Picture by: Sudhisa Patibhanthewa
From a marine biology perspective (e.g. Sheppard 2021), human activities in the ocean, such as wastewater discharge, oil spills, overfishing, and reef destruction, are considered primarily threatening. Nevertheless, such activities should not be regarded solely as destructive. A good counterexample is the artificial reef, i.e. an artificial substrate or human-made structure emplaced in an aquatic environment mainly to improve ecological conditions, restore fish populations, and protect the coastal environment (Vivier et al. 2021).
From a humanities perspective, however, viewing such activities in the age of the Anthropocene can no longer be based on the assumption that humans are the main actants on the planet. Other species should also be considered important in understanding situations in which human and non-human entities are bound together in ongoing interactions (van Dooren et al. 2016).
Picture by: Sudhisa Patibhanthewa
This project aims to apply different approaches to meaning-making (e.g. resemiotization) to analyze interaction within a potential semiotic assemblage (cf. Deleuze & Guattari 1987) resulting from interaction of different species, drawing cases studies from two dive sites in Chumphon. It does not aim to analyze the potential effect of human waste to the marine/reef ecology scientifically. Instead, it aims to analyze the transformation of the meaning resulted from interspecies interaction.
The project mainly asks two question, one empirical and one theoretical, namely:
How do human-made objects, both intentionally and unintentionally introduced into ocean, acquire new meanings through interactions between human and non-human entities?
To what extent can existing concepts such as semiotic landscape, resemiotization, and semiotic assemblage account for these interspecies processes of meaning-making?