In academic year 2023-2024, Cal State LA focused on building college-level expertise with QM Experts-at-Large, sustaining our long-term success in our signature Online Course Development Program (OCDP), as well as offering a hybrid course design and development option.
Since the program began, 226 courses have passed a Quality Matters Preparatory Review, the highest number in the system for this type of review. An additional 22 courses are currently in review or being amended to meet QM Standards.
We are excited to report that 19 courses went on to receive full QM National Certification.
We set the following goals for AY 23-24:
Goal 1: Work with 50 faculty in our in-house Designing Online Courses program (OCDP Option 1) in AY 2023-2024.
Goal 2: Support 30 faculty to complete QM IYOC (OCDP Option 2) in AY 2023-2024.
Goal 3: Create a new QM Expert-at-Large program.
Goal 4: Submit 50 courses to QM Preparatory Review (online or hybrid). Support faculty amendments to meet QM Standards, passing QM Preparatory Review.
Goal 5: Submit 20 courses for review and formal QM Certification. Support faculty amendments to meet QM Standards, passing QM Certification.
We believe the OCDP program continues to positively influence shared governance. In spring 2024, the Academic Senate passed a revised Accessible Instructional Materials policy. Our quality assurance strategy has slowly built up shared language and understanding among the faculty of the importance of accessible instructional materials, an important dimension to course quality. Further, an accessible materials remediation service, first developed for OCDP, has since been made available to the entire campus (AIM for Student Success).
Despite serious system-wide budget concerns, the Provost’s Office continues to generously support the Online Course Development Program (OCDP), offering three pathways to prepare courses for the fully online format. Well designed, high quality courses positively impact student success. OCDP quality assured courses on average have lower student DFW rates, a critical factor in improving our campus retention rates.
Courses are nominated by college deans so that departments and programs can strategically prioritize courses that should be offered fully online or hybrid. The Center for Effective Teaching and Learning (CETL) helps oversee the program, supporting faculty and courses through course redesign, and with QM Preparatory Review.
Jeff Suarez-Grant, Interim Associate Director of Academic Technology, Center for Effective Teaching and Learning (CETL)
Catherine Haras, Executive Director
Kris Bezdecny, Associate Director
Naat Jairam, Online Programs Sr. Designer and Coordinator, OCDP Option 1 Lead Facilitator
Carl Schottmiller, Equity Programs Sr. Designer and Coordinator, Quality Matters Coordinator
Amy Bippus, Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs
Emily Acevedo, Interim Associate Provost
Sunny Moon, Assistant Vice President
Yusuke Kuroki, Associate Director
Karin Elliot Brown, Interim Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies
Margaret Garcia, Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies
Harkmore Lee, Associate Vice President, International Programs and Global Engagement, and Dean, College of Professional and Global Education (PaGE)
The following numbers of faculty completed QM workshops:
Improving Your Online Course: 21
Designing Your Online Course: 5
Applying the Quality Matters Rubric: 1
Teaching Online Certificate: 1
The following numbers of courses passed QM Prep Review
107 courses have passed QM Preparatory Review
Three cohorts of faculty designed the following numbers of courses in our online course development program:
By Term Completed:
Summer 2022: 43 courses
Fall 2022: 24 courses
Spring 2023: 23 courses
By Option:
Option 1: 58 courses
Option 2 (IYOC): 17 courses
Option 3: 15 courses
46 faculty members completed the Accessible Instructional Materials webinar and submitted an accessible version of their syllabus.
Our three eLearning Specialists completed the OLC Instructional Design Certificate.
Quality Assurance Lead, Jeff Suarez-Grant served on the QM 7th Ed. Rubric Update Committee.
Reporting Period June 1, 2023 to May 31, 2024
The following numbers of faculty completed QM workshops:
Improving Your Online Course: 6
Applying the Quality Matters Rubric: 2
Peer Reviewer Course: 2
Master Reviewer Certification: 1
QM Rubric Update 7th ed.: 14
Three cohorts of faculty designed the following numbers of courses in our online course development program:
By Term Completed:
Summer 2023: 21 courses
Fall 2023: 33 course
Spring 2024: 27 courses
By Option:
Option 1: 47 courses
Option 2 (IYOC/DYHC): 6 course
Option 3: 29 courses
Three colleges now have faculty fully trained to act as Quality Matters Experts-at-Large.
College of Business and Economics: 2 experts installed.
College of Health and Human Services: 2 faculty experts trained and currently negotiating their roles within the college.
College Natural and Social Science: 2 faculty experts trained and currently negotiating their roles within the college.
Our Quality Matters Coordinator, Dr. Carl Schottmiller, earned his Master Reviewer certification.
In this reporting period, the following numbers of courses are under review or have passed QM Prep Review:
20 courses in review or in the amendment phase
53 courses have passed QM Preparatory Review
In this reporting period, the following numbers of courses are under review or have passed QM Full Review Review:
19 courses have passed QM Full Review
This spring semester, we launched the AIM for Student Success initiative, offering a new service for digital instructional materials accessibility. The service was developed and first offered to faculty in the Online Course Development Program. After finding success in OCDP, we scaled it, offering it to all faculty.
To recognize faculty efforts to ensure their materials are acessible, we created the Accessible All-Stars Showcase.
In the coming program year, we're hoping to collaborate with QM Experts-at-Large and Institutional Effectiveness to determine:
Impact of OCDP on one or more student success measures: (1) reduction in DFUs and (2) closing of equity gaps.
Continue to analyze grade and student retention data in relation to faculty completion of OCDP. Compare student success measures to student satisfaction and faculty perceptions of course design.
Impact of OCDP on accessible instructional materials scores (Ally score).
Compare OCDP completion data for specific courses/faculty against historical Ally course accessibility data.
Impact of OCDP and QM Review process on faculty teaching regardless of modality.
Capture faculty sentiment on the course design process and beliefs on impacts on teaching.