Reader

Seminarliteratur

Berghold, J. Thomas, S. (2012) Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 1, jan. 2012. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3332

Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178), 1436-1437.

Dickel, S., & Thiem, C. (2016). Bestellte Massen. Auf dem Weg zu einer Theorie des Crowdsourcing, In: Stephan Lessenich (Hg.) 2017: Geschlossene Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 38. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Bamberg 2016. http://publikationen.soziologie.de/index.php/kongressband_2016/article/view/618/pdf_197

Eitzel, M.V. et al., (2017). Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 2(1), p.1. https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/article/10.5334/cstp.96/

Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One term, five schools of thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp. 17–47). Cham/ Heidelberg/ New York /Dordrecht/ London: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2

Franzen, M. and Hilbrich, I. (2015). Forschen in Gesellschaft Citizen Science als Modell für die Sozialwissenschaften? WZB Mitteilungen Heft 150 Dezember 2015 https://www.wzb.eu/sites/default/files/publikationen/wzb_mitteilungen/s26franzenhilbrich.pdf

Heiss, R. and Matthes, J. (2017). Citizen Science in the Social Sciences: A Call for More Evidence. In: GAIA 26/1: 22 – 26. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/oekom/gaia/2017/00000026/00000001/art00008

Kieslinger, B., Schäfer, T., Heigl, F., Dörler, D., Richter, A., & Bonn, A. (2017). The Challenge of Evaluation: An Open Framework for Evaluating Citizen Science Activities. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/enzc9

Mayer, K. (2017). Re-situating participatory social research: Open and Participatory Citizen Social Science (in print)

Purdam, K., (2014). Citizen social science and citizen data? Methodological and ethical challenges for social research. Current sociology, 62(3), pp.374-392.

Schäfer T. and Kieslinger, B. (2016). ‘Supporting emerging forms of citizen science: a plea for diversity, creativity and social innovation’. Journal of Science Communication (JCOM) 15 (02), Y02.

socientize (2014). Whitepaper on Citizen Science for Europe. https://www.zsi.at/object/project/2340/attach/White_Paper-Final-Print.pdf

Wynne, B., (2007). Public participation in science and technology: performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 99-110.

Empfehlungen

Citizen Science: Theory and Practice https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/

Aibar Puentes, E., & Lerga Felip, M. (2016). Wikipedia as Open Science: non-expert involvement in controversial scientific issues. http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/handle/10609/56384

Aiello, L. M. (2016, April). The Sensorial Map of the City. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 529-529). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

Cornish, F., Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T., 2013. Collaborative Analysis of Qualitative Data. In U. Flick, W. Scott, & K. Metzler, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 79–93.

Davies, S. (2016). Participation as Pleasure: Citizenship and Science Communication. In J. Chilvers & M. Kearnes (Eds.), Remaking participation. Science, environment and emergent publics (pp. 162–177). Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge.

Dickel, S., & Franzen, M. (2016). The “Problem of Extension” revisited: new modes of digital participation in science, 15(1), 1–17.

Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An analysis of citizen science based research: usage and publication patterns. PloS one, 10(11), e0143687.

Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Sagarra, O., Oltra, A., Palmer, J. R., Bartumeus, F., Diaz-Guilera, A., & Perelló, J. (2016). Active and reactive behaviour in human mobility: the influence of attraction points on pedestrians. Royal Society open science, 3(7), 160177.

Haklay, ME; Antoniou, V; Basiouka, S; Soden, R; Mooney, P; (2014) Crowdsourced Geographic Information Use in Government. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction & Recovery (GFDRR), World Bank: London, UK.

Irwin, A., 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. Psychology Press, UK.

Irwin, A., 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public understanding of science, 10(1), pp.1-18.

Jasanoff, S., 2003. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), pp.223-244.

Levin, N., Leonelli, S., Weckowska, D., Castle, D., & Dupré, J. (2016). How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(2), 128–141. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0270467616668760

Milan, S. (2016). Liberated Technology: Inside Emancipatory Communication Activism. In Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice (p. 107). London: MIT Press.

Ottinger, G. (2009). Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(2), 244–270. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0162243909337121

Pomerantz, J., & Peek, R. (2016). Fifty shades of open. First Monday, 21(5). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/6360/5460

Poncela-Casasnovas, J., Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Gracia-Lázaro, C., Vicens, J., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Perelló, J., ... & Sánchez, A. (2016). Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games. Science Advances, 2(8), e1600451.

Pournaras, E., Nikolic, J., Velásquez, P., Trovati, M., Bessis, N., & Helbing, D. (2016). Self-regulatory information sharing in participatory social sensing. EPJ Data Science, 5(1), 14.

Prainsack, B. (2014). ‘Understanding Participation: The ‘citizen science’ of genetics’. In P. B., W.-F. G. and S. S. Farnham (Eds.), Genetics as Social Practice (pp. 147–164). U.K.: Ashgate. http://www.academia.edu/3552182/Understanding_Participation_The_citizen_science_of_genetics

Riesch, H., Potter, C., & Davies, L. (2013). Combining citizen science and public engagement: The open AirLaboratories Programme.Journal of Science Communication, 12(3).

Quercia, D., Schifanella, R., & Aiello, L. M. (2014, September). The shortest path to happiness: Recommending beautiful, quiet, and happy routes in the city. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media (pp. 116-125). ACM. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.1031.pdf

Sagarra, O., Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Bonhoure, I., & Perelló, J. (2015). Citizen science practices for computational social sciences research: the conceptualization of pop-up experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.06575.

Sui, D.Z., Elwood, S. and M.F. Goodchild (2013). Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge. Berlin: Springer.

Vohland, K., Dickel, S., Ziegler, D. and Mahr, D., 2015. Virtuelle Bürgerwissenschaft-Digitale Ansätze in Citizen Science Projekten. Projekt "Bürger schaffen Wissen-Wissen schafft Bürger"(GEWISS).

Wylie, S. A., Jalbert, K., Dosemagen, S., & Ratto, M., 2014. Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research. The Information Society, 30(2), 116–126.

Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F. & Uzzi, B., 2007. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), pp.1036–1039.