If you want a closed-back design with planar magnetic drivers and added sound isolation, choose Audeze LCD-XC Over Ear; if you need an open-back headphone for a more spacious listening presentation, choose Behringer Alpha Open-Back Hi-Fi. For small ears, neither spec sheet confirms a compact fit, so the more useful choice is the design that suits your listening space and priorities.
Audeze LCD-XC Over Ear vs Behringer Alpha Open-Back Hi-Fi at a Glance
• Behringer Alpha Open-Back Hi-Fi: Open-back design, a detachable two-sided cable, and a self-adjusting headband make it a flexible listening option; sound can escape through the open earcups.
• Audeze’s 10 Hz–50 kHz frequency range is broader on paper; Behringer lists a 10 Hz–28 kHz range and 50 mm dynamic drivers.
• Audeze includes a 1.9 m cable with a 4-pin XLR connection and a 6.3 mm adapter; Behringer includes a cable up to 3 m, plus 3.5 mm and 6.3 mm connections.
• Choose Audeze for listening where isolation matters; choose Behringer for open, room-based listening and practice.
The LCD-XC is the more isolation-focused pick. It has a closed-back, around-ear design, which is a practical advantage when you want to keep more surrounding sound out of your listening experience. That makes it a better fit than an open-back model for a shared room, a quiet recording space where monitoring spill matters, or focused listening when nearby activity could be distracting. The listed noise control is sound isolation, not active noise cancellation.
Its 100 mm planar magnetic drivers, neodymium N50 magnets, and 10 Hz–50 kHz frequency range set it apart from the Behringer’s 50 mm dynamic-driver design on the listed specifications. Audeze describes the sound as neutral and transparent, and the product information points to recording, mixing, and critical listening as natural use cases. The low listed impedance of 20 ohms also suggests it is designed to work with a range of devices that have a headphone output, though it remains a wired headphone.
For fit, the suspension headband is intended to distribute weight, while the cushioned earpads provide support around the ears. The product is listed at 4 pounds, so shoppers who are sensitive to heavier headphones should treat that as a key consideration rather than assuming the headband will make the weight disappear. No ear-opening dimensions are provided, so I would not assume it is a guaranteed match for small ears. Skip it if you need wireless listening, confirmed compact ear openings, or an open-back presentation.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-18 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
The Behringer Alpha takes the opposite approach. Its open-back construction is designed to give listening a more spacious, natural presentation, which can suit home listening, practicing, composing, and critical listening in a quiet room. It is also a sensible format when you want less of the sealed-in character associated with closed-back headphones. The trade-off is straightforward: an open design does not provide the same sound isolation as the Audeze, and sound can travel in and out through the earcups.
Behringer lists 50 mm neodymium dynamic drivers and a 10 Hz–28 kHz frequency range. Its self-adjusting headband and ultra-soft ear cushions are intended to make extended listening more comfortable, while the detachable, two-sided cable reaches up to 3 m. That longer cable can be convenient when your listening setup is not right beside you. The included connection options are 3.5 mm and 6.3 mm, which makes the wired setup easy to match with a range of compatible headphone outputs.
The product weighs 1.7 pounds according to its item details, less than the listed weight of the Audeze. That is a concrete distinction for shoppers who prefer a lighter headphone, though weight alone cannot establish how a particular headband or earcup will fit. The sheet gives no ear-opening measurements, and the circular over-ear shape does not guarantee comfort for small ears. Skip it if you need strong isolation, a closed-back design, or quiet listening around people who may be disturbed by escaping sound.
• Best for open-back listening → Behringer Alpha Open-Back Hi-Fi. The open earcups are designed for a more spacious listening presentation, but they are a poor match when sound needs to stay contained.
• Best for the broader listed frequency range → Audeze LCD-XC Over Ear. It is specified at 10 Hz–50 kHz, compared with Behringer’s 10 Hz–28 kHz. Those figures describe different stated ranges; they do not, by themselves, guarantee that one will sound better to every listener.
• Best for a longer included cable → Behringer Alpha Open-Back Hi-Fi. Its detachable cable reaches up to 3 m, while the Audeze cable is listed at 1.9 m.
• Best for a planar magnetic design → Audeze LCD-XC Over Ear. Its 100 mm planar magnetic drivers are a central part of its design; Behringer uses 50 mm dynamic drivers.
• Best for a lighter listed weight → Behringer Alpha Open-Back Hi-Fi. The product information lists it at 1.7 pounds, compared with 4 pounds for the Audeze. Check whether weight matters to you, but do not treat it as a substitute for a fit assessment.
• Best for small ears → Neither is a sure thing from the available fit details. Neither product sheet gives earcup opening measurements. If that is your deciding concern, look for those measurements or a return policy that lets you assess fit.
• Best for a wired setup with both 3.5 mm and 6.3 mm connections → Behringer Alpha Open-Back Hi-Fi. Audeze includes a 4-pin XLR cable and a 6.3 mm adapter; choose based on the outputs you actually plan to use.
Buying Considerations
Second, think about where the cable will run and what you will plug it into. Audeze’s 1.9 m cable uses a 4-pin XLR connection and comes with a 6.3 mm adapter. Behringer’s detachable two-sided cable can extend up to 3 m and comes with 3.5 mm and 6.3 mm connections. That is a meaningful difference for a desktop, instrument, or audio-interface setup, but both remain wired options.
Finally, do not shop by a broad search phrase alone. Someone looking for multipoint bone conduction headphones for small ears is looking for a very different category: these are over-ear, wired headphones, and neither sheet lists Bluetooth or bone conduction. The phrase bluetooth headphones for small ears also points to a feature neither model provides. For either headphone, confirm that its wired connection, open- or closed-back design, and fit details suit your actual routine before choosing.
I would choose the Audeze LCD-XC Over Ear if I wanted focused listening with a closed-back design, planar magnetic drivers, and the wider listed frequency range. Its weight and wired connection are real compromises, and small-ear fit cannot be confirmed from the available details. For small ears, I would make fit verification a deciding step rather than assume either model will work. I would choose the Behringer instead when a lighter listed weight, open-back presentation, and longer detachable cable matter more.
Its listed noise control is sound isolation, and it has a closed-back design. The product information does not specify active noise cancellation.
It may be a good fit for listening in a shared room when sound leakage is not a concern. Its open-back design does not provide the same isolation as the closed-back Audeze, and sound can escape from the earcups.
Which headphone is lighter?
Neither product sheet provides earcup opening measurements, so there is not enough fit information to declare a clear winner for small ears. Check the fit details before choosing, especially if earcup size is a recurring issue for you.
• Friday 7Care Baby Headphones vs Boodlab Sleep Mask
• APZXTRK Earbuds vs NVXMANIYK Ultra-Mini Sleep Earbuds
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.