IEEE RAS/EMBS 11th International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob 2026)
August 1-4, 2026, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Join the Challenge!
News: Team registration deadline extended to June 1, 2026. Click here for team registration.
The da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) is currently the most widely deployed surgical robotic platform in clinical operating rooms. Its success has been significantly supported by the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK), an open-source research platform that repurposes retired clinical da Vinci systems for research use. The dVRK has been adopted by approximately 41 institutions worldwide and has enabled substantial progress in surgical robotics research.
However, access to dVRK hardware remains limited to a small number of well-resourced institutions. Researchers without access to dVRK platforms face significant barriers to contributing to robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS). A main reason is that the dVRK is specifically designed for laparoscopic surgery, whereas many research laboratories only have access to general-purpose serial robotic manipulators.
Motivated by this disparity, this competition aims to bridge the gap between general-purpose robotic platforms and surgical robotic systems. The proposed challenge focuses on performing laparoscopic manipulation tasks using general-purpose robotic systems, thereby democratizing research opportunities in surgical robotics and teleoperation.
Participants from all career stages are welcome, including undergraduate students, graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, and academic or industry research teams.
Each participating team may consist of up to four members.
The participating teams should register for the BioRob 2026 conference in order for the final on-site competition.
The winning team will receive a CAD $3,000 award.
Hardware
Franka Emika Research 3 robot (7-DOF, Franka Robotics GmbH, Munich, Germany)
6-DOF Touch device (formerly known as Phantom Omni, 3D Systems, Inc., Cary, NC, USA);
Peg-transfer board (Fig. 1).
Contingency
We will aim to deploy the Franka Panda robots and haptic devices at the conference venue, but this depends on formal university approval and safety, insurance, and asset-control requirements. If off-site transport is not approved, the competition will be held in the university robotics lab (about 10 minutes away), with scheduled participant sessions and a live video stream for conference attendees.
Fig. 1 Example of the peg-transfer task platform.
Software Environment
Ubuntu 64-bit operating system
A basic development package will be provided to the participating teams.
Task Description
A peg-transfer board with two stacked levels will be fixed inside a box representing the abdominal cavity. Several small openings on the top surface mimic trocar ports in laparoscopic surgery (Fig. 1).
Participants use a haptic device with non-dominant hand to teleoperate the robot and transfer as many pegs as possible from the lower level to the upper level within a 3-minute time limit.
Collisions between the tool and the environment are allowed as long as they are within a threshold.
Tool Design Challenge
As part of the competition, the participating teams need to design their own grasping tool that can be coupled to the flange of the physical Franka robot. The instructions for the tool design challenge are listed below,
Simple and reliable tool design is encouraged.
The teams may use (but are not limited to) the following open-source dVRK tool adaptor.
The teams are also encouraged to design their own tool that can be coupled to the flange of the physical Franka robot, and execute the actions of pick-and-place.
The flange size of the Franka Research 3 robot can be found on their website, as well as comprehensive details about the robot, including CAD models.
Performance Metrics
Task Performance: Number of pegs successfully transferred to target posts.
Force Feedback Quality: Mean and standard deviation of rendered force feedback.
RCM Compliance: Number of violations of the remote center of motion (RCM) constraint (large violations may result in noticeable box movement).
Failure Conditions
A trial is considered failed if any of the following occurs:
Box displacement exceeds 20 mm (e.g., due to RCM violations).
The peg-transfer platform moves beyond a specified range due to tool-platform collisions.
Significant haptic device vibration persists for more than 3 seconds.
Robot motion is inconsistent with haptic device input (e.g., due to improper mapping).
Other conditions, e.g., unexpected fast movement of the robots.
In case of a failed trial, the team may redo the trial as long as it is within the specified total competition time period.
Final Score Composition
10%: Simulation & Experimental checkpoint #1 (accuracy, ease of setup, reproducibility, etc.).
10%: Simulation & Experimental checkpoint #2 (accuracy, ease of setup, reproducibility, etc.).
80%: On-site competition performance.
Submission Requirements
(1) Simulation & Experimental checkpoint #1 Submission
Recorded demo video showing simulation and/or experimental performance.
Presentation (≤ 6 slides including title) demonstrating teleoperation accuracy, RCM performance, and haptic rendering.
(2) Simulation & Experimental checkpoint #2 Submission
Recorded demo video showing simulation and/or experimental performance.
Presentation (≤ 6 slides including title) demonstrating teleoperation accuracy, RCM performance, and haptic rendering.
Note: Solutions that are easy to set up, user-friendly, reproducible, and generalizable will receive additional consideration in scoring. The simulation and experimental components may progress at different rates.
The final competition will be conducted on-site.
Each team will have 30 minutes of familiarization time before the competition.
Each team will have 30 minutes total competition time.
- A 3-minute task timer will be set for an attempt/trial.
- Teams may repeat attempts/trials within their session, but only the final attempt/trial will be scored.
The robot needs to be reset to its home position before each attempt/trial.
Real-time data streams during the competition may need to be logged and stored in CSV format.
April 9, 2026: Challenge initiated.
April 27, 2026: Team registration open
May 20, 2026: Team formation and registration deadline (Extended to June 1)
June 1, 2026: Team formation and registration deadline
June 20, 2026: Simulation & Experimental checkpoint #1 submission deadline
July 15, 2026: Simulation & Experimental checkpoint #2 submission deadline
August 1, 2026*: Competition preparation day. (BioRob Day 1)
August 2, 2026*: On-site Competition (BioRob Day 2)
August 3, 2026*: Organizing committee meeting (BioRob Day 3)
August 4, 2026*: Announcement of the winning team (BioRob Day 4)
September 10, 2026: The winning team has the opportunity to submit and release their code as open source
(*Dates aligned with BioRob conference schedule.)
The competition will include two progress checkpoints prior to the on-site final.
Simulation & Experimental checkpoint #1: 10% of final score
Simulation & Experimental checkpoint #2: 10% of final score
Teams must submit required materials at each checkpoint to accumulate scores toward the final competition.
Email: ali.nazari@sickkids.ca
Email: majid.roshanfar@sickkids.ca
Email: yafei.ou@ualberta.ca
Would you like to be a sponsor? Please contact us.
Questions?
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions about the competition.