I am an Assistant Professor in Applied Microeconomics at the Johannes Kepler University Linz. I am also a Research Affiliate at ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin.
I received my PhD in Economics from the University of Cologne in 2025. During my PhD, I visited Erasmus University Rotterdam.
I am an applied economist who uses history as a laboratory to study questions of labor economics and political economy using microeconometric methods.
You can find my CV here.
Working Papers
Worker Displacement and Labor Market Success: Evidence from Forced Labor Conscription during WWII
Disruptions of labor market trajectories have lasting effects on later economic success. Displacement due to forced labor conscription is a disruption that remains understudied despite its continued prevalence in contemporary contexts. I investigate the consequences of exposure to forced labor conscription for individuals' long-term labor market outcomes. I exploit the fact that cohorts of Dutch civilians faced a differential probability of temporary labor coercion in Nazi Germany during WWII in a Regression Discontinuity Design. Using Dutch census data from 1971, I find that conscripted individuals have lower education, income, and probability of employment. Analyzing heterogeneous effects, I find that exposure to harsher conditions in Germany is associated with reduced labor force participation and poorer health. My findings suggest that the negative impact on labor force participation is mitigated when individuals are conscripted to work in sectors that are also present in the Netherlands, which enhances their ability to reintegrate into the workforce.
Missing Men and Women's Demand for Political Representation
with Barbara Boelmann
Over the past century, women have gained formal political rights, yet remain under-represented in leadership – partly due to lower demand for representation among women themselves. In this paper, we shift the perspective from why men extended political rights to women toward what shaped women's own demand for representation. Specifically, we study how male absence during World War I affected German women's demand for the franchise, exploiting exogenous variation in drafting intensity across regions for identification. To make demand for political representation directly measurable, we construct a newly digitised panel dataset of the universe of German suffragette clubs – a revealed-preference measure of demand, given the considerable costs of maintaining a club, especially under wartime restrictions on political activism. Our results show that women were more likely to keep suffragette clubs open in counties with greater male absence. This effect is driven by regions where women publicly led war relief efforts, pointing to agency and specifically women's experience in visible leadership roles as the central mechanism. We further show that this demand for representation persisted after the franchise was extended, with women more likely to run for parliament and to vote in counties with greater wartime male absence and a suffragette club.
Work in Progress
Strikes and the Social Contract: Elite Response to Labor Mobilization
with Erik Hornung and Noam Yuchtman
submitted
We study the effects of labor mobilization on the social contract. We collect novel, disaggregated data on strikes in turn of the century Prussia, a setting in which workers were disenfranchised. We find that in locations experiencing more strikes, the elite rewrote the social contract: (i) public spending shifted towards redistribution; (ii) the bourgeoisie publicly expressed support for extension of the franchise to the working class; (iii) representatives voted for franchise extension; and, (iv) representatives were elected from parties eventually supporting franchise extension. Event study and IV estimates suggest a causal effect of strikes on the social contract.
Forced Melting Pot: Temporary Migration and the Formation of Economic and Social Ties
with Ann-Kristin Becker
This paper studies whether temporary migration can generate lasting social and economic ties. We examine this question in the context of forced migration in Germany during World War II. We exploit the quasi-random assignment of foreign forced migrants across German counties to estimate whether temporary exposure to migrants shaped subsequent regional ties with migrants' origin countries. We link archival data on the location and nationality of forced migrants to measures of social connectivity, foreign direct investment, and joint patenting between German counties and migrants' origin countries. Using a gravity model, we find that German counties exposed to more migrants from a given origin country developed stronger bilateral social and economic ties with that country after migrants had returned home that persist until today. The effects are driven by personal connections and are somewhat more pronounced where wartime conditions were less severe and cultural similarity was greater.