Audio Technica ATH-EQ300M vs Bayhanc Bone Conduction Headphones at a Glance
• Audio Technica ATH-EQ300M: lightweight 20-gram design and a wired 1.2-meter cord; its cord means it is not a wireless option.
• Bayhanc Bone Conduction Headphones: open-ear design, Bluetooth 5.4, and up to 10 hours of playback; its controls and listening format differ from conventional ear-fit headphones.
• Audio Technica is for: listeners who want a simple, lightweight wired pair with a 3.5 mm jack.
• Bayhanc is for: people who want wireless listening while keeping their ear canals open to surrounding sounds.
The ATH-EQ300M is the simpler choice. It weighs 20 grams, has an ultra-thin housing, and connects through a 1.2-meter cord with a 3.5 mm jack. Its listed audio details include a dynamic driver, 20-ohm impedance, and a 16–24,000 Hz frequency range. That gives buyers concrete reasons to consider it when they want a light, wired ear-fit design rather than Bluetooth features.
For a workout, the appeal is straightforward: no wireless battery or pairing is involved, and the cord is long enough to connect a compatible device while you move. The trade-off is that a cord can be less convenient than a wireless frame during exercise. The product information lists sound isolation, but it does not give a noise-canceling feature, a water-resistance claim, or a battery specification. I would not choose it on the assumption that it blocks gym noise or is made for sweaty conditions.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-21 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
Bayhanc takes a different approach: its wraparound frame rests outside the ear canals, using bone-conduction drivers rather than placing ear tips inside the ears. The product is listed at 28 grams and is designed to keep the ear canals open while listening. That open-ear format is its clearest distinction from the Audio Technica. It may suit a runner, walker, or cyclist who wants music or spoken directions without fully covering the ears.
It connects over Bluetooth 5.4, has a listed range of up to 33 feet, and includes a built-in microphone for hands-free calls. Playback is listed at up to 10 hours, with USB-C charging and a two-hour charge time. The maker describes it as sweat-resistant and suitable for light rain, but that is not the same as a stated waterproof rating. Its 16 mm drivers are described as delivering clear vocals and balanced everyday sound.
Choose Bayhanc if you want wireless convenience, open ears, and a frame intended to stay in place during movement. Keep in mind that the listed noise control is “None,” so this is not a noise-canceling design. Open ears can help you hear surrounding sounds, but they also mean your music is not isolated from your environment. If you want a conventional ear-fit design or a wired connection, the ATH-EQ300M is the more relevant option.
• Best fit for a wireless workout setup → Bayhanc. It uses Bluetooth 5.4 and has no headphone jack, so there is no listening cable to manage.
• Best for avoiding a battery charge → Audio Technica. Its wired design does not list a battery or playback limit; you will need a compatible 3.5 mm connection.
• Best for keeping ear canals open → Bayhanc. Its open-ear bone-conduction format leaves the canals uncovered while you listen.
• Best for a stated lightweight figure → Audio Technica. It weighs 20 grams, compared with Bayhanc’s listed 28 grams.
• Best for hands-free calls → Bayhanc. It has a built-in microphone; no microphone is specified for the Audio Technica.
• Best when you want sound isolation listed → Audio Technica. Its noise-control field says sound isolation, while Bayhanc’s says none. Neither listing establishes active noise cancellation.
• Best for workouts with some exposure to sweat or light rain → Bayhanc. It is described as sweat-resistant and able to handle light rain, though no waterproof rating is provided.
• Best for a simple wired listening routine → Audio Technica. Its 1.2-meter cord and 3.5 mm jack are the defining practical features.
Some shoppers may search for the “best hifi stereo clip on earbuds for workout,” but the product details here do not establish a hi-fi certification or a stereo comparison. The ATH-EQ300M is the more relevant pick if the priority is its light, wired ear-fit design. Likewise, someone looking for the “best hi res bone conduction headphones for workout” should not infer high-resolution audio from Bayhanc’s bone-conduction format or 16 mm driver size; those details are not a hi-res claim.
Neither model is described as a noise-canceling sports headphone. If “best noise canceling sports earbuds for workout” is your goal, these specifications do not support calling either one noise-canceling. The Audio Technica lists sound isolation, while Bayhanc lists no noise control. That distinction matters in a loud gym or anywhere you want to reduce surrounding sound: open-ear listening is designed around awareness, not blocking noise.
In my opinion, I would choose the Bayhanc for a workout if I wanted wireless movement and open ears. Its Bluetooth connection, up-to-10-hour playback, built-in microphone, and sweat-resistant design make it the more exercise-oriented feature set. I would choose the Audio Technica instead for a lighter, wired setup without a battery to manage. For my workout pick, Bayhanc is the more practical match when awareness and cable-free use matter most.
Bayhanc is the more workout-focused option if you want wireless use, an open-ear fit, and a sweat-resistant design. The Audio Technica weighs less and avoids battery charging, but it has a cord and no stated sweat-resistance feature.
No noise control is listed for Bayhanc. Its open-ear design leaves the ear canals uncovered, so it is intended to let surrounding sounds remain audible rather than cancel them.
Does the Audio Technica ATH-EQ300M have Bluetooth?
The product details identify a 3.5 mm jack and a 1.2-meter cord for wired listening. Although Bluetooth appears in a connectivity field, the provided specifications do not establish this model as a wireless pair, so buyers should not count on Bluetooth use.
Bayhanc has a built-in microphone and up to 10 hours of playback, with a listed two-hour charging time. The Audio Technica’s supplied specifications do not list a microphone or battery, so it is the clearer choice only if you prefer a wired setup rather than those wireless features.
• how jlab compares to sony headphones
• Zeroffi 3.5mm vs Kosker Headset Stand 4
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.