If you want long battery life and adjustable noise control for jogging, choose CMF BY NOTHING Headphone Pro Active; if you need stronger stated endurance with ANC on and more flexible noise modes, choose Nothing Headphone 2026. Both are over-ear Bluetooth 5.4 headphones, so neither is a conventional pair of earbuds—and that distinction matters when you are moving.
If you want long battery life and a simple transparency toggle for jogging, choose CMF BY NOTHING Headphone Pro Active; if you need longer stated playback with ANC on and more adjustable noise modes, choose Nothing Headphone 2026. Neither is an earbud: both are over-ear headphones, a meaningful distinction when you plan to run.
My pick for jogging is CMF, based on its stated 50 hours of playback with ANC on and its easy-to-understand noise control. Nothing has the stronger endurance claim overall and more ANC settings, but its over-ear design still may not suit someone looking specifically for the best Bluetooth earbuds for jogging.
CMF BY NOTHING Headphone Pro Active vs Nothing Headphone 2026 at a Glance
• CMF BY NOTHING Headphone Pro Active: Up to 50 hours with ANC on, a 40 dB adaptive ANC claim, and a direct transparency-mode toggle; the trade-off is that its ANC settings are described less extensively than Nothing’s.
• Nothing Headphone 2026: Up to 75 hours with ANC on, four ANC modes, and a five-minute charge claimed to add eight hours with ANC off; the trade-off is that its longest battery claim is 135 hours with ANC off.
• CMF’s sound features: LDAC, Hi-Res certification, a custom EQ, spatial audio, and a bass-and-treble slider; these options may appeal if you like shaping your listening.
• Nothing’s controls: A roller and paddle handle common adjustments, and a button can trigger camera functions; the camera feature works differently depending on the connected device.
• Choose CMF if you want long ANC-on playback, app-based sound shaping, and a simple way to switch into transparency mode.
• Choose Nothing if you prioritize its higher stated endurance, selectable ANC levels, and tactile physical controls.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-19 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
CMF’s case is built around listening flexibility. It has 40 mm dynamic drivers, LDAC support, and Hi-Res certification, with custom EQ and spatial audio available through the Nothing X app. A bass-and-treble slider gives the sound profile another adjustment point. If you like changing the character of your music rather than leaving everything at one setting, those features are relevant.
For movement, the most useful stated combination is up to 50 hours of wireless playback with ANC on and a button that switches to transparency mode. That makes the basic choice between reducing outside noise and letting ambient sound through relatively straightforward. The headphones also support Bluetooth 5.4 and have a 3.5 mm jack, so there is a wired option when Bluetooth is not what you want.
I’d consider CMF for someone who wants over-ear headphones for commuting, focused listening, or occasional jogging, and values sound customization. I would skip it if your requirement is specifically earbuds: this is an over-ear headset, not a compact earbud design. Its listed wireless range is 10 meters, but that fact alone does not establish how securely it will stay in place during a run.
Nothing puts battery endurance and adjustable noise control at the center of its appeal. It lists up to 135 hours of playback with ANC off and up to 75 hours with ANC on. The product also describes a five-minute charge as providing eight hours of listening with ANC off. Those are stated figures, not a guarantee of the same result in every listening setup.
Noise control offers more choice than a simple on-or-off approach. The headphones include transparency mode and four ANC settings: high, medium, low, and adaptive. If you move between different environments and want to select a mode for each, that range is a practical advantage on paper. Nothing also lists five HD microphones and spatial audio, along with LDAC and Hi-Res wireless certification.
Its roller and paddle provide physical ways to adjust playback, volume, and noise modes. A button can control camera functions, though the described behavior depends on the phone and whether its camera is already open. I’d look at Nothing if battery life, multiple ANC options, or physical controls matter most. I’d pass if I wanted earbuds for running, or if I wanted a simple, clearly stated ANC-to-transparency button rather than several modes to choose among.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best fit for long ANC-on listening → Nothing Headphone 2026. It claims up to 75 hours with ANC on, compared with up to 50 hours for CMF.
• Best for quick sound-profile adjustments → CMF BY NOTHING Headphone Pro Active. Its listed features include custom EQ and a bass-and-treble slider.
• Best for choosing among several noise-control levels → Nothing Headphone 2026. It offers high, medium, low, and adaptive ANC modes, as well as transparency.
• Best for a simple ANC/transparency switch → CMF BY NOTHING Headphone Pro Active. Its feature description says the ANC button toggles transparency mode.
• Best for tactile playback controls → Nothing Headphone 2026. Its roller and paddle provide physical controls for volume, playback, and noise modes.
• Best for someone looking for the best noise cancelling headphones for jogging → Neither is an obvious match. Both are over-ear designs; CMF states up to 40 dB of adaptive ANC, while Nothing gives more detail about its selectable ANC modes.
• Best for a multipoint Bluetooth headset for jogging → Neither based on the listed details. Both specify Bluetooth 5.4, but neither sheet specifies multipoint connectivity.
The jogging question is less about picking the longest battery claim and more about matching the product type to the activity. Both headphones have enough stated battery capacity for extended listening, but their over-ear format is not the same as the small, in-ear design many shoppers mean when searching for jogging headphones. Neither product’s listed details establish a secure running fit, so I would not treat either as a clear substitute for dedicated earbuds.
There are other everyday distinctions. CMF’s sound tools are more explicitly geared toward changing the listening profile: custom EQ, spatial audio, and a bass-and-treble slider. Nothing’s standout practical controls are its roller and paddle, plus the four-level ANC menu. If you often switch between quieter listening and awareness of your surroundings, that choice may appeal. If you want a more direct transparency toggle and expect to use sound customization, CMF is the cleaner fit.
The headphone-versus-earbud distinction also answers a common search mismatch. Someone searching for the best Bluetooth earbuds for jogging may be comparing products in the wrong category if these are the only two choices. Both are Bluetooth 5.4 over-ear headphones with a listed 10-meter range. The specs don’t tell us how comfortable either will feel while running, or whether either will stay put for a particular person, so those points should not be assumed from the battery or ANC figures.
My Verdict
That is a comparison between two over-ear headphones, not a claim that CMF is a dedicated running earbud. If earbuds are essential for your jogs, neither product matches that format.
No. Both are described as over-ear wireless headphones. If you specifically want earbuds for jogging, these products are not that form factor.
Nothing Headphone 2026 lists up to 75 hours with ANC on. CMF BY NOTHING Headphone Pro Active lists up to 50 hours with ANC on. Actual listening time can vary with use and settings.
Nothing lists four ANC levels: high, medium, low, and adaptive, along with transparency mode. CMF lists up to 40 dB of adaptive ANC and a button to toggle transparency mode.
Neither product’s listed details confirm multipoint connectivity, so I wouldn’t choose either on that basis. Both are over-ear Bluetooth 5.4 headphones; the available information does not establish that either is a secure fit for jogging.
• LICAEVEY Retractable vs HiHiniu Earpiece V5.3
• Wobeefuu USB C Headphones vs COOYA USB C Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.