Authored By: Weedium Gualguainis and Justin August Wellington
Original Source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gZPN6FocPlffq3Af9XrU20UucyPbtvAcifVvBA3pdqk/edit
Those looking for a definition of avaritionism need to pick one real quick, as is the world of avaritionism, of pure chaotic anarchy. The bloody hellfire of pure selfishness runs throughout the lands as those strong enough will see what comes after death, as in, they survive.
Those who ponder too long after their rests will be tossed away like paper in the wind, that, unlike the stronger ones, will be flown into the bin, unlike the perpetual hedonic circle of pure thrills of chasing.
If we are to look at pure absolute chaos of avaritionism, we may see there is a lack of parasitic relation to the weak, this to me is folly. The weak have a lot of benefit to take out selfishly. As Thomas Hobbes pointed out so smartly in the beginning of Leviathan the state is artificial, to an anarcho-avaritionist, this is pure kraterocracy, which stills keeps the weak, even if subjugated, an orthodox avaritionist would be disgusted with any keeping of the weak, as that is the point of social Darwinism, purge the weak. To me it is off great benefit for the subjugation of the weak, which brings us to.
What I mean by parasitic relations is in a Darwinian sense, weak parasitic relations are the use of weakness for a parasitic benefit for the strong, strong parasitic relations are the use of brutal chaotic strength for their own benefit.
In the subjugated areas of the egoligarchs, the weak are used as consumer-customers for the monetary benefit of them, of course there will be purging, we need social competition, but we need to stabilise that competition by keeping a bit, maybe think of it in a cultural view, keep the old and let some of the new.
In the Bible of Avarice (a key piece of literature if you are searching for anarcho-avaritionism), egoism is viewed as a type of bastardized avaritionism or pussy avaritionism, something of which made me question my own ideological status as an avaritionist. But to me, post-avaritionism can be egoistic, at least as defined in it, especially in the subjucated areas.
I don’t know whether this view is considered “posery” or “blasphemy”, but to me, egoism in the weak may be a good thing, opening up those selfish desires that profitters can take advantage of, corporations can analyse people socially to increase their profitability. Along with increasing egoism it may strengthen them, a “glow up fr fr” in meme terms.
Ownership is the power to realization of self-actualization of oneself and also the possession of something for yourself. Ownership is what you possess, a fundamental belief in any avaritionist circle is the belief is “owning property that you can protect”, in this statement, property is not a legal gift, but something that you should be able to possess and keep, if you fail, than that is your failure strength-wise.