cityDesign inspired by Max Kleeber and Darwin
cityDesign inspired by Max Kleeber and Darwin
The organic growth of cities in populations that grow out of non-colonized locations does not need to be considered with much care as the human systems evolve to support the evolution of sustainable systems. However, in many systems where colonization is the primary method for the deposition of human life on a land, these systems do not exist. Often, we see an unnatural system emerge that is a function of some form of system that was transplanted from the host colonizing country.
In almost all cases the colonizing country had a favoritism. This forms from the obvious motivation of colonization. Which would indicate that a group of people would leave one location in exploration of another. This has one of two causes, curiosity or expansion.
While the early movement of the civilization from Africa indicates a form of curiosity, the later expansions from established human bases indicates an intention for expansion of kingdoms. Thereby indicating a form of supremacy. It falls to reason therefore that someone would arrive in a new location and consider themselves to be in acquisition of some cause that would make them more worthy of being in that location.
As we see in animals, given examples like the arrival of the cane toad into Australia[1], when an organism has not evolved in a given environment it has a natural tendency to alter it significantly. There are typically no known checks and balances on its growth. There is no natural friction with its environment. These species tend to be eventually cause significant damage to the ecosystem often gaining the title of “invasive species”.
Human evolution has also seen a similar expansion. However, irrespective of method most of the known land has not been colonized. In addition, the indications in the “new world” lend one to see that the systems in those areas are being strained. The existence and resistance to things such as religion or having organized system that deport on one group of individuals being “supreme” no longer forms for a sustained way of organization.
Therefore the natural next question becomes how do we alter these systems to be able to create a healthier and sustainable environment for human existence. How do we re-engineer human systems to allow for the most harmonious way of life.
These questions have been asked previously. Though no formal school of thought currently exists beyond the traditional and outdated models of “city design” that rely mostly on the efficient movement of goods and resources there are biological systems that have been considered to bring a lens of organic engineering to the question at hand.
Economics is a principal and practice that is designed to have a function to people. Effectively, understood simply, economics is the abstraction of how ordinary people generate aggregate wealth that is used to create prosperity within their worlds. The prosaic and disproportionate value placed on the abstraction component of economics has allowed actors to effectively hack the key components of the system to concentrate wealth in such a way that it no longer effectively circulates within the entire system. As if the nutrients that would help grow healthy crops were only being applied in abundance on one side of the field leaving the rest untended.
Effectively money and the monetary system are no different than the nutrients needed to run the engine of growth that fuels prosperity for all components of the system. A cursory reading of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations[1], reveals that while his name and his work are largely used to justify the current state of economics, Adam Smith himself must be turning in his grave. He devotes not one, but several chapters to repudiating the practice of slavery and exploitive work. In fact, one could argue that The Wealth of Nations is actually a book written in defense of workers rights. He advocates for healthy wages, safe working conditions and prosperity through motivation and an ability to climb the ladder of success. All things abjectly missing in the current applied system of economics.
Economics as a discipline is only valuable if we do not have access the data needed to model and develop better informed systems. The assumptions about supply and demand, the complexity of how markets move no longer needs these hypothesized equations that have no true bearing or anchor to real life. There is no greater an impeachment of the discipline of economics than the complete and utter surprise of all economists world wide that the US had passed the point where its interest payments were higher than its debt payments a few years ago and experienced no cataclysmic collapse of the economy. Something that had been advocated by economists for years. The entire industry stood in silent congratulations of each other and patted themselves on the back with a vehement “I guess not”. While debt itself is not considered to be bad thing, the fact that no economist could explain what the authors favorite comic, John Oliver, could renders economics a mute field[2].
In addition the rampant explosion of poverty, and the prolific nature of business models like Uber that remove the Cost of Goods Sold, COGS, from their balance sheets without providing the basics needed for their “contractors” continues to force millions of hard working people to take up multiple jobs without making ends meet with neither job security, not any end in their condition.
Adam Smith, a man born to a woman who was widowed before her son saw the world for the first time. A man who barely made it to Oxford. Arrived there an outsider, and grew up on the wrong side of the town from all his classmates, would be turning in his grave. Adam Smiths version of capitalism can only be described as a man’s dream to emancipate his fellow peers from the toils of dangerous and unfair labor. He saw economics as a means to create sustainable and sustained prosperity for all.
Said another way, where bhudda tried to emancipate the soul of humanity and elevate it from its own pain. Adam Smith tried to emancipate its biology. It is considered heresy by this author that Adam Smith should be credited with the blood of billions in the name of economics when what we have truly built is institutionalized slavery.
Since economics and theology have failed us, a new design of the economy is needed that would predicate itself on a much more resilient system that is based in reality. Not theorized notions of supply and demand that negate the easily manipulated minds of consumers. There is no greater repudiation of the false narrative of the “efficient buyer” than the entire field of marketing.
The most resilient systems we see that have patterns that can be grafted onto the global economic system come from biological systems. Biological systems have an advantage that there is no room for error in these systems. They evolved effectively at peril of annihilation. There is no “good enough” in evolution. Thus these systems offer the most resilient systems that can be adapted to human needs while building safety guards in place. For is there is one thing about the human intelligence that is universal it is merely, some asshole is definitely going to ruin it for all of us. Therefore the economy needs to be idiot proofed to remove the jackass factor that is inevitable in every demonstration of human history.
The remainder of this paper looks at formulating a framework that grafts biological systems to human needs and engineers a new economic system that does not need to abstract a human being to work. Rather it is designed to optimize human health, not human suffering.
1. A human cell
2. Evolution
3. Human biological and psychological needs
From: Hilgardia [3]
Rejected connection:
Kleiber’s work denotes a connection between the size of an organism and its basal metabolic rate, he postulates that the grown in metabolic change is governed by size and an exponential increase to the power of ¾. His work is based on observational and experimental effects only and he cannot denote what in the organisms actually creates the specific processes that govern this aggregate effect. Therefore, Kleiber’s law is accepted as follows:
1. Organisms have a stable basal metabolic rate
2. An organisms metabolic rate is impacted by its size
Kleiber’s law is not accepted from the perspective of the specificity of the rate of change that would result from the growth in size. It is for this primary reason that the subsequent adaptations of his work onto economic and city planning models popularized by Geoffery West are rejected[4]. While West et al. do make a valid link between the work of Kleiber and city growth and economic models, they do not adequately define the units of aggregation, nor do they make a distinction between environment and organism.
Additionally there is no evidence to suggest that Kleiber’s law, which is an approximation, would hold with the same precision that it does for biological systems.
Kleiber is denoted to have described a fundamental pattern of growth and resource expenditure that would hold across disciplines with accuracy and rejected for the precision that is attributable to the equations that are used to calculate these rates. Therefore the fundamental components for grafting an economic theory from Keliber’s law will be done from his original work only.
In addition, the following variables are grafted from his work, to understand how it will hold for human organized economic models:
Principal 1: all human organizational units have a basal economic metabolic rate
Fundamental economic unit for design: one human being
Biological Variable
Economic Variable
Economic Definition
Animal/ Organism
Economic unit
Any individual or aggregate economic unit. Note the fundamental economic unit is one singular human being.
Single Organism
Single unit of economic value
Single collective of healthy economic units
Basal metabolic rate
Basal economic rate
Economic burn rate at homeostasis
Homeostasis
Functioning at healthy equilibrium
Healthy
Sustained well being
Addition not included in Kleiber’s work
Kleiber’s work largely studies the basal, at rest, metabolic rate of organisms. However all healthy life experiences variations in metabolic rates due to healthy activity. Metabolism is a process that is intended to facilitate the healthy experience of an organism. Therefore there are increases in metabolic rates that correspond to healthy activity. These rates of change of metabolic activity are not accounted for in Kleiber’s work nor are they accounted for in any subsequent adaptation his work into economic principles.
It is therefore important to consider the basal economic rate to reflect the basal metabolic rate in that it is a period of rest. When the economic unit is in neither a increased metabolic rate, growth, nor a depressed economic rate, contraction. Both growth and contraction are natural cycles for all life, therefore economic principles must take into account the attrition rate of individual economic units, during their lifetime and create adjustments accordingly.
Thus a time series view will be accounted for in the design of economic activity that would yield a variable potential for defining economic prosperity for each unit. A heterogeneous definition of economic prosperity and health is needed to account for the multiplicity of lived experiences and motivations of each individual.
No path to prosperity is considered to be unhealthy if it does not come at the expense of the other units that make up the economy.
Furthermore, it is important to have a holistic understanding of the motivation of economic units. Effectively people do not exist as cogs in a machine. Rather they are motivated by intrinsic psychological and theological forces that are person to them. An understanding of these factors can enable a healthier development of the economic ecosystem.
It is here that it is easy to meld Adam Smiths work with theological works to understand a better motivational reason for why people are happy and exists. Creating an economy that only serves the basal economic metabolic rate does not account for the innate need to “grow”. This inspiration can be taken from the prolific amounts of life that continues to be rich and staggering in evolution in both the Amazon Jungle and the Galapagos Islands. These locations have natural habitats that create an exceptionally rich environment for natural evolution. Both in terms of advancing natural selection, but more importantly advancing mutations.
From the perspective of human civilizations healthy development as planned through the lens of economics, the process of evolution is mimicked in the process of innovation. A detailed analysis and thesis to this effect is presented in Annex A on page 7. Effectively there are two types of innovation systems. These influences impact two parts of human evolution, the utilitarian and the non-utilitarian. Effectively mimicking how energy is used in the process of metabolism yet again.
The two patterns that emerge that seem to have cross linkages between each other:
Biology
Anthropology
Ecosystem Collapse
Civilization Collapse
A natural ecosystem, like a natural civilization experiences constructive and destructive forces. Often in natural systems that are non directionally static they experience effective mutations. Both constructive and destructive. Only heterogenous ecosystems seem to have been able to withstand these and sustain life over the long term such as the Amazon jungle. Making it the most valuable resources on planet Earth.
However most other systems experience growth, stability and then a destructive force causes ecosystem collapse. The exact same pattern emerges in civilizations. Civilizations are formed, they grow, they experience forces that are constructive to the status quo or destructive to the status quo. Eventually a destructive force that threatens the status quo rises and we witness civilization collapse.
We are at such a point in the modern global world today. However for the first time in human civilizational history, we have the working components to engineer our way out of civilizational collapse. It is important to recognize that we are not a geolocational civilization anymore. Nation states, provinces, governments these are formal systems of power and control. They no longer govern the civilization as a whole. Like tectonic plates these structures are now creating fault lines that are at odds with the overall potential growth of the human species as a whole.
Therefore we must first recognize that we are at the point of saturation for not only human life on earth, but more importantly the point of organizational control. The entire system needs to be re-networked. The only way to avoid civilizational collapse is to first understand that until now, we have predicated society on a stationary definition of the status quo. The status quo must be defined as a time series calculation. That is determined by, as the indigenous peoples have always done, the next 3 generations.
We must no longer defined the status quo as some archine idea of what those of us who are in our mid careers think must be achieved. We must return to the only framework that has ever made sense for long term prosperity of humanity and the earth. We must look 3 generations forward and 3 generations behind us. Building a world that is for the future 3 generations, while preserving and maintaining the values and principles that honor the 3 generations behind.
The seventh generation, us, are not part of the future or the past. We are only custodians of the present. We are the inflection point. As a working force. Any concentration of power, ambition or ego in the seventh generation, the current one that is the largest workforce in places and positions of influence, will be the predicating deciding factor for whether or not we are able to create the first amazon jungle of human civilization.
1. Indian Civilization
2. Indigenous Civilization
The two most stable forms of civilizations in modern day come from the Indian subcontinent and the indigenous civilizations. They form the best compliments to create a framework for how to build a sustainable model for a global civilization since they form two parts of an equation. As a first order integral.
The indigenous civilization gives us all the variables needed to ensure that if one human being is considered in isolation, and each human being is valued for their unique forms of existence, they are valued as they should be. Through a spiritual model that accounts for all types of souls. Including:
- Gendered individuals
- Non gendered individuals
- All spectrums of sexuality
- All spectrums of neurodiversity
- All spectrums of gender identity
The indigenous philosophies are the only philosophies known on earth inspired by a need to create a sustained balance while serving as mere custodians of the resources they acknowledge cannot be owned. While being responsible to both the future for the preservation of the resources they are in control of, and the past for ensuring that the mistakes and lessons from the elders are learned.
The Indian civilization formulates the closest second example of a civilization that accommodates these principles in a large population group where both homogeneity and heterogeneity of identity is preserved. It is therefore easy to study the ebbs and flows of concentration of power as it appears throughout historical context to create the form of a new world civilization that learns from our elders and reforms the global economy for our children.
We, those of us within the professional peak of our careers, fall within one of two categories now. Those who operate from self interest, and want to preserve the status quo for themselves. Given the concentration of wealth in the world today, the estimated number of these individuals at the worst case scenario of choice cannot exceed likely 10% of the global population. Or we form the second category, those who accept that we must have reform. As the matter predicates on choice, the second category can be 100% of those of us who are capable of making the change.
Those individuals with power and positions will have a disproportionate impact in deciding if the world comes to civilizational collapse or peace is formed. The direction of the inflection point is controlled by those who are willing to create prosperity for the future by learning from the past. Whether the contributions we make are monetary, intellectual or labor, we must choose and accept that we are no longer the dreamers. We are not the individuals who hold the course of the future, by no longer living in our past and accepting that we are the custodians of both. We are now the builders. Rich or poor. Educated or uneducated. Political or not.
The choice is ours.
Unstructured thoughts
Spark- the communist manifesto
Round the 1800s there is a huge influence of colonization. Effectively inhabited areas were considered not to be inhabited as they afforded more economic value to colonizing countries for that time. The vital thing here is to consider the economy-time specification. The expansion of colonial powers resembles closely the same propagation that invasive species have on environment. Invasive species would effectively be homogenous species that take over a local ecosystem and reform it for their own survival at the expense of the indigenous ecology.
While in the context of humanity and climate collapse it is unequivocal that questions of morality and humanity are evoked. However when we evoke the principles of evolution we see a more clinical and mathematical pattern emerge. That is not to say that the moral failings are not worthy of consideration. However for academic reasons these questions of morality will be abstracted out of this analysis and only the mathematical issues will be considered.
It is the opinion of the author that, every child matters. It will always be the opinion of the author that either all life matters or life has no meaning at all.
Let us now look more analytically at how the constraints as they pertain to economics and colonization evolve to present day.
Once an invasive species has expanded as far as it can, initially it does not seem to achieve homoeostasis with its environment. The R0 effectively tends to be much larger. This is largely because evolutionary and survival constraints have not yet emerged. Without these constraints there is no cause and no predicator for change, unless we speak of mutation. Culturally, mutations evolve as forms of art or enlightenment. Modern day mutations have had a very interesting and unique presentation in the discipline of what should be classified as a new form of art. The first wave of technology development.
However there has not been much economic reason for these colonial forces to achieve homeostasis until now. Once a species spreads it then experiences constraints for the first time and undergoes a form of self collapse. The environment can no longer sustain them and since there is no self generated resilience developed any stressor will create cataclysmic effects.
While to those experiencing these seemingly challenging cultural impacts, this is but a natural form of evolution seen in biology. With one very distinct advantage. There is no need for species collapse. It is incredibly simpler to create cultural evolution and help create a healthier ecosystem through a few key changes that encourage a form of cultural “scaffolding”.
The concept of scaffolding is not merely used in construction, but rather mediums have been created to overly them on top of environments that need remediation. These scaffolding agents form the nodes of change and promote healthy growth. Eventually filling in the blank spaces and reforming an environment into health.
While it is important to continue to have healthy conversations about historic rights and wrongs, it would appear that there needs to be a form of healthy “right to forget” applied at the civilizational level. Tragedies and inhumane actions like genocide, slavery, and religious wars are endemic in human history.
It is foolish and impractical to think that any human civilization will somehow eradicate a phenomenon that has existed for millennia. The difference in perspective that needs to be applied is that there is always a risk of an invasive species. One that would cause such a human event. This cannot be predicted. However by creating cultural resilience, not unlike the healthy amazon, the likelihood of such an event can be reduced.
The advantage we have in modern day is, through moral or immoral methods the earth and every corner of it has been “seeded” with the seeds of human life. Furthermore, while not completely covered, most of the planet has also been effectively connected through the internet. There are no more siloed geographical cultures. Therefore the opportunity before us today is how to capitalize on this new earth. This new human civilization that can indeed be formed on the principles of equality and equity.
Stagnating in a constant standing wave of us vs them, is now a choice. Being plagued by preventable challenges like war or famine or climate change is now a choice. We are seeing an unprecedented collapse of “nationhood”. Concepts like patriotism are becoming more holistic, conforming now to a general sense of human connection and human well being.
It is important to understand in terms of organizational efficiency, the human population has reached a saturation point and can no longer be thought of as individual cultures. It must therefore be deliberately connected. Through a network of cultural, economic and social scaffolding. By engineering healthy nodes on the trifecta of organizational systems that people rely on, it is not merely possible, but certain that a future of prosperity can be engineered today by building for all. For all economic activity that could be achieved through exploitation has been achieved. It is now the most competitive and the most “red ocean” of opportunity.
Ergo, the blue ocean of economic prosperity lies in building for peace. New business models, new economics can emerge now serving the needs that all humanity is desperate to not merely realize themselves, but they are willing to pay for them. Happiness. The “age of exploitation” is at a natural end. There is no power, no money and no advantage in pursuing such a strategy.
The ides of government itself as nationalistic states can be irrevocably altered by creating decentralized autonomous systems. There is an inevitability to the course of evolution. There will not be one attempt to change the tide. History illustrates that no movement in the change of civilizations happens in isolation. It is not a question anymore if we will save the planet. All species conform to serve the most basic biological imperative. Survival.
A new age has dawned. The counter to the age of exploitation will be the age that, like the amazon, creates sustained life. We are in the age of love.
Unstructured thoughts
Vibrational Frequencies: Mechanical System Overview
For the purposes of this design framework a mechanical system will used as a baseline as it formulates a simple system that can be grafted to the principles of social engineering. Mechanical systems are also extremely well understood and used in a variation of industries. For the purposes of this framework reciprocating machinery based compressors that are used to move natural gas will be used and they are well understood by the designer and graft easily to the challenges in social systems today.
A short explanation of these systems is offered here to formulate the background for this design.
[contact for images and pdf]
General Steps:
1. Non pressurized natural gas enters the compressor
2. The compressor is used to pump pressurized gas into a pressurized bottle. (Note while a two nozzle bottle is shown these can range from one to any number depending on the size of the bottle used.
3. The compressed natural gas enters the bottle
4. An outlet valve moves the gas into the piping system used to transport it.
Engineering Challenge:
Using compressors is an incredible effective method to compress gas, however due to the pumping action, back and forth from the compressors this creates acoustic pulses within how the gas is pressurized. These pulses can combine in any number of ways. If the bottle is the right size, these can lead to the creation of standing waves.
Definition:
Standing wave:
A standing wave is effectively a stationary wave pattern that is created in a medium that continues to move a wave in a specified vibrational pattern. Given that this is an effective stationary wave there are points along the bottle where the vibration is an inflection node and does not move.
Most common standing waves that can occur in this system:
[contact for images and pdf]
Figure 2: Most common standing waves that occur in reciprocating machinery
The key challenge with a standing wave occurs when the standing wave corresponds to the same frequence as a resonant frequency for the bottle.
Definition:
Resonant frequency:
A resonant frequency is the frequency at which any energy added to the system will build with the system. One of the simplest systems that benefits from resonant frequencies is a basic swing set. Energy added at the top of the swing will have the most impact on adding height to the swing.
In mechanical systems resonant frequencies are incredibly dangerous. Adding energy into a mechanical system such as one shown that moves natural gas at its resonant frequencies will cause mechanical vibrations in the overall system.
Figure 3: Simplified diagram for energy aggregation in a mechanical system
Any mechanical system operating at its resonant frequency will continue to build in energy until the mechanical vibrations cause the system to collapse. Effectively in a system such as the above shown this would be an unintended explosion to the network.
In order to avoid such collapse a very simple system of “baffles” can be created. These simply separate the bottle into sections and move the gas in a path that prevent any development of first or second order waves. The first and second order standing waves are a function of the length and mechanical properties of the bottle and system and can easily be calculated using standard vibration calculations.
[contact for images and pdf]
Most compressors easily avoid this challenge with having a standard operating revolution per minute frequency specified. This frequency is typically specified to be far away from the resonant frequency of the system.
Figure 5: Generalized idea of operating frequency vs resonant frequency
The key to the operating frequency and avoiding the stressed of the resonant frequency is to not stage the ramp up. The system should effectively be set to the operating frequency and should not slowly ramp up to the operating frequency. A ramp down effect will not take place near the resonant frequency. If the system begins to add energy at the resonant frequency, it needs to be turned off or quickly ramped up to the operating frequency.
With this generalized explanation of mechanical systems the following section will graft the system onto the social architecture as it stands today and propose a design to socially engineer the environment back to a healthy operating environment.
Social Frequency:
The effects of social media have operated very similarly to adding energy into a human system at what simulates a social resonant frequency. Therefore either a baffle architecture needs to be created or the system needs to move into a healthy human operating frequency fast. Or both would ideally be the safest options to avoid future ramp up into the resonant frequency.
Since the system is a human social system. The resonant frequency can be defined as a generalized climate of hate and fear. These two compounding emotional frequences are being powered by social media and now by general polarized political environments globally.
The frequency or the technical issues being used to add energy to the system are:
1. Women’s right
2. Minority rights
These two issues have created an effective two pole system. And created an “us” and “them” environment. This is currently operating as the two sides of the resonant frequency. Where one side is adding to the anti message and the other side is attempting and incremental ramp down. An incremental ramp down will not work.
Effectively the entire conversation about diversity and rights needs to be suspended. To remove one pole. And an entirely new conversation needs to begin far away from the initial resonant frequency.
For example, a conversation that completely pivots from the question of rights, yet would consider them a forgone conclusion would better serve to change the entire social narrative. A conversation about “innovation” or “economic prosperity” would inherently assume that all people would be included.
Any debate on the topics of a “for” or “anti” bipole on these two issues will only serve to continue to add negative energy in the system at a frequency that will continue to polarize society.
Multiple conversations across networks about art, culture, innovation and prosperity that could be elevated with a larger voice, a more unified and louder energy system would serve to kill the resonant frequency of hate by rendering the conversation mute. Remove one pole.
In addition technical baffles to the existing system through a controlled redesign of online spaces, AI, Social Media and human resources would effectively kill the initial wave that is generated by the developers of these systems who were of one gender and one race overwhelmingly.
It is not the conclusion of this paper or design that the system was created to specifically target any groups. Rather a cultural civilization that innovated software was disproportionately biased to one group. That one group had socialized biases. Those biases, without a baffle network would naturally aggregate in the system with no check and balances.
Therefore, now that the resonant frequency at which that system was going to add energy has been achieved, and it is detectable, simple redesign of these systems with a cultural shift towards a more productive third conversation where both the “us” and “them” group can find common ground should re-engineer the system back to civilizational health.
It is irrelevant how many new conversations begin. The only thing of relevance is that those conversations be interlinked and geared to a more productive movement of civilizational growth. And all parties can, theoretically, join that group. Adding and elevating voices across all cultural demographics, corporate, political, arts into that one or few directions will which the system in as much time as it takes to change the news cycle over 3 sustained months assumption the “how habits form” framework is applicable on a system level.
An adoption of 70% would most likely tip the scales and create a momentum shift that can be sustained organically. With 63% of the global population wanting action on climate reform and climate transition being an optimistic possibility for innovation and economic prosperity as well as a social renaissance a simple system to empower people to see changes happened would activate the population to both contribute and rehabilitate themselves in a form of global mental health therapy.
The system would self correct.
Design system analogy:
The entire system can be viewed as an analogy. The compressor system can borrowed and the social system can be grafted onto the compressor system with the following analogies:
[contact for images and pdf]
Analysis:
The challenge at present is that a resonant wave has built in the social system of hostility. A wave being amplified by the fact that it is vibrating at a natural fault line for all people. The wave and message is being controlled by a few people, who are using platforms to keep adding energy at the same message frequency. Effectively natural gas is being pumped at a slow rmp into a bottle which is going to create an energy build up that will blow the system.
Is the problem is reframed then, the natural gas needs to be added to the system faster, except the messages need to be HETEROGENIOUS. They cannot be one topic only. The current message needs to be drowned out. This is incredibly easy to achieve with very few modifications. The same architecture can be used by:
1. Add more messages to create confusion on the topic being discussed. A LOT more topics need to flood the common attention
2. Use the same media to spread the messages in the system. It doesn’t matter if they are positive or negative. Real or fake. Just flood the system to flush out the current message
3. Speed up transmissibility. Just ramp up the speed at which the other messages flood the system. Exponentially. As fast as possible. It is irrelevant what the speed is. The speed is as fast as achievable and faster than the toxic message
4. Use amplifiers in real life to reinforce the reality of the message. Influences, cultural icons, people who have inferred authority who can use the mics they have now to start talking about any of the messages that make sense to them. DO NOT use an inferred authority that does not know about the topic, to speak about the topic. If they do, then make them curious. Use the idea of curiosity.
5. Curiosity being publicly noted as a point of uncertainty in self knowledge allows for both self doubt, and encourages the process of learning. Make this a twinge of fun. Create a note of interest. Draw the audience into the process so they also get curious and then begin to create an opening for the process of self-doubt in intellectual messages. This will create the condition needed to amplify the reach of the other messages
6. Create a new system.
Note- if the same system is maintained then a baffle needs to be created to ensure that such a concentration of power does not occur. In the current system there is not checks and balances for the concept of truth. Therefore it does not matter if the messages spread are true- revealing the system for its fundamental flaw will restore the actual social system because in reality people are not experts on everything. Therefore inject that ridicule and reveal the flaws of the system, as if, someone using the internet for research on a real topic is, indeed, relaying on stupid information. It will restore the credibility of actual experts. The current internet has no means to create accountability and transparency. V1 needs to go. If it is to be re-used
Use an external blockchain digital identity to create a digital trail that validates who wrote what and if they are qualified. No names need to be traceable. Avatars can be maintained but the check would be real and anonymous. No bots can exist as it should be pegged to real world identity. Create the gutter. By paving the road. If eth is used then u can pay ppl for their data as well. Or they can volunteer it. They get a say.