ICON Control Reading Group
Purdue University
Purdue University
The purpose of this control reading group is to enhance our learning by leveraging the outstanding control community at Purdue. We initiated our first reading group in Summer 2024 with a small number of members. Our goal is to meet once a week (in-person) to discuss new articles, book chapters, and research developments in control and related areas. The list of topics, papers, and facilitators is determined before the semester begins. During each meeting, we have a focused discussion of the selected paper/topics after a brief presentation. We do require attendees to read the paper before the meeting.
There are certain expectations from people joining the reading group-
Read: Read the paper (material) before the meeting (Making a small set of notes always helps.)
Show up: Be present at most of the meeting
Participate: Ask questions, give comments, share your ideas, can also criticize
Optional but preferred: Be a facilitator once in a while. This includes presenting and facilitating the discussion.
Before the semester begins we'll collect a pool of papers from everyone and the final list of papers and facilitators will be decided during the introductory meeting. The semester will be broadly divided into 3-4 phases, each phase covering one main topic. The first meeting of each phase will be dedicated to gaining a fundamental understanding, making it easier for people who may not be familiar with the area. The main of interest include but not limited to:
Optimal control and robust control
Adaptive control
Stochastic control
Data-driven control and learning based methods
Reinforcement learning & game theory
Robotics and Human-Robot Interaction
Anything in the domain of controls, dynamics, and autonomy
(Note: Please avoid pure machine-learning papers as these might not be well suited for this group given it is a control reading group.)
We’ll have one facilitator per meeting. The facilitator will present 15-20 min of a brief overview of the paper following a 50-60 min discussion.
Some ideas for the facilitator to think of:
Provide an overview of the paper
Look for interesting critiques of the paper
Contextualize the work in the broader literature
Have some open questions