If you want detailed, balanced monitoring and a choice of tip materials for big ears, choose Audio-Technica ATH-E70; if you need a bass-forward sound and stated noise isolation for everyday listening, choose Shure SE215. For large ears, neither model guarantees a fit based on ear size alone, but both use over-ear cable routing and include multiple sleeve options to help you find a secure seal.
• Audio-Technica ATH-E70 strength: Three balanced armature drivers and a stated 20 Hz–19,000 Hz range suit precise monitoring; trade-off: its emphasis on accuracy may be less appealing if you want a bass-forward presentation.
• Shure SE215 strength: A single dynamic driver is described as delivering deep bass, and its sound-isolating design is specified to block up to 37 dB of ambient noise; trade-off: it uses one driver rather than the E70’s three.
• Fit options: Both route their cables over the ears. The E70 includes silicone tips in XS, S, M, and L plus medium Comply foam tips; the SE215 includes flex and foam sleeves in S, M, and L.
• Connection and upkeep: Both have detachable cables. The E70 has A2DC connectors and a 6.3 mm adapter in the box; the SE215 uses a rotating, lock-snap MMCX connector.
• Who should choose the E70: Listeners focused on accurate monitoring, studio mixing, or a selection of silicone and foam tips.
• Who should choose the SE215: Listeners who want deep bass, a stated noise-isolation figure, and a straightforward wired earphone for music or stage monitoring.
The ATH-E70 is the more monitoring-focused choice. Its three balanced armature drivers are designed to provide accurate, extended response across a 20 Hz–19,000 Hz range. Audio-Technica describes it as suitable for stage monitoring and studio mixing, where hearing detail across the frequency range matters more than getting a deliberately bass-heavy sound.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-09 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
I’d skip the E70 if your main priority is a pronounced bass character for casual listening. Its stated strengths are accuracy and monitoring, not an expressly bass-enhanced tuning. It is also wired, so it is not the right match for someone seeking a wireless setup. The detachable 1.6 m cable and included 6.3 mm adapter make more sense for a listening chain or monitoring setup that can use a wired connection.
The SE215 takes a different approach to sound. It uses a single dynamic MicroDriver and is described as producing clear highs with rich, deep bass. Its listed frequency range is 20 Hz–20,000 Hz. If your listening leans toward bass-led music, or you want an in-ear monitor that can move between personal listening and stage use, that tuning description may be the more appealing starting point.
Shure specifies that the SE215’s sound-isolating design blocks up to 37 dB of ambient noise. It also has an over-ear wireform cable intended to stay secure during movement, plus a detachable MMCX cable with a rotating connection and a lock-snap mechanism. Three sizes of both flex and foam sleeves are included. Those options may help with fit, though a large ear does not automatically mean that a larger sleeve will feel more comfortable: the seal and the shape of the ear canal matter too.
The SE215 may be the better fit if you want deep bass and a stated noise-blocking figure without stepping into a three-driver monitoring design. I would look elsewhere if your main goal is the E70’s stated focus on accurate, detailed monitoring, or if a 3.5 mm wired connection does not suit your equipment. The package includes a carrying case, and its replaceable cable is a practical feature for a set intended for regular use.
• Best for detailed studio or stage monitoring → Audio-Technica ATH-E70. Its three balanced armature drivers and stated accurate, extended response are the clearest match for balancing a mix.
• Best for a bass-forward listening preference → Shure SE215. Shure specifically describes its single dynamic driver as producing deep bass alongside clear highs.
• Best if you want a stated noise-isolation figure → Shure SE215. Its design is specified to block up to 37 dB of ambient noise. The E70 is also designed for isolation, but its sheet gives no comparable numeric figure.
• Best selection of silicone tip sizes → Audio-Technica ATH-E70. It includes XS, S, M, and L silicone tips, as well as medium Comply foam tips.
• Best if you want both foam and flex sleeves in several sizes → Shure SE215. It includes S, M, and L sizes in both materials.
• Best for a 6.3 mm connection option in the box → Audio-Technica ATH-E70. It includes a 6.3 mm plug-on adapter along with its detachable cable.
• Best for a rotating MMCX cable connection → Shure SE215. Its detachable cable uses an MMCX connector with 360-degree rotation and a lock-snap mechanism.
• Best fit for big ears depends on tip seal, not the label → compare both. Both have over-ear cable routing and multiple sleeve options, but the included sizes and materials differ. I’d choose by which set gives you a comfortable seal.
My Verdict
I’d choose the Audio-Technica ATH-E70 for monitoring and mixing because its three-driver design and accuracy-focused description better match those tasks. Its four silicone tip sizes and included foam tips also give me a practical range to consider for big ears. If deep bass and a stated noise-isolation figure matter more, I’d choose the Shure SE215 instead.
That depends on what you want to hear. The ATH-E70 is described around accurate, detailed monitoring, while the SE215 is described as having clear highs and deep bass.
Neither product sheet guarantees a fit for big ears. Both route the cable over the ear and include multiple sleeve options; the E70 has four silicone tip sizes plus medium foam tips, while the SE215 includes S, M, and L flex and foam sleeves.
Shure states that the SE215 blocks up to 37 dB of ambient noise. The ATH-E70 is designed for sound isolation, but no numeric noise-blocking figure is provided for it, so the two specifications cannot be directly compared.
Both are wired earphones with detachable cables. The ATH-E70 includes a 6.3 mm adapter, while the SE215 uses an MMCX cable connection; neither is described here as a wireless listening option.
• erjigo KZ ZSN Pro vs Matast Earbuds
• Bluedio H Turbine vs Perytong Sleeping Headphones
• BULYPAZY Sleeping Headphones vs Gaiam Cargo Yoga Mat
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.