. That's a real convenience if you've ever wrestled with a pad that needed to be tucked under a plastic lip.
The constraints are worth stating plainly. The listed applications — 700BT, 710BT, 720BT, 750BTNC, 760NC, 770NC — point to a specific over-ear family, even though the pad is described as a universal fit for most over-ear headphones. And it's red. The brand calls the colour fade-resistant and frames it as a custom look, which is fair, but if you wanted your headphones to disappear into a black bag, this isn't that. Warranty coverage is stated as 90 days.
• Best for exact-fit replacement on a listed Sennheiser, Audio Technica or KOSS model → CONVELIFE PX100.
• Best for maximum softness and even pressure over multi-hour sessions → Zopsc Replacement Ear Pads.
• Best for a snug seal that quiets the outside world → Zopsc, on the strength of its conforming memory foam and snug-fit design.
• Best for a neutral black finish that matches the original headphone → CONVELIFE PX100.
• Best for a bold colour accent → Zopsc — red is the entire visual story.
• Best for owners of over-ear models outside the CONVELIFE list → Zopsc, whose broader over-ear framing gives it more room to fit.
• Best for tool-free, snap-on installation → Zopsc.
• Best warranty coverage as described → CONVELIFE, at 12 months versus Zopsc's 90 days.
For audiophiles, I'd buy the CONVELIFE PX100 — but only if your headphone appears on that compatibility list. The reasoning is simple: a replacement pad only helps if it fits the housing it was made for, and CONVELIFE's list is specific, long and covers several of the small on-ear and compact over-ear models people actually still use. Add the vibration-cushioning design intent and the longer warranty description, and it's the safer part to buy. If your headphones aren't on the list, or you specifically want the softest possible over-ear cushion for long sessions and sleep, I'd take the Zopsc pads instead. Either way, check the current price on Amazon before you commit — and confirm your model first, because that single check decides this for you.
Logitech H111 vs Nabevi HeadphonesFAQ
No — treat the lists as separate. CONVELIFE names Sennheiser PX-series, Audio Technica ATH models and KOSS Porta Pro/KSC models. Zopsc lists 700BT through 770NC. Match your model to the sheet before ordering.
In my opinion, the Zopsc pads have the edge. Zopsc designs around plush memory foam, a snug fit and even pressure distribution, and explicitly frames the pad for extended wear and long flights. CONVELIFE's foam is described as high-elastic and noise-blocking, which is a different emphasis.
A pad changes the seal and the distance between the driver and your ear, so it can affect bass and isolation. CONVELIFE describes cushioning vibrations for more vibrant sound; Zopsc describes ambient noise blocking through a snug fit. Neither claim is a guarantee, but both describe real physical effects.
Zopsc states a tool-free, adhesive-free snap-on install that takes seconds. CONVELIFE describes installation as easy but doesn't detail the method. For most pads of this type, seating the material over the cup rim is the whole job.
• TOPIEI Sleep Headphones vs Veeniitosr Sleep Headphones
• Logitech H111 vs Nabevi Headphones
• Riwbox WT-7S vs New Bee 2: Wireless Travel Headphones
• Krysenix Xbox vs DOOGEEEco Bone Conduction Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.