2° Edition of the workshop aims at fostering discussion about the state of the art on regulations for AI and how to use AI for regulations 

(and more generally in the legal domain). 

What are the strengths and the weaknesses in using AI? Is it transparent, accurate, and trustworthy enough?

The European Union was one of the first major jurisdictions to introduce a comprehensive legislation for AI, and it is expected that many more jurisdictions will follow the EU lead. 

The IT market is a global and transnational market, in which one system is developed in a country,  deployed in another country, and accessed in a third one. Accordingly, in this trans-jurisdictional context, the AI Act will have will be impacting the European market and the worldwide market. Other countries will regulate AI systems, the harmonization of different norms will be needed for stakeholders and enterprises in the field. The AI Act is the first strong restrictive regulation on AI systems, therefore, it is impacting the development of further regulation and the economy of the global market in general. 

Also, with the rapid growth of AI solutions, AI tools will be used in various domains deemed as sensitive and high risk (e.g. the Law field, the Health field etc.) Accordingly, what AI tools are used in sensitive and high-risk domains?  Are there areas of the legal domain in which AI tools can be successful? How can we certify these AI systems against AI regulation?

For any information write at: chairs.clairvoyant@gmail.com