Aibar Puentes, E., & Lerga Felip, M. (2016). Wikipedia as Open Science: non-expert involvement in controversial scientific issues.

Aiello, L. M. (2016, April). The Sensorial Map of the City. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 529-529). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

Berghold, J. Thomas, S. (2012) Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 1, jan. 2012.

Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178), 1436-1437.

Cornish, F., Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T., 2013. Collaborative Analysis of Qualitative Data. In U. Flick, W. Scott, & K. Metzler, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 79–93.

Davies, S. (2016). Participation as Pleasure: Citizenship and Science Communication. In J. Chilvers & M. Kearnes (Eds.), Remaking participation. Science, environment and emergent publics (pp. 162–177). Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business.

Dickel, S., & Franzen, M. (2016). The “Problem of Extension” revisited: new modes of digital participation in science, 15(1), 1–17.

Dickel, S., & Thiem, C. (2016). Crowdsourcing: Zur Versammlung produktiver Kollektive. In J. P. Wulfsberg, T. Redlich, & M. Moritz (Eds.),1. interdisziplinäre Konferenz zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung dezentral - vernetzt - kollaborativ. Hamburg.

Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One term, five schools of thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp. 17–47). Cham/ Heidelberg/ New York /Dordrecht/ London: Springer.

Franzen, M. and Hilbrich, I., Forschen in Gesellschaft Citizen Science als Modell für die Sozialwissenschaften?.

Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Sagarra, O., Oltra, A., Palmer, J. R., Bartumeus, F., Diaz-Guilera, A., & Perelló, J. (2016). Active and reactive behaviour in human mobility: the influence of attraction points on pedestrians. Royal Society open science, 3(7), 160177.

Haklay, M., 2010, ‘Extreme’ Citizen Science, London Citizen Cyberscience Summit, London, UK, 2-3 September.

Haklay, ME; Antoniou, V; Basiouka, S; Soden, R; Mooney, P; (2014) Crowdsourced Geographic Information Use in Government. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction & Recovery (GFDRR), World Bank: London, UK.

Irwin, A., 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. Psychology Press, UK.

Irwin, A., 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public understanding of science, 10(1), pp.1-18.

Jasanoff, S., 2003. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), pp.223-244.

Levin, N., Leonelli, S., Weckowska, D., Castle, D., & Dupré, J. (2016). How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(2), 128–141.

Milan, S. (2016). Liberated Technology: Inside Emancipatory Communication Activism. In Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice (p. 107). London: MIT Press.

Ottinger, G. (2009). Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(2), 244–270.

Pomerantz, J., & Peek, R. (2016). Fifty shades of open. First Monday, 21(5).

Poncela-Casasnovas, J., Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Gracia-Lázaro, C., Vicens, J., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Perelló, J., ... & Sánchez, A. (2016). Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games. Science Advances, 2(8), e1600451.

Pournaras, E., Nikolic, J., Velásquez, P., Trovati, M., Bessis, N., & Helbing, D. (2016). Self-regulatory information sharing in participatory social sensing. EPJ Data Science, 5(1), 14.

Prainsack, B. (2014). ‘Understanding Participation: The ‘citizen science’ of genetics’. In P. B., W.-F. G. and S. S. Farnham (Eds.), Genetics as Social Practice (pp. 147–164). U.K.: Ashgate.

Purdam, K., 2014. Citizen social science and citizen data? Methodological and ethical challenges for social research. Current sociology, 62(3), pp.374-392.

Riesch, H., Potter, C., & Davies, L. (2013). Combining citizen science and public engagement: The open AirLaboratories Programme.Journal of Science Communication, 12(3).

Quercia, D., Schifanella, R., & Aiello, L. M. (2014, September). The shortest path to happiness: Recommending beautiful, quiet, and happy routes in the city. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media (pp. 116-125). ACM.

Sagarra, O., Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Bonhoure, I., & Perelló, J. (2015). Citizen science practices for computational social sciences research: the conceptualization of pop-up experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.06575.

Schäfer T. and Kieslinger, B. (2016). ‘Supporting emerging forms of citizen science: a plea for diversity, creativity and social innovation’. Journal of Science Communication (JCOM) 15 (02), Y02.

socientize (2014). Whitepaper on Citizen Science for Europe.

Vohland, K., Dickel, S., Ziegler, D. and Mahr, D., 2015. Virtuelle Bürgerwissenschaft-Digitale Ansätze in Citizen Science Projekten. Projekt "Bürger schaffen Wissen-Wissen schafft Bürger"(GEWISS).

Wylie, S. A., Jalbert, K., Dosemagen, S., & Ratto, M., 2014. Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research. The Information Society, 30(2), 116–126.

Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F. & Uzzi, B., 2007. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), pp.1036–1039.

Wynne, B., 2007. Public participation in science and technology: performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 99-110.