If you want closed-back, over-ear headphones for focused computer listening, choose AUDIX A152; if you need a compact planar in-ear monitor with detailed sound and 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm plug options, choose Hidizs MP145.
Neither is a USB-C charging headset for computer: both are wired, and the listed connections are analog audio plugs.
AUDIX A152 vs Hidizs MP145 at a Glance
• AUDIX A152 strength: Closed-back, over-ear design with padded earcups, a padded headband, and reduced outside sound. Trade-off: It is a wired, over-ear model rather than a compact in-ear option.
• Hidizs MP145 strength: A 14.5 mm planar magnetic driver and 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm plug options. Trade-off: Its in-ear fit may not suit listeners who dislike earbuds.
• A152 connectivity: Wired, with a 3.5 mm jack; the package includes detachable cables and a 3.5 mm-to-1/4-inch adapter.
• MP145 connectivity: Wired, with 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plug choices described in its product information.
• Choose the A152 if you want padded over-ear headphones for a computer desk, monitoring, or longer listening sessions.
• Choose the MP145 if you prefer in-ear monitors and want a compact wired option with planar-driver design.
The AUDIX A152 is a dynamic, closed-back circumaural headphone built around 50 mm drivers. Its over-ear cushions and padded headband are the clearest practical distinction from the MP145. They cover the ears rather than sitting inside them, and the closed design is intended to reduce outside sound and limit sound bleed into microphones. That makes the A152 a sensible candidate for computer listening in a shared room or for monitoring while working with a microphone.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-22 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
I’d point computer users toward the A152 if they value over-ear cushioning, a closed design, and a choice of cable lengths. It is also a reasonable fit for someone who wants one-ear monitoring as part of their workflow. Skip it if you specifically want in-ear monitors, a 4.4 mm connection, or a USB-C charging headset. The A152 is wired and uses a 3.5 mm headphone connection.
The Hidizs MP145 is an in-ear monitor with a 14.5 mm planar magnetic driver. Its frequency range is listed as 20 Hz to 40 kHz. For someone who likes the direct, compact form of an IEM, the planar design and the supplied 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plug options are its main points of distinction. The product information also lists passive noise cancellation, so its in-ear format differs from the A152’s padded, closed-back earcups.
The MP145’s description highlights controlled bass, a transparent midrange, and extended treble. Treat those as the product’s intended sound profile, not a guarantee that every listener will prefer it. Fit is central with an in-ear model: its supplied eartips are meant to help create a comfortable, secure seal, but ear shape and personal comfort vary. The product information gives no battery specification, and this is a wired IEM rather than a rechargeable headset.
I’d consider the MP145 if I wanted a small wired listening option and preferred in-ear monitors over a full-size headband. It could suit a computer setup with compatible audio connections, particularly if 4.4 mm is useful in that system. Skip it if you dislike having eartips in your ears or want the broad, cushioned feel of over-ear headphones. It is not a bone-conduction model, either.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for a computer desk with over-ear cushioning → AUDIX A152. Its circumaural design uses padded earcups and a padded headband.
• Best for an in-ear listening setup → Hidizs MP145. It is an IEM built around a planar magnetic driver.
• Best if you need a 4.4 mm plug option → Hidizs MP145. The listed plug choices include 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm.
• Best for one-ear monitoring → AUDIX A152. Its earcups swivel 90 degrees for that use.
• Best for choosing between two included cable lengths → AUDIX A152. The package lists detachable 3 m and 1.8 m cables, along with a 1/4-inch adapter.
• Best if you prefer a compact wired form → Hidizs MP145. Its in-ear design avoids the over-ear cups and headband of the A152.
• Best for someone searching for USB-C charging headphones → Neither. Both are wired, and neither product sheet lists USB-C charging.
The terms people use when shopping can point to the wrong category. A search for “best comfortable bone conduction headphones for computer” does not describe either model: the A152 is over-ear, and the MP145 is an in-ear monitor. Likewise, someone looking for “best hifi stereo sleep headphones for computer” should not assume either is designed for sleep. The sheets describe conventional wired listening headphones, not bone-conduction or sleep-specific designs.
I’d choose the AUDIX A152 for a computer setup. Its over-ear padding, closed-back design, detachable cable options, and one-ear monitoring swivel make it the more practical fit for desk listening and microphone work.
I’d pick the Hidizs MP145 instead if I already knew I preferred in-ear monitors and wanted its planar design or 4.4 mm plug option. For my computer use, though, the A152’s over-ear format is the deciding advantage.
FAQ
No. Both are listed as wired products. The A152 uses a 3.5 mm connection, while the MP145’s product information lists a 3.5 mm jack and its description includes 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plug options.
Neither is described as a USB-C charging headset. Both are wired, and their listed audio connections are 3.5 mm, with the MP145 also described with a 4.4 mm option. Check the computer’s audio output and any required adapter before choosing.
The A152’s closed-back, over-ear construction is designed to reduce outside sound and limit microphone bleed. The MP145 lists passive noise cancellation, but its in-ear fit is a different approach. Neither product sheet provides a numerical noise-reduction measurement.
• our JVC Clip Style Headphone vs MUSICOZY 3D pick
• SteelSeries Siberia v2 vs SAMDI Wood Headphone Stand
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.