Common defenses used by Rancho Santa Fe criminal defense attorney against theft charges

Criminal defense attorneys employ a variety of strategies when defending individuals facing theft charges. The complexity of theft cases necessitates a nuanced approach that takes into account the specific circumstances surrounding the alleged offense. 

Here, we explore some common defenses used by Rancho Santa Fe criminal defense attorney to challenge theft charges.

Lack of intent: One fundamental element of theft charges is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of their property. Defense attorneys often argue that their client did not have the requisite intent, perhaps claiming the accused believed they had permission to take the property or that it was a misunderstanding.

Mistaken identity: In cases where the identification of the alleged thief is a crucial factor, the defense may argue mistaken identity. This defense asserts that the prosecution has misidentified the accused, and an innocent person is being wrongly accused of the theft.

Ownership dispute: Some theft cases involve property disputes, where the defense argues that the accused genuinely believed they had a right to the property or that they were the rightful owner. This defense is particularly relevant in situations where ownership is unclear or in cases involving joint property.

Duress or coercion: The Rancho Santa Fe criminal defense attorney may assert that the accused committed the theft under duress or coercion, meaning they were forced to commit the crime against their will. This defense is applicable in situations where the accused faced threats or harm if they did not engage in the alleged criminal activity.

Lack of evidence: A straightforward defense strategy involves challenging the prosecution's evidence. If there is insufficient evidence to prove the elements of the theft beyond a reasonable doubt, the defense may argue for a lack of evidence and request dismissal of the charges.

Entrapment: Rancho Santa Fe criminal defense attorney may claim that law enforcement induced or coerced their client into committing the theft. If the accused can show that they would not have committed the crime without the undue influence of law enforcement, they may have a valid entrapment defense.

Good faith belief: If the accused genuinely believed they had a legal right to the property, their defense may center around a good faith belief. This defense relies on demonstrating that the accused acted with an honest and reasonable belief in their entitlement to the property.

Rancho Santa Fe criminal defense attorney employs a range of defenses against theft charges, tailoring their strategies to the specific circumstances of each case. These defenses aim to cast doubt on the prosecution's case, challenge the evidence presented, and ultimately secure the best possible outcome for the accused.

When you are charged in a crime, the only thing that matters is hiring a reliable and experienced criminal defence lawyer for protecting your freedom. Vikas Bajaj is the criminal lawyer that specializes in defending celebrities and widely featured in national and local news.