If you want rechargeable over-ear headphones for running that tune in local FM radio, choose YUFFUN F5; if you need a rechargeable sound amplifier for hearing voices more clearly, choose IROGER Hearing Amplifier. For a run, the F5 is the more relevant fit: it is built as over-ear headphones, has a 24-hour stated battery life, and can receive FM broadcasts. The IROGER is designed for sound enhancement, not sports listening.
YUFFUN F5 vs IROGER Hearing Amplifier at a Glance
• YUFFUN F5 strength: Over-ear FM headphones with a rechargeable battery rated for up to 24 hours of use. Trade-off: They are centered on radio listening, and the supplied details do not specify water resistance.
• Choose the F5 if you want over-ear radio headphones for jogging and value a foldable design, FM reception, and an auxiliary connection.
• Choose the IROGER if your priority is amplifying nearby speech with simple volume control and long battery life, rather than listening to music on a run.
The YUFFUN F5 is the clearer match for someone searching for rechargeable over-ear headphones for running. It is an over-ear FM radio headset, with a stated reception range of 50–108 MHz covering the US local FM band. That makes its use case more specific than a typical music-only headset: you can tune in to local radio, including talk, weather, news, and sports commentary. For a jogger who likes live broadcasts or local updates, that radio-first design may be more appealing than relying only on stored or streamed audio.
The listed battery life is 24 hours, with a two-hour charging time and USB-C charging. Its foldable design and stated weight of 5.7 ounces also speak to portability: it can be folded for carrying in a backpack, and its weight is modest for an over-ear design. The product information also lists a 3.5 mm jack and auxiliary connectivity, so it can be used as a wired headset with compatible equipment. Button controls and sound isolation round out the feature set.
There are limits to what the provided specifications establish. They do not state that the F5 is water-resistant, nor do they give a sweat-protection rating. That matters for outdoor exercise, where rain or heavy sweating can be a concern. These are radio headphones, not described as open-ear or noise-cancelling running headphones; their listed noise control is sound isolation. If you need a headset with a stated waterproof rating or want to stay more aware of surrounding sounds, the information here does not confirm that the F5 meets those needs.
Who should skip it: Skip the F5 if a verified water-resistance rating, open-ear listening, or a dedicated noise-cancelling feature is essential to your run.
The IROGER Hearing Amplifier serves a different purpose. It is a personal sound amplifier intended to enhance sound, with auto gain control that adjusts amplification levels in real time. Its directional microphone is described as focusing on voices in front while reducing surrounding distractions. In everyday situations such as listening to someone speak across a table, that speech-focused design is more relevant than radio reception or running-oriented entertainment.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
The controls are deliberately simple: one knob turns the device on or off and adjusts volume. The listed maximum sound gain is 65 dB. Its stated battery life is up to 120 hours, and a full charge takes one hour. Those figures suggest a device suited to frequent everyday use without needing to recharge after every outing. It is also described as compact and portable, and its listed weight is 4.8 ounces.
That distinction is important for a shopper comparing it with running headphones. The IROGER’s microphone and amplification features are built around hearing nearby sound, especially voices; the provided information does not list FM reception, a 3.5 mm connection, or a water-resistance rating. It also lists “none” for noise control, so its directional microphone should not be confused with active noise cancellation. The device’s long battery life is useful, but it does not make it a substitute for over-ear headphones designed to play radio or music.
Who should skip it: Skip the IROGER if you want over-ear headphones for music or FM broadcasts while running, rather than a device for sound amplification.
• Best fit for running with FM radio → YUFFUN F5. It is explicitly an over-ear FM headset, with a listed reception range of 50–108 MHz.
• Best for amplifying nearby voices → IROGER Hearing Amplifier. Auto gain control and a directional microphone are aimed at speech-focused sound enhancement.
• Best stated battery life → IROGER. Its listed use time is up to 120 hours, compared with 24 hours for the F5.
• Best match for a foldable over-ear design → YUFFUN F5. The F5 is described as foldable and weighs 5.7 ounces.
• Simpler control style → IROGER. Its one-knob design handles power and volume, while the F5 uses button controls.
• Best for radio broadcasts and sports commentary → YUFFUN F5. Its FM range is specified, and its described uses include local radio and live sports broadcasts.
• Best for wired listening through an auxiliary connection → YUFFUN F5. The product details list a 3.5 mm jack and auxiliary connectivity.
• Best for someone who wants noise-cancelling running headphones → Neither is clearly established by the listed details. The F5 lists sound isolation; the IROGER lists no noise control, though its microphone is directional.
The phrase “best open ear headphones for running” points toward a different design question than this comparison answers. Neither product is identified as open-ear. Likewise, shoppers looking for the “best noise cancelling headphones for running” should note that the F5’s sound isolation is not listed as noise cancellation, and the IROGER’s microphone feature is not a headphone noise-cancelling system.
Before choosing either device for exercise, think about what you need to hear. The F5 is the more direct option if your run is built around listening to local FM radio. Its over-ear fit and sound isolation may suit someone who wants to focus on a broadcast, but the available details do not say how much outside sound remains audible. If awareness of traffic, other people, or trail activity is important, do not assume that an over-ear, sound-isolating design will provide the same awareness as open-ear headphones.
Water protection is another point to check against your own routine. Neither set of product details provides an IP rating or confirms water resistance. So a shopper seeking an “ipx7 waterproof headset for running” should not treat either of these as meeting that specification based on the information provided. The same caution applies to sweat: no sweat-resistance claim is listed for either product.
Also keep the different purposes in view. The F5 is the pick for FM radio listening and can connect through an auxiliary jack. The IROGER is a personal sound amplifier with features aimed at raising and clarifying sound, particularly voices in front of the microphone. Its longer battery life and faster stated charge time are meaningful conveniences, but they do not change its intended role. If you are shopping primarily for a running headset, the deciding question is whether radio listening matters more than a speech-amplification function.
In my opinion, I would choose the YUFFUN F5 for running because it is the only one of these two products described as over-ear FM radio headphones. Its 24-hour stated battery life, foldable design, and radio reception make it the more relevant match for a runner who wants local broadcasts. I would not treat it as waterproof or noise-cancelling based on the listed details. The IROGER is the more sensible choice for speech amplification, but that is a different job.
The provided details do not give an IP rating or state that either product is water-resistant. If a specific waterproof rating is essential, neither can be confirmed as meeting that requirement from the available information.
The IROGER is listed for up to 120 hours of use per charge, while the YUFFUN F5 is listed for 24 hours. Their purposes differ, so battery life alone does not make the IROGER the better running headphone.
No noise-control feature is listed for the IROGER. It does have a directional microphone intended to focus on voices from in front and reduce surrounding distractions, which is not the same as headphone noise cancellation.
The YUFFUN F5 is the relevant option because its specifications list FM reception from 50–108 MHz. The IROGER is described as a sound amplifier, and FM reception is not listed for it.
• Antlion Audio ModMic Uni 2+ vs Fosi Audio C3: PC Gaming
• FIFINE H6W vs Yealink UH34: USB Wired Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.