๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ซ-๐๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐๐ง๐ญ-๐๐ฐ๐ง๐๐
By Hanaa Ghadban
Find me on๐
๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ซ-๐๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐๐ง๐ญ-๐๐ฐ๐ง๐๐
By Hanaa Ghadban
๐ก๐พ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐?
We all know the feeling. The summer break ends, and a wave of exhaustion hits as we face the task of designing and decorating the 'perfect' classroom. This is often just one item on a long list, and the process is mentally and physically draining. But what if there was a better way, one that not only saved our energy but also empowered our students from day one?
The answer is to shift from preparing the classroom for students to co-designing and co-constructing the classroom with them. This isn't to say that teachers don't have a crucial role in preparing a welcoming, safe, inclusive, engaging, flexible, and adaptable learning environment. Instead, it's about fostering partnership, ownership, and a true sense of belonging through inviting students to co-design and co-create.ย
๐ฏ๐๐จ, ๐ฅ๐๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ-๐๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ , ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ!
๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ฒ๐ฌ
When posters are simply hung up all at once, they often mean very little to students and quickly become part of the classroom wallpaper. The point of hanging them is often to have a constant visual reference, but without context, whatโs the point? Our classrooms become overloaded with information and abstract concepts that lack context, which creates a clear absence of studentsโ agency, voice and ownership.
๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐๐ซ ๐จ๐ ๐๐จ-๐๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ค ๐๐ฐ๐ง๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ
Students truly make meaning of visuals when they are an active part of the process, connecting the display to their own learning journey. The point of hanging posters shouldn't be to provide a ready-made classroom, but to create a visible record of learning in progress.
Inductive Learning and Teaching for Conceptual Understanding
By Hanaa Ghadban
๐กDo you begin your units by explicitly presenting concepts and essential ideas, or by guiding students to reach conceptual understanding for themselves?
Two fundamental approaches to how we structure learning experiences are deductive and inductive teaching. While both have their place, understanding their nuances can profoundly shape how we foster true conceptual understanding.
Both approaches may incorporate inquiry learning and ultimately aim for students to grasp concepts and apply knowledge. However, they differ significantly in who does most of the cognitive thinking and how students arrive at conceptual understanding.
Deductive instruction offers speed and clarity by moving top-down from a presented essential idea. In this setting, most of the cognitive thinking is often done for the students.
Conversely, inductive instruction facilitates the integration of thinking and empowers student agency. This approach prioritizes student discovery, meaning-making, and the organic articulation of transferable conceptual understanding from the bottom-up.
Definitely, there is a place for both approaches in our classrooms depending on the instructional goals and student needs. For concept-based and inquiry educators, however, the inductive approach often serves as the cornerstone, empowering students to truly "own" their learning and build the conceptual architecture necessary for a complex world.
๐กWhich approach mostly lives in your classroom?
1
Guiding Questions: Educatorsโ Compass to Conceptual Understanding
By Hanaa Ghadban
โก๏ธHow can we empower our students to uncover big ideas and make lasting connections?
โก๏ธWhat types of questions can we craft to provoke the intellectual mind of our students?
Strategic questions mean more than just pulling them out of our back pockets or spontaneously producing them in class. It is an essential tool that requires intentional practice and refinement. While many in education may not have been explicitly taught how to intentionally craft different types of questions, or when to effectively use them to boost inquiry, learning, and above all, foster students' intellect, it's a skill we can all cultivate.
Questions are superior to learning objectives because they engage students' minds, hearts, and invite them to activate their thinking engines right away. This was an 'Aha!' moment for me during my concept-based certification journey with Professional Learning International
Guiding questions are a fundamental instructional tenet in the concept-based approach. They facilitate student thinking toward conceptual understanding through an inductive approach.
In topic-based lessons and units, questions target factual objectives, whereas in concept-based instruction, we target factual and conceptual levels of thinking. Concept-based teachers don't share the conceptual understandings with students. Instead, we intentionally use a mix of questions (concept formation, factual, conceptual, and debatable) to guide and nudge studentsโ thinking until they arrive at the targeted conceptual ideas for themselves.
๐Consider this an invitation to utilize questions as a powerful tool to open your lessons, units, and inquiries, and to refine your teaching and their learning.