In MACROECONOMICS the level of aggregate demand = the amount of REAL GDP (goods and services) that all buyers in an economy are willing and able to buy at different possible INFLATION levels, in a year, ceteris paribus.
AD tells us how much households, firms, government, and foreigners would WANT to spend at different price levels
'CONSUMPTION SPENDING' = 'DEMAND by DOMESTIC HOUSEHOLDS for DOMESTIC OUTPUT'. Denoted by the letter 'C'.
'INVESTMENT SPENDING' = 'DEMAND' by DOMESTICALLY BASED firms, for DOMESTIC OUTPUT'. Denoted by the letter 'I'.
'GOVERNMENT SPENDING' = 'DEMAND by DOMESTIC GOVERNMENT for DOMESTIC OUTPUT'. Denoted by the letter 'G'.
'EXPORT SPENDING' = 'DEMAND by FOREIGNERS for DOMESTIC OUTPUT', both of which are denoted by the letter 'X'.
'IMPORT SPENDING' = 'DEMAND by C+I+G for FOREIGN-MADE OUTPUT', both of which are denoted by the letter 'M'.
"Life is good, jobs everywhere, I am fine spending now!"
CONFIDENCE: When households feel confident about the economic environment, future prospects, job security etc.., they tend to spend more money and vice versa.
"Money is cheap, I am going to borrow, borrow, borrow!"
INTEREST RATES: Interest rates are in effect the 'cost of borrowing' money, and therefore impact household spending in two ways, firstly the higher they are the less willing consumers are to take out loans to finance the purchase of goods and services, and secondly if they already have existing debt then changes in the interest rate will impact the size of their repayments, meaning their household disposable income will be directly impacted, which in turn impacts their ability to spend.
"My stocks are up, property price are up, I fell like spending...!"
WEALTH: Not to be confused with income, this refers to the estimated value of assets that a household owns, for example, real estate and shares. If these were to increase in value then the household will feel more wealthy, and as a result more willing to spend money as
"I've got more money in my pocket, I gotta spend it...!"
INCOME TAX: The amount of income a person has remaining to spend after-tax is referred to as 'Disposable income', therefore the income tax rate directly impacts the level of consumer spending.
"I've debt-free baby!, I feel free to spend...!"
INDEBTEDNESS: Clearly the level of debt impacts the amount of disposable income that a household have to spend.
"F.O.M.O., I gotta spend NOW...!"
EXPECTATION: When future prices are expected to rise, people often rush to spend in the present, and vice versa.
"The streets, malls, restaurants are all full, I am expanding now!"
CONFIDENCE: When businesses feel confident about the economic environment, future demand, price stability etc... they tend to spend more money on expanding their operations and vice versa.
"..the cost of borrowing is low, time to invest!"
INTEREST RATES: Interest rates are in effect the 'cost of borrowing' money, and therefore impact business spending in two ways, firstly the higher they are the less willing firms are to take out loans to finance the purchase of capital goods and services, and secondly if they already have existing debt then changes in the interest rate will impact the size of their repayments, meaning their profits will be directly impacted, which in turn impacts their ability to spend.
"We need an e-commerce site to compete, I am investing now!"
TECHNOLOGY: When new-technology is introduced, firms cannot afford to be left behind by their rivals therefore need to update their operations.
"We can keep more profits yay, I am investing now!"
CORPORATION TAX: The amount of disposable profit a business has to spend on capital goods and services depends directly on the level of corporation tax.
"We are debt-free, so I am ready to invest!"
INDEBTEDNESS: Clearly the level of debt impacts the amount of disposable profit that a firm has to spend.
"The bank's are practically begging me to borrow, I am investing now!"
ACCESS TO CREDIT: The correlation between access to credit and the ability of firms to engage in investment spending is obvious. During economic downturns, banks may be unwilling to lend money, and if they do, they may attach very high interest rates.
"I am 100% confident that any profits I make won;t be stolen!"
PPR PROTECTION: Private Property Rights (PPR) are taken for granted in most developed nations, however in lesser developed countries in which the rule of law is not enforced, lack of protection of PPRs can mean entrepreneurs are reluctant to engage in investment activity, in fear that their gains will be taken from them.
"Yikes, too much demand and not enough supply, prices are skyrocketing, let's reduce our public spending, shhhhhhhh!"
BOOM: A boom is a period of rapid economic expansion resulting in higher GDP, lower unemployment, a higher inflation rate, and rising asset prices. Booms usually suggest the economy is overheating with demand greater than the potential creating a positive output gap and inflationary pressures, hence the government use policies such as contractionary fiscal policy (Less Gov’t spending) to reduce demand. (‘See Lawson Boom UK’)
"OMG, no-one's spending we need to kickstart some economic activity, fire up the printing press, let's spend some money!"
TROUGH: A trough is the stage of the economy's business cycle that marks the end of a period of declining business activity and the transition to expansion. The government can help in the recovery bY stimulating demand via expansionary fiscal policy (More gov’t spending)
"Our curency has dropped in value against other countries, no wonder we have so many tourists buying our stuff!"
EXCHANGE RATE: The exchange rate refers to the Price of one currency in terms of another currency. Clearly, if the price of your currency rises in terms of another, your currency can buy more of the other currency, hence the price of their imports is cheaper in your currency, however, your exports are now more expensive in terms of their currency.
"Brazilians, Russians, Indians, and Chinese, are all generating higher incomes, and of course this means more demand for our stuff!"
FOREIGN INCOME: Demand for exports is very much dependent on the income and economic situation within your trading partners. If they are in an expansionary phase then the demand for your exports should be growing.
"We have signed a Free trade agreement with the US, so our stuff is much cheaper!"
TRADE BARRIERS: A trade barrier is designed to reduce the demand for imports, in order to protect domestic producers from competition.
"What would happen to price and quanity if demand increased by 10%?" "What would happen to price and quantity if both demand and the costs of production increased by 10%?"
"What's the link between wages and prices?"
"If you went to the local supermarket and on your current wage you could afford 10 apples, then 3 months later you could only but 9 apples what would you think/do?", "What if it fell to 8 apples after 6 months?...", "What if you started noticing all the items you regularly spend money on was rising?"
Imagine that the economy has a fixed capacity of willing and able factors of production, that accept the current purchasing power of their factor payments, when employed, and as a result create a certain (maximum) amount of GDP. Now if demand increased and firm's knew they could make more profits by selling more, this output level would be surpassed right! How? By asking the existing factors to work more, and/or tempting factors not willing to work to enter the market.
As a direct result these factors would be in such high demand (Excess demand) that their factor payments (e.g. wages) would start to be pushed up (As is always the case when a shortage exists), which would eventually seep into higher prices for everyone, including these factor owners, who would, realise that to maintain their purchasing power they must ask for even higher wages right!
This factor payment-price upward spiral means that it is no longer profitable for firms to produce beyond the previous capacity as any higher prices they have are now
AGGREGATE SUPPLY refers to the TOTAL QUANTITY of goods and services DOMESTICALLY PRODUCED in an economy at all given AVERAGE PRICE LEVELS in a given period of time, as measured by REAL GDP.
However, the relationship between AVERAGE PRICE LEVEL and REAL GDP differs between the SHORT-RUN and the LONG-RUN, creating two distinct curves.
In the MACRO-SENSE the SHORT-RUN refers to a TIME-PERIOD in which FACTOR PRICES, such as wages are FIXED (INFLEXIBLE), and DON'T CHANGE when the AVERAGE PRICE LEVEL CHANGES.
In the MACRO-SENSE the LONG-RUN refers to a TIME-PERIOD in which FACTOR PRICES, such as wages are FLEXIBLE, and ADJUST TO CHANGES IN THE AVERAGE PRICE LEVEL CHANGE.
If AD rises and the APL RISES in the SR the wage that a worker receives ('The NOMINAL WAGE') LOSES 'REAL' VALUE in terms of its purchasing power, in other words, THE REAL WAGE FALLS WHEN THE APL RISES.
Workers are initially unaware of this fall in value, plus they tend to have contracts that have fixed wages and this inability to increase wages and restore their real values means 'REAL COSTS DECREASE' while the prices that firm's can charge rises so firms will have A PROFIT INCENTIVE TO PRODUCE MORE, in this time period.
However, In the LR working contracts will eventually end and WORKERS having noticed that their real wage have fallen will SEEK HIGHER NOMINAL WAGES in order for their 'REAL WAGES' to regain their purchasing power, in other words, THE REAL WAGE IS RESTORED. This rise in costs for the firm makes the original profit motive disappear.
When the APL FALLS in the SR the fixed wage that a worker receives ('THE NOMINAL WAGE') GAINS 'REAL' VALUE in terms of its purchasing power, in other words, THE REAL WAGE RISES WHEN THE APL FALLS.
This inability to reduce wages and restore their real values means 'REAL COSTS INCREASE' and firms will have NO CHOICE but to REDUCE PRICE and OUTPUT, hence the SLOPE of the SRAS curve.
In the LR working contracts will end and FIRMS will OFFER LOWER NOMINAL WAGES in order for their 'REAL WAGES/COSTS' to regain their real purchasing power, in other words, THE REAL WAGE IS RESTORED.
Wages are usually CONTRACTUALLY FIXED, in addition, government regulations such as the MINIMUM WAGE will prevent wages from falling, whilst TRADE UNIONS will threaten to go on strike to prevent this from happening. Finally, firms will be reluctant to offer lower wages (even though the real value is the same) out of fear that it will DEMOTIVATE THEIR WORKERS.
STICKY FACTOR PRICES (WAGES): As mentioned above, wages are very INFLEXIBLE, both downwards and upwards in the SHORT RUN, and it is this level of inflexibility that gives producers the PROFIT INCENTIVE to PRODUCE MORE when the PRICE LEVEL RISES and the LOSS REDUCTION INCENTIVE to PRODUCE LESS when the PRICE LEVEL FALLS:
Think about it, If the UNIT PRICE that you can sell your product for RISES, whilst your FACTOR COSTS STAY THE SAME then it is PROFITABLE for you to supply more, hence the upward slope of the supply curve.
Similarly, If the UNIT PRICE that you can sell your product for FALLS, whilst your FACTOR COSTS STAY THE SAME then it is UNPROFITABLE for you to supply more, in fact, you will be losing money so you will likely reduce Qs, hence the upward slope of the supply curve.
THE REASONS FOR A SHIFT IN THE SRAS ARE SIMILAR TO THE REASONS FOR A SHIFT IN THE SUPPLY CURVE FOR A SPECIFIC GOOD IN THE MICRO MODEL.
CHANGES IN WAGES: If wages INCREASE, with the price level constant, firms’ costs of production rise, resulting in a LEFTWARD shift in the SRAS curve and vice versa.
CHANGES IN OTHER RESOURCE PRICES: Changes in the price of non-labour resources, such as the price of oil, equipment, capital goods, land inputs, and so on affect the SRAS curve in the same way as changes in wages.
CHANGES IN BUSINESS TAXES: Business taxes are taxes on firms’ profits, and are treated by firms like costs of production. Therefore, HIGHER taxes on profits are like INCREASES in production costs, which shifts the SRAS to the LEFT.
CHANGES IN SUBSIDIES offered to businesses. Subsidies have the opposite effect to taxes, as they involve money transferred from the government to firms. If they DECREASE, the SRAS curve shifts to the LEFT; and vice versa.
SUPPLY SHOCKS: Supply shocks are events that have a sudden and strong impact on short-run aggregate supply. Some supply shocks directly affect aggregate supply. For example, a war or violent conflict can result in destruction of physical capital and disruption of the economy, leading to lower output produced and a LEFTWARD shift in the SRAS curve. Unfavourable weather conditions can cause a fall in agricultural output, also shifting the SRAS curve to the left. For example supply-chain issues following COVID, UKRAINE-RUSSIA conflict etc...
--LONG-TERM ADJUSTMENTS---
--INCREASE IN AD--
In the SR, factor prices such as wages are fixed, therefore if AD increases, (EXPANSIONARY GAP) real wages falls meaning it is profitable for firms to raise prices and increase output.
Even though the firm is at full employment they can increase production by asking existing workers to do overtime, hiring unemployed workers, or running machines more intensively.
This is unsustainable, but possible in the short run because wages and contracts haven’t yet adjusted.
In the LR people realise that the cost of living has increased, but eventually in the long-run this loss of purchasing power is fully recognised and factor prices (wages) are renegotiated back to their real values, which increases the costs of production for the firms (Shifting the SRAS curve to the left), meaning the original profit incentive (available with fixed factor prices) has gone and so they reduce output and make the extra workers redundant as well as eliminate overtime hours reverting back to the original potential output.
--DECREASE IN AD--
In the SR, factor prices such as wages are fixed, therefore if AD decreases, (CONTRACTIONARY GAP) real wages rise, meaning the costs of production rise, forcing then to reduce output.
Even though the firm is at full employment they can increase production by asking existing workers to do overtime, hiring unemployed workers, or running machines more intensively.
This is unsustainable, but possible in the short run because wages and contracts haven’t yet adjusted.
As mentioned above, the quantity supplied decreases as factor payments are fixed and therefore the real costs of the firm has increased, while the price it can sell at has fallen hence they produce less and make staff redundant meaning they are above the NRU.
However in the long-run this gain of purchasing power is fully recognised and factor prices (wages) are renegotiated downwards to their real values, workers who don't accept will be replaced by those who were made redundant before (Don't forget the real wage has returned to normal now, just at a lower nominal rate) which decreases the costs of production for the firms, so they revert back to the original potential output level and the NRU returns to 3%.
So we can say that in the long run, factor prices adjust to the change in prices back to their real values, and output returns to the full-employment level at an NRU of 3%.
--INCREASE IN SRAS--
In the short-run aggregate supply (SRAS) curve shifts to the right. This could be due to falling wages, lower raw material costs, technological improvements, or higher productivity.
The new intersection with the aggregate demand (AD) curve occurs at a lower average price level (P↓).
Real GDP/output increases (Y↑) in the short run.
The economy experiences growth without inflationary pressure — sometimes called “supply-side growth”.
In the short run: Firms are able to supply more at each price level due to lower costs or efficiency gains. Households and businesses benefit: consumers enjoy lower prices, firms may expand output and employment rises.
In the long run, factor markets adjust as wages and other input prices eventually catch up with the lower costs and the higher output levels.
Once these costs adjust, the initial “windfall” to firms disappears.
The long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) remains fixed at FE
The economy settles back at the full employment output, but with a lower long-run price level.
So, in the long run:
--DECREASE IN SRAS--
If we imagine the economy is at its potential output level and (at full employment with say an NRU of 3%), and then it enters a CONTRACTIONARY PHASE with low demand, causing the average price level to fall, how will producers react?
They will initially think that the price decreases are specific to their industry and given that factor costs are all fixed, they will need to reduce their staff in order to cut costs and reduce the quantity they supply.
So, we can say that in the SR as the APL FALLS so too does the quantity supplied, with the equilibrium moving from 'A' to 'B', hence the slope of the SRAS.
Furthermore, we can say that in the SR as the APL falls following a decrease in AD, so too does the quantity supplied, moving from the 'full employment level of Real GDP, 'Yfe' to level 'Y1', this deviation below 'Yfe' is referred to as a 'DEFLATIONARY GAP'
But this scenario won't last forever?
As mentioned above, the quantity supplied decreases as factor payments are fixed and therefore the real costs of the firm has increased, while the price it can sell at has fallen hence they produce less and make staff redundant meaning they are above the NRU.
However in the long-run this gain of purchasing power is fully recognised and factor prices (wages) are renegotiated downwards to their real values, workers who don't accept will be replaced by those who were made redundant before (Don't forget the real wage has returned to normal now, just at a lower nominal rate) which decreases the costs of production for the firms, so they revert back to the original potential output level and the NRU returns to 3%.
So we can say that in the long run, factor prices adjust to the change in prices back to their real values, and output returns to the full-employment level at an NRU of 3%.
If we look at the two diagrams below, what can you infer about where the level of output lies once the factor prices adjust? That's right, it always returns to the full-employment level of output, and the only thing that changes is the price level.
So, if we were to draw the long-run level of output we would end up with a vertical line stationed at the full employment level of output.
So far we know this...
The LRAS curve represents the level of REAL GDP at full employment.at any one moment in time.
The Long term trendline in the business cycle represents the level of REAL GDP at full employment over time.
Therefore, the level of REAL GDP at the LRAS curve = a point on the Long term trendline
Therefore...
The INFLATIONARY/EXPANSIONRY GAP on the ADAS diagram caused by either a rise in demand or supply corresponds to expansionary periods of time on the business cycle when actual GDP is MORE THAN potential GDP.
The DEFLATIONARY/STAGFLATIONARY GAP on the ADAS diagram can be caused by either a fall in demand or supply and corresponds to contractionary periods of time on the business cycle when actual GDP is LESS THAN potential GDP.
When there is NO GAP on the ADAS diagram it corresponds to a period of time on the business cycle when actual GDP EQUALS potential GDP.
So far we have assumed that in the short-run during an expansionary phase the economy produces beyond its NRU, and as a result, prices and output will rise at the same time, and that eventually IN THE LONG RUN FACTOR PRICES WILL ADJUST UPWARDS and real values will be restored, meaning only prices will rise and output will return to its full-employment level.
Similarly, we have also assumed that in the short-run during a contractionary phase the economy produces below its NRU, and as a result, prices and output will fall at the same time, and that eventually IN THE LONG RUN FACTOR PRICES WILL ADJUST DOWNWARDS and real values will be restored, meaning only prices will fall and output will return to its full-employment level.
This readjustment mechanism, due entirely to market forces outlines the school of thought held by the 'NEW CLASSICAL' economists who overwhelmingly trust in these forces to solve most misallocations.
Whilst most economists agree, regarding the upward adjustment of prices during expansionary phases there exists some disagreement regarding the downward adjustment of factor prices (in particular the price of labour 'wages') during contractionary phases.
These economists come from the 'KEYNESIAN' school of thought, which cites real-world examples of wages not adjusting downwards during times of economic contraction, in particular during 'The Great Depression' in the US between 1929 – 1939.
It was observed that factor prices (wages) as well as product prices did not adjust downwards and were in fact 'STICKY' in the downward direction, meaning the economy gets 'stuck in the short run' and cannot return to the Long run full employment level, meaning output levels will remain low, while unemployment will stay above the NRU.
WAGES do not fall easily, even over long periods of time, because of a variety of factors such as labour contracts, minimum wage legislation; worker and union resistance to wage cuts.
PRICES do not fall easily either as the stickiness of wages means firms will avoid lowering their prices because that would reduce their profits. Furthermore, large oligopolistic firms may fear price wars; if one firm lowers its price, then others may lower theirs more aggressively in an effort to capture market shares, and then all the firms will be worse off. Such factors, it is argued, make prices unlikely to fall even in a recession.
We can see from the diagrams below that in the Keynesian diagram when AD falls from AD1 to AD2 prices do not fall and readjust like in the classical diagram. Therefore, the economy gets stuck at point 'd', in the SR and hence is 'Unable to move into the LR'.
The KEYNESIAN AS curve consists of three separate sections, which illustrate the relationship between output and price level as before, approaching and at the full employment level of output.
SECTION 1: CHANGE IN OUTPUT & NO CHANGE IN PRICE. Within this range of output, there exists an abundance of 'Spare capacity' in terms of unemployed factor resources therefore as output rises, there is no upward pressure on factor costs.
SECTION 2: CHANGE IN OUTPUT & CHANGE IN PRICE. Within this range of output, the availability of resources is running out and firms need to compete for these scarce factors by offering higher payments, which inevitably means they will charge higher prices.
SECTION 3: NO CHANGE IN OUTPUT & CHANGE IN PRICE. Within this range of output level, the economy has reached full employment, and beyond to a level of output that represents an NRU of 0%. as such only prices can rise while output is fixed.
We can use the Keynesian model to show basically the same scenarios as in the classical model, however, the main differences are as follows:
Factor costs won't automatically adjust downwards, and the economy can become stuck in a recessionary stage.
Unlike in the classical model, increases in AD will not always raise prices when in section 1.
The LRAS curve is stationed at a level of REAL GDP that is termed the 'full employment level of output', and this level is just a single point on the long-term trend on the business cycle, which as we know is upward sloping over time. This suggests that the LRAS curve regularly SHIFTS to the RIGHT, but what would cause this to happen? To answer this we need to consider those factors which 'PERMANENTLY' impact the productive capacity of the economy.
Increases in the QUANTITY of the factors of production: For example a growing population, Increases in net migration, the discovery of new mineral reserves, all increase the level of resources available.
Increases in the QUALITY of the factor of production: For example Improvements in education and training, a healthier workforce, all lead to greater productivity and output.
Improved TECHNOLOGY => PRODUCTIVITY of production: For example, workers who work with improved machines and equipment that have been produced as a result of technological innovations will be able to produce more output in the same amount of time.
Increases in EFFICIENCY: When an economy increases its efficiency in production, it makes better use of its scarce resources, and can as a result produce a greater quantity of output. Therefore, potential output increases, and the AS curves shift to the right. (Decreases in efficiency would shift the LRAS and AS curves to the left.)
INSTITUTIONAL changes: This point is related to efficiency in resource use because changes in institutions can sometimes have important effects on how efficiently scarce resources are used, and therefore on the quantity of output produced. For example, the degree of private ownership as opposed to public ownership of resources, the degree of competition in the economy, the degree and quality of government regulation of private sector activities, and the amount of bureaucracy can each affect the quantity of output produced.
Reductions in the NRU: Yes, you can actually decrease this for example by reducing the time it takes for people between jobs to find new jobs. Therefore, potential output increases, and the AS curves shift to the right. (An increase in the natural rate of unemployment would result in a leftward shift in the LRAS and Keynesian AS curves.)
SHIFTS IN LRAS WILL ALSO SHIFT THE SRAS: Any permanent increase in the productive capacity of the economy will also help firms in the SR to lower the cost of production, hence the SRAS will shift with any changes in LRAS.
NOT ALL SHIFTS IN SRAS WILL SHIFT THE LRAS: As already shown changes in the costs of production such as wages have only a temporary impact on output in the SR, but not in the LR.
SHIFTS IN LRAS WILL ALSO SHIFT AD: As we know output = income = spending, therefore we can assume that with greater output comes greater spending and aggregate demand, for example a larger labour force will make more goods and equally demand more goods.
Why do we study these two perspectives? Basically, so you can answer this very common P1 Macro question.
Every AD curve is based on a level of SPENDING GROWTH that is consistent along the entire curve, for example, say the amount of spending in $-terms increased by 5%.
But what did this extra 5% spending go on? Is it the purchasing of greater amounts of output (SPENDING GROWTH = REAL GDP GROWTH), is it simply the same quantity of goods with higher prices (SPENDING GROWTH = PRICE LEVEL GROWTH) or is it a combination of both (SPENDING GROWTH = REAL GDP GROWTH + PRICE LEVEL GROWTH)?
For example, with a SPENDING GROWTH of 5% we could have any of the following REAL GDP GROWTH & PRICE LEVEL GROWTH rate combinations
Therefore we can say THE AD CURVE REPRESENTS THE COMBINATIONS OF OUTPUT & PRICE LEVEL GROWTH ASSOCIATED WITH A CERTAIN LEVEL OF SPENDING GROWTH.
Obviously when spending growth rises the AD curve shifts right and vice versa.
As mentioned above the level of aggregate demand corresponds to the LEVEL OF SPENDING in the economy. This level of spending is directly correlated to the average price level:
THE WEALTH EFFECT wealth effect (wealth = value of all assets owned, including property, savings, stocks, bonds, etc); If the price level increases then the real value of wealth falls and people feel poorer and thus spend less.
THE INTEREST RATE EFFECT If the price level increases then consumers and firms need more money for their transactions =? demand for money 1l' =? interest rate 1l' =} cost of borrowing 1l' =? consumer and firm spending U due to lower borrowing =? there is an upward movement along the AD curve, from a to b on AD,
THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE EFFECT trade effect If the price level increases=} exports become more expensive to foreigners =? quantity of exports (X) demanded by foreigners U. Also imports (M) become relatively cheaper to domestic residents =? quantity of imports 1l' =? (X - M) U =? there is an upward movement along the AD curve, from a to b on AD,
Therefore we can say THE AD CURVE REPRESENTS THE COMBINATIONS OF OUTPUT & PRICE LEVEL GROWTH ASSOCIATED WITH A CERTAIN LEVEL OF SPENDING GROWTH.
Obviously when spending growth rises the AD curve shifts right and vice versa.