If you want lightweight Bluetooth earbuds for music production and everyday listening, choose Boytond Ear Buds; if you need open-ear headphones with built-in MP3 storage for swimming, choose MARLALL Liquid Silicone Swimming. Boytond is the more practical fit for calls and hands-on controls, while MARLALL’s key advantage is playback without a phone connection underwater.
Boytond Ear Buds vs MARLALL Liquid Silicone Swimming at a Glance
• Boytond Ear Buds: Flexible earhooks, touch controls, and up to 12 hours of music playback per charge; the trade-off is that their Bluetooth connection is not a way to stream music underwater.
• Boytond suits listeners who want familiar earbud-style controls, calls, and long sessions between charges.
• MARLALL suits swimmers and outdoor users who want open ears and phone-free playback in the water.
Boytond’s strongest case is everyday convenience. Its soft, flexible earhooks are designed to stay in place during movement, and touch controls cover playback, track changes, volume, and calls. The earbuds can be used individually or as a pair, so you can choose mono or stereo listening. Bluetooth 5.2 handles the wireless connection, and the case recharges the earbuds between sessions.
Battery details make these a practical option for long stretches away from an outlet: each earbud is listed for up to 12 hours of music playback after a 1.5-hour charge. The case is described as providing multiple additional charges. A USB-C charging connection is also specified. For someone moving between a desk, commute, and workout, that combination makes more sense than a swimming-focused player.
I’d consider Boytond for calls, general listening, and activity where a secure earhook and straightforward controls matter. The microphones include CVC 8.0 noise reduction for calls, but that is not the same as a promise that recorded or streamed music will be free from surrounding noise. For music production, these can be a convenient wireless listening option, but the listed features do not establish them as studio-reference monitors. Skip them if your main need is listening to music while submerged: their listed Bluetooth setup and water-resistance details do not make them a swimming player.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-20 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
The defining feature is 32 GB of built-in MP3 storage. Bluetooth signals cannot transmit underwater, so the instructions call for switching to MP3 mode while swimming. In practice, that means preparing music on the device instead of expecting a phone to stream to it in the pool. For use outside the water, Bluetooth 5.4 supports a connection with a stated range of up to 10 meters. The listed weight is 22.68 grams.
Choose MARLALL if swimming is central to your routine and you want music stored on the headphones, or if an open-ear fit suits your outdoor activities. Its design is less aligned with someone seeking conventional in-ear stereo listening or extensive touch controls; no touch-control system is specified. It also isn’t the obvious pick for production work that calls for familiar headphone monitoring. The data describes a sports and swimming device, not a production reference tool.
• Best for music production as a casual wireless-listening use case → Boytond Ear Buds. They offer stereo or mono use, music playback controls, and a listed 12-hour run per earbud charge. That does not make them studio-reference headphones, but their control and call features suit general listening around a workday.
• Best for swimming with music → MARLALL Liquid Silicone Swimming. Its built-in 32 GB MP3 memory supports playback in the water, where Bluetooth streaming cannot reach the headphones.
• Best for calls and call controls → Boytond Ear Buds. The product lists a microphone with CVC 8.0 noise reduction and controls for answering and ending calls.
• Best for an open-ear design → MARLALL. Bone conduction leaves the ear canal uncovered, which may suit listeners who want to stay more aware of their surroundings.
• Best for long playback between charges → Boytond. Each earbud is listed for up to 12 hours of music on a charge, with the charging case providing additional charges.
• Best for adjustable retention during sport → MARLALL. Its adjustable straps are designed to help keep the headphones secure; Boytond instead uses flexible earhooks.
• Best for touch-based music and volume controls → Boytond. Its touch controls cover playback, song changes, and volume. MARLALL’s supplied feature details do not specify a comparable touch-control system.
• Best for phone-free music in the pool → MARLALL. Its MP3 mode is the relevant feature; Bluetooth is for use outside the water, not underwater streaming.
A shopper searching for the best touch control sleep headphones for music production should be careful not to treat that phrase as a feature match: Boytond does have touch controls, but the supplied details do not identify either product as a sleep headphone. Likewise, someone looking for the best with mic neckband headphones for music production should note that Boytond lists microphone and call features, but its earhook design is not described as a neckband. These distinctions matter more than trying to stretch either product into a category it isn’t.
My Verdict
That recommendation is for convenient wireless listening, not critical studio monitoring.
I’d choose MARLALL instead if swimming were the priority: its built-in MP3 storage addresses the underwater Bluetooth limitation directly.
For music production as the main use case, Boytond is my pick; for pool sessions, MARLALL is the clearer choice.
No. Bluetooth signals cannot transmit underwater, so the product description says to switch to MP3 mode while swimming. Its 32 GB of built-in storage is intended for this use.
For casual wireless listening alongside production work, Boytond has the more relevant listed controls and call features. Neither product’s supplied details establish it as a studio-reference headphone, so I wouldn’t treat either as a substitute for dedicated monitoring gear.
Yes. Their listed features include microphones with CVC 8.0 noise reduction for calls, along with controls for answering and ending them. That call-focused feature should not be mistaken for a claim about studio recording quality.
Boytond’s touch controls are specified for playback, track changes, volume, and calls. MARLALL’s listed strengths are its open-ear bone-conduction design and built-in MP3 storage; its supplied details do not describe an equivalent touch-control setup.
• EPOS Impact 100 vs HP Poly Focus 625: Slim on Ear Headphones
• Amazon Renewed JBL Tune 510BT vs homicozy Kids Ear Protection
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.