EPOS is my pick for a controller and headset holder search focused on motorcycle use: its adaptive ANC, Bluetooth and on-ear design make it the most flexible wireless option here.
Plantronics is the runner-up for its lightweight, hands-free DECT headset and one-touch call controls.
• EPOS Impact 1061T — best for wireless listening and calls in changing noise; pick this if adaptive ANC, Bluetooth and multipoint connectivity matter.
• Plantronics PLNCS540 — best for hands-free calls around a work area; pick this if you want a lightweight DECT headset with a stated range of up to 350 feet.
• Lenovo 115 — best for wired computer calls and meetings; pick this if USB-A/USB-C connectivity and over-ear memory foam earcups suit your setup.
• Jabra Evolve2 — best for a simple, lightweight wired meeting headset; pick this if you want a single-ear design and a USB-A/USB-C connection.
The EPOS Impact 1061T is a wireless, on-ear headset aimed at work calls and music. It pairs over Bluetooth and includes adaptive active noise cancelling, a microphone with EPOS voice-optimization technology, and multipoint connectivity. Of these four, it is the clearest fit for someone who wants one headset to move between different listening situations rather than a wired computer-only model.
Adaptive ANC adjusts to surrounding noise, while the microphone processing is designed to reduce background sound and make speech clearer to the person on the other end. That distinction matters: noise cancelling helps the wearer concentrate, while microphone processing targets outgoing voice. Its super-wideband audio is specified for calls and music, and touch controls provide volume adjustment without a separate wired control box.
The design is on-ear, with an adaptive comfort approach intended for prolonged wear. Its listed weight is 181 grams, and it comes with a charging station. Bluetooth makes it convenient for compatible devices, but the sheet does not establish motorcycle-specific functions such as helmet compatibility, wind-noise handling or riding communications. I would not treat it as a motorcycle intercom or assume it is safe to wear while riding. For stationary use around a motorcycle—such as calls, music at home or planning a route—it offers a more versatile wireless setup than the wired picks.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
The trade-off is that it is built around professional office use, not motorcycle mounting or helmet audio. It also has no headphone jack, so a wired listening option is not listed. In my opinion, it is the strongest overall choice here for a shopper who wants wireless flexibility and active noise control, provided the intended use is stationary rather than riding.
The Plantronics PLNCS540 is a monaural wireless headset system for calls. It uses DECT rather than relying on a listed Bluetooth connection, and the package includes a base, headband, eartips and earloops. That range of wearing options gives it a practical advantage for someone who prefers a less bulky call headset or wants to adjust how it sits.
Its listed hands-free operating range is up to 350 feet, and the headset has one-touch call and volume controls. The microphone is described as noise-cancelling, while wideband audio is intended to support clearer calls. The stated battery life is up to seven hours, with a three-hour charge time. Those details point to a call-focused tool for moving around a connected work area, not a general-purpose music headset.
At 21 grams, the headset itself is notably light according to the supplied specifications. The fit kit also gives buyers more than one way to wear it, which can be useful when a headband is inconvenient. But the system depends on its base and telephone interface accessories; it is not presented as a Bluetooth headset for pairing casually with any phone or motorcycle setup. The listed wireless technology is DECT, so shoppers should verify that their intended phone equipment supports the system.
For motorcycle-related searches, this is a poor match for riding communication: the supplied information does not describe helmet integration, water resistance or motorcycle intercom features. It may make sense for stationary calls in a garage or workshop if the connected phone setup is compatible. In my opinion, the main trade-off is straightforward: it is lightweight and call-oriented, but less flexible as an everyday wireless audio headset than the EPOS.
The Lenovo 115 is a wired stereo headset designed for computers and laptops. It uses an over-ear fit, memory foam earcups and a cable that supports USB-A and USB-C connections. For someone who mainly wants a dependable headset at a desk, the direct wired connection avoids managing a wireless pairing or headset battery.
The in-line control box provides volume, mute and call controls, with LED indicators. That means the essential controls stay on the cable instead of requiring software menus or a touch gesture. Lenovo also describes noise-cancelling settings through its Accessories Device Manager software. The listed weight is 140 grams, and the over-ear earcups may appeal to someone who prefers a closed-around-the-ear fit to the single-ear or on-ear styles in this group.
I would not recommend it as a motorcycle headset. The data describes a PC-and-laptop headset, not a model designed for a helmet or for use while riding. A shopper looking for hifi stereo on ear headphones for motorcycle use should also note that the Lenovo is over-ear and wired, rather than an on-ear Bluetooth design. In my opinion, it makes the most sense for buyers who want a straightforward computer headset and value physical controls over wireless freedom.
Jabra Evolve2
The Jabra Evolve2 is a wired, single-ear headset with a microphone. It connects through a USB-A/USB-C cable, and the supplied description says it works across online meeting platforms. Its mono wearing style leaves one ear uncovered, a useful arrangement for calls when you still want to hear the room around you.
The headset weighs 92 grams according to the listed specifications. It uses push-button call controls and sound isolation, with the product description emphasizing noise isolation to limit distractions. That is a different approach from the EPOS model’s adaptive ANC: the Jabra is a wired, single-ear meeting headset, not a wireless stereo headset with active noise cancelling.
This could suit someone who spends much of the day on computer calls and wants a light, uncomplicated connection. USB-A and USB-C support broadens the range of computers it can connect to, but the cable limits movement, and the mono design is not aimed at immersive music listening. It is a narrower tool than the Lenovo if stereo sound and over-ear coverage are priorities.
The motorcycle use case is an even bigger mismatch. The information provided does not say it is made for helmets, outdoor riding or motorcycle intercom use. It is best understood as a work headset. In my opinion, it is a sensible option for single-ear office calls, but not a substitute for a dedicated motorcycle communications system or wireless earbuds designed for that purpose.
How We Picked
The ordering is my independent editorial opinion, based on how well those details serve the stated use cases.
No brand paid for placement.
No. The supplied information describes office, computer and telephone headsets; it does not identify any as a motorcycle headset or intercom. Check for helmet compatibility and riding-specific safety features before choosing equipment for use on a motorcycle.
The EPOS Impact 1061T uses Bluetooth, while the Plantronics PLNCS540 uses DECT with a base. The Lenovo 115 and Jabra Evolve2 are wired USB headsets.
The Lenovo 115 and Jabra Evolve2 are both wired and support USB-A and USB-C connections. Lenovo offers stereo over-ear wear and an in-line control box; Jabra is a lightweight, single-ear option.
Not necessarily. These four products are described for work calls, computers or telephone systems, and their specifications do not establish motorcycle suitability. For riding, look for equipment explicitly designed for helmet fit and motorcycle communication.
• Lemin 5.3 vs CCYLEZ Earbuds comparison
• GEVO Ear Cushions Replacement vs Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.