I hypothesize that species richness in the low intertidal will be (lower/higher) than in the high intertidal OR I hypothesize that species richness is not related to intertidal zone.
Scientists set 'null' (no difference or relationship) hypotheses that they attempt to falsify. For example, if you wanted to test whether species richness decreases as you move farther away from the water, your null hypothesis would predict that species richness would not differ significantly with distance. Why? Because you are seeking to falsify this null hypothesis. The hypothesis you are testing to be supported is called the 'alternate' hypothesis, and in this case predicts that species richness will be higher in the low intertidal vs. the high intertidal. You would then assess species richness and if it was indeed higher in the low intertidal, you would reject the null hypothesis and find support for the alternate hypothesis.
The root "eco" derives from 'oikos,' the Greek word for 'home.' Ecology is a branch of biology where scientists study the living organisms (biota) in a particular area (an ecosystem) and how they interact with each other and with the physical world (abiota) around them.
The intertidal zone is the area between the mean low tide and mean high tide, and represents the transition from fully terrestrial to fully marine conditions. By contrast, the subtidal zone is the area that is always submerged. The intertidal zone will be exposed during low tide.
Intertidal zone substrates can be rocky or soft bottom. Some organisms (epifauna) live on the surface, like mud snails on soft bottoms, or barnacles on hard rock substrates. Other organisms (infauna) live in the substrate, such as clams and worms that burrow in soft sediment.
Due to the exposure to air, organisms face a variety of challenges, including:
Zonation in the intertidal is due to varying degrees of exposure.
The upper (or high) intertidal is the most exposed. The lower intertidal is least exposed.
There is typically more competition in the lower intertidal because it is the least extreme of the zones.
The lower intertidal tends to have more species for the same reason.
Species richness is the number of different species (or higher-order taxa) that are documented at a particular site. It is important to consider species richness when monitoring ecosystems, because healthy ecosystems generally support more species compared with those that are disrupted (often by human activities).
In this lab, you will calculate species richness simply by counting the number of species in the sampling area.
Quadrats are square frames with an internal grid that are used for sampling the distribution of plants and animals in a particular area. Salt marshes are often sampled using quadrats that are placed at intervals along a transect.
Because you are interested in evaluating species richness across multiple zones (upper, middle and lower) you are going to run a transect tape (meter tape) perpendicular to the water line, from the water's edge up through the extent of the upper intertidal zone.
In your lab notebook, you will sketch and label a simple image of the sampling and surrounding area. Include the following information:
Your main goals are to determine how many different species are present in each quadrat you place along your transect, and to identify each species using iNaturalist.
It is also possible to estimate percent cover of each species, by estimating how many of the 25 units in the quadrat are occupied by each species (each unit equals 4% of a square meter). This would give you an estimate of species evenness in your sampling area.
Collecting Data:
*Note: In the sandy habitat most organisms will be submerged within the sediment matrix, so you will have to dig. Look for tell-tale siphon holes and worm tubes projecting from the sediment surface.
You may choose to perform a diversity survey for your capstone project, building on the techniques you used today. In lab 5 (meiofaunal diversity) you learned how to measure diversity using Simpson's Diversity Index. This equation uses both species richness and species evenness to estimate overall biodiversity, and may be used to perform a more robust assessment of intertidal diversity. You may choose to evaluate plant diversity, animal diversity, or both. If you are interested in assessing either animal diversity or algal diversity, you should consider transects that run parallel to the water, rather than perpendicular.