The plaintiffs argued the casinos were paying out worse odds than state regulations allowed, thereby illegally increasing the house edge. All had won games at odds of 6/5, rather than the more customer-friendly 3/2.

But they claimed it was illegal 먹튀없는 카지노사이트 to offer 6/5 blackjack in Massachusetts and the casinos should have paid out at 3/2.

As the lawsuit noted, with an average bet of $50 per hand, a customer could be expected to lose an additional $35.60 per hour playing 6/5 compared to 3/2.

The math is even more disturbing when you multiply this average expected loss by five players per table, by 20 tables offering the crooked Blackjack game at any given time, and by 24 hours the casino is open each day,” the suit contended.