1. Forethought Phase
This phase is where goals and beliefs are initiated. The first major part of it is task analysis, which means setting specific proximal goals based on personal circumstances and planning effective strategies considering the resources and time needed to achieve these goals. These plans serve as blueprints for subsequent actions. The other major part, self-motivation, begins with learners’ beliefs about their success, such as their self-efficacy (personal capability to learn, Zimmerman, 68) and optimistic or pessimistic outcome expectations, as well as their valuing of the task, such as intrinsic interest (students value the task skill for its own merits, Zimmerman, 68) or learning goal orientation (valuing the process of learning itself, Zimmerman, 68).
For instance, a student has decided to master everyday Spanish conversation within six months. He first analyzed the task, set specific goals such as “practicing listening for half an hour every day,” and planned the use of learning software and textbooks. Confident in his learning ability and with a strong interest in Spanish culture, he believes that this goal is worth investing in and is achievable.
2. Performance Phase
This phase is where motivation is maintained through action. Learners manage their learning and take responsibility for it through self-control (the deployment of specific methods or strategies chosen during the forethought phase, Zimmerman, 68) and self-observation (recording personal events or self-experimentation to find the causes of these events, Zimmerman, 68). Key self-control methods include imagery, self-instruction, attention focusing, and task strategies. Additionally, effective self-observation, including conscious recording of learning performance and outcomes, enhances self-control and helps identify any potential learning strategies that may need adjustment.
For instance, this student employs learning strategies such as using flashcards to memorize vocabulary, shutting off all distractions to focus intently during listening practice, and envisioning the joy of achieving his goals which spurs him to persevere when wanted to give up. Additionally, he consistently records his learning performance and effectiveness at various times and places. He finds that memorizing vocabulary is more effective in the morning and thus adjusts his schedule to study vocabulary every morning.
3. Self-Reflection Phase
This phase is crucial for determining whether motivation is amplified or diminished, affecting subsequent forethought processes and even the entire cycle. The first major part is self-judgement, which involves comparing self-observed performance against some standards (such as one’s prior performance or an absolute standard of performance, Zimmerman, 68) and attributing the results. Attributing failure to controllable processes rather than fixed ability better sustains motivation because it implies that different strategies may lead to success. Another major part, self-reaction, involves feelings of self-satisfaction and emotional experience regarding one’s performance. It takes the form of defensive reactions, such as avoiding learning to protect one’s self-image, or adaptive reactions, which aim to improve learning effectiveness (Zimmerman, 68). Learners’ reflections shape their self-beliefs and influence their adjustments for future learning methods.
For instance, after a period of study, the student compares his current spoken language recordings with those from the beginning and evaluates his progress. He finds that he has made significant improvements but is still not fluent. Instead of attributing this to a lack of language talent, he attributes this to the “insufficient practice of sentence patterns.” It allows him to feel satisfied with his progress so far, reinforces his belief that effective effort leads to success, and prompts him to adjust his strategy by deciding to increase focused practice on sentence patterns.
Their motivation follows an enhanced cycle pattern. They:
• design specific and achievable proximal goals based on their true circumstances.
• possess good time management and resource integration skills.
• have confidence in themselves and their learning abilities, often achieving better grades.
• clearly recognize the value of the tasks they are undertaking.
• have intrinsic and enduring motivation.
• have strong self-control, the ability to maintain focus, and the discipline to execute their plans.
• continuously monitor their performance and emotions, paying attention to and accepting them.
• are good at conducting constructive reviews based on monitoring results and making adjustments.
• attribute failures to controllable processes and make adaptive reactions.
Their motivation falls into a diminished cycle pattern. They:
• set vague or overly ambitious and unattainable goals.
• lack self-efficacy and belief in their abilities.
• fail to see the value of any ongoing tasks for themselves or their lives.
• easily get distracted and have difficulty focusing on tasks and implementing goals.
• often complete assignments at the last minute under pressure, and the quality is usually not guaranteed.
• have fragile motivation and rely on external comparisons or evaluations.
• lack reflection and review of their performance.
• attribute failures to fixed abilities and do not believe that strategy adjustments can change the status quo.
• tend to react defensively and escape to avoid harm.
Each of these motivational patterns has several observable effects on student learning, as well as future achievement that have been experimentally demonstrated. SRL's key strengths appear to be long term, leading it's application, or lack thereof, to be equally far reaching. Unlike other approaches to early childhood learning, HighScope "put children in charge of parts of their day,"
SRL’ benefits (as measured by research in the HighScope program, a sort of test run of SRL analized in (Schweinhart, 2004)) are long term, students who are able to self regulate consistently score higher on assignments across the board and meet greater personal success in their lives outside of academia. HighScope children were 14 percent more likely to be employed; were 20 percent more likely to earn more than $20,000 per year (60 percent versus 40 percent.)(Schweinhart, 2004).
One interesting observation from the HeadStart program was that initially it appeared to produce disappointing results. In the short term, despite an initial spike in measured IQ scores, students would return to about average in a matter of years. At or around 14 however, students scores rebounded and they went on to meet even greater success in their lives. This shows that SRL programs,especially early childhood ones, can have positive effects—not necessarily by immediately boosting academic performance (which appears to be a relatively short-lived benefit), but rather by helping children develop the basic skills they need to meet success down any path they choose to walk.
"To observers they (self regulated learners) are self starters who display extraordinary effort and persistence during learning." (Zimmerman, 1990, p. 5)
"These learners high self efficacy, self attributions, and intrinsic task interest" (Zimmerman, 1990, p. 4)
Overall a self regulated learner can be identified by the diligence, commitment, and adaptability they bring to any task they set their minds to.
SRL is an especially useful theory in that whilst it is concerned with the skills it takes to overcome any challenge one may face in their learning, but places few restrictions on what those struggles have to be. This means that the lack of SRL can be measured less as a set of behaviors, and more so as a set of outcomes. That is not to say that poor self regulatory skills are entirely undetectable, there are a couple of things to look for such as :
Students giving reactive responses to their poor performance (Zimmerman, 1990, p. 8)
Students believing that their efforts are unlikely to pay off, often learned from past failures (Zimmerman, 2002 p. 68)
Students placing a large stock in the role played by "grit," claiming the key is just to work harder (Zimmerman, 1990, p. 8)
Students choosing not to put a serious effort into assignments due to lack of interest
Students creating vague or unreasonable goals (Kelly, 2002, p. 1090)
Students not reflecting on their work (Efklides, 2011, p. 20)
Procrastination
Many times students have difficulty completing assignments because there are other, more interesting things they would rather do. (Zimmerman, 1990)