Calculator Fx 3600p Download

Recently, I shot a Casio 9850GB+ on a "different" aucion site for cheap. After playing with it for some _minutes_, I decided to put it up on eBay and asked myself, when was the last time I've been amazed by a Casio calculator. Well, it probably was when the fx-180p came out. Since then I wrote a lot of programs for it.Today, I pulled a 3600p (one brother of the 180p) out of my drawer and found it still kept a program in memory that does something interesting. Took me quite some time to find the flow chart to this program. My question is, how would you solve the following problem on either the 180p or the 3600p (probably the programming model on the rare 190p is the same, so you can use it, too):For any x >= 0, find the smallest y >= x that is the square of an integer.E.g., for 0, the calculator should return 0. For 5, it should find 9You likely have to use both P1 and P2.Hope some of you are owning one of these wonderfull calculators and enjoy programming as mch as I do! Re: Fun with the Casio fx-180p / fx-3600p

Message #2 Posted by Chuck on 13 Aug 2009, 1:52 p.m.,

in response to message #1 by Thomas Radtke

Unfortunately I don't have one of those calculators, but I did get an FX-9860G slim yesterday; first casio I've ever had. On this, I created the function Y1=(Intg(-sqrt(x))^2. The "Intg" is the greatest integer function, and so should work on any calculator that has this function. Just not sure how to impliment it on the aforementioned calculators. :(CHUCK Re: Fun with the Casio fx-180p / fx-3600p

Message #3 Posted by Thomas Radtke on 13 Aug 2009, 2:50 p.m.,

in response to message #2 by Chuck

Calculator Fx 3600p Download

Download 🔥 https://urlgoal.com/2y7NN5 🔥

Thank you for your interesting answer, Chuck! It's a nice idea to use the floor function on a negative number. Unfortunately, the old Casios don't have any of those integer functions, so a loop has to be considered. The problem is to keep it inside the 38 steps limit of these calculators. In addition, they offer very limited branching capabilities. And of course, you're typing in programs blindly.Edited: 13 Aug 2009, 2:53 p.m. Re: Fun with the Casio fx-180p / fx-3600p

Message #4 Posted by Xerxes on 13 Aug 2009, 6:34 p.m.,

in response to message #1 by Thomas Radtke

Quote:(probably the programming model on the rare 190p is the same, so you can use it, too)Due to the lack of the K vars, only the short solutions are usable on the FX-190/191.The FX-180P was my first programmable bought in 1980, so thank you forthe fun with the powerful keystroke dialect of this calculator. ;-) Re: Fun with the Casio fx-180p / fx-3600p

Message #9 Posted by Thomas Radtke on 15 Aug 2009, 7:38 a.m.,

in response to message #8 by Xerxes

Quote:The FX-180P was my first programmable bought in 1980, so thank you forthe fun with the powerful keystroke dialect of this calculator. ;-)It was also my first programmable :-). Thanks for participating![ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

If you have a Casio fx-3600P that is no longer working, you can first try replacing the CR2025 3V battery. If that doesn't solve the problem, then you can consider replacing the calculator with a modern equivalent. We suggest the following current model as a replacement:

I just built my system and I am pretty new to the OC scene. XMP worked fine for 3200/16, no problems there. I watched some videos and followed DRAM calculator to the dot. Both the Safe and Fast settings did not work.

I just want a stable 3600/16 and I've seen a lot of threads over at r/Amd with people having an easy time getting this with my kit. Also, I've read some articles that mention the "Multiplier" settings while overclocking ram but DRAM calculator does not show this info and I havn't been able to really learn how that factors into RAM OC.

Like @ImperialKnightErrant said, you are not really going to see much difference on those timings. If you would like to see How RAM Speed and Timings work, you can watch these 2 Techquickie videos below. They are form a while ago, but still relevant. Also you can Google for a RAM speed calculator, or here is a link to a very simple RAM Speed Calculator. If you don't want to use the website, Luke (bottom video) covers it in his video at 1:27, but the calculation is: (CAS Latency / RAM Speec) x 2000 = Latency in Nanoseconds.

I just received this calculator today, a gift from a friend in Hungary (thank you, Istvn!) Battered as it may look, this older Casio machine still works perfectly. Like other lower-end Casio programmable machines of the same vintage, the fx-3600P offers a full complement of scientific functions, but its programming model is very limited. Program storage is limited to 38 program steps. A simple set of conditional instructions allows the program to be restarted from the beginning, but no other control transfer is possible. No facilities are provided for reviewing or editing programs.

Not too long ago, I thought that 38 program steps and a limited branching capability make this calculator inadequate for a problem as complex as my favorite programming example, the Gamma function. But then I received an e-mail from Herman van Elburg who pointed out that this calculator offers full memory arithmetic (all four functions) on its six K-registers; moreover, the operations are fully merged (i.e., Kin tag_hash_116 6 uses only one step in program memory.) Herman quickly followed up with another e-mail, a working implementation of the incomplete Gamma function, and a pretty good one at that! Unlike the algorithms I used for the incomplete Gamma function elsewhere, Herman's even works for negative arguments. Needless to say, I am suitably amazed. 006ab0faaa