Two things I would suggest, make sure your clock settings both hardware and software are solid. Verify that the service that controls fwconsole is behaving properly to start and stop asterisk in a timely fashion and has the correct permissions
Would an fwconsole chown be a good way to ensure proper permissions? What is the best way to test starting and stopping asterisk in a timely manner? Should I just restart it with fwconsole and time it?
Asterisk Iarsi
Download 🔥 https://cinurl.com/2y5z5Q 🔥
lines 1359 and following suggests there might be a problem with your firewall, as soon after it reloads a failure to connect to asterisk ( TCP:5038 on the lo interface usually) is noted which is not resolved by the end of your posted logs.
In the Dashboard - System Overview, it shows me the little triangle and the notice that asterisk has been running for less than 10 minutes. However, asterisk has been running for over 30 minutes without issue. It tells me that asterisk has been only running for 5 minutes 33 seconds whether it has been running for 30 seconds or 30 minutes. Asterisk is in fact running. Under Reports - Asterisk Logfiles it shows me the correct Asterisk uptime.
Hi all, for a short while now I've noticed that straight away after opening a file in InDesign an asterisk appears right next to te name of the file on te tab, indicating the changes to the file haven't been saved yet.
I open an excisting file which I've made with the previous version, like always it opens with an asterisk because it's the first time being opened in a newer version. I give the command and get the window where I can determine where I want the file to be saved, I save the file and the asterisk is gone. I make the changes needed to the file, and off course right after the first change the asterisk shows up again, when I give the command to save the changed file under a new name the window comes up so I can change the name of the file and save it on a new location. So far nothing out of the ordenary. I close the file because I'm done working on it. I don't shut down InDesign, I just close the file.
I was able to get all the data displayed along with the asterisk by using |rex "DATA=(?[^$]+)"| where DATA was the indexed column. Then removed the asterisk with |eval Message=replace(Message, "\*", "")| Thanks to all that replied with ideas to help me resolve this issue i was having.
For **\*** and *, they are actually bolded. It's just that asterisks don't look very different when bolded. (Do an inspect element on them; it does generate tags for it but they aren't visually different)
When I paste text that contains an asterisk, such as the the example below, in either a normal text area, or into a section of text formatted as code, the asterisk disappears. Nothing happens to make me think it treats it as markdown, and clearly this should not happen in code formatted text. It does paste correctly in a code block such as the one below.
Thanks for posting all this information. The specific string and the screenshots help a lot to understand what is happening here. Your example string here has exactly two asterisks within it. Because this character is used within our markdown, it appears this is being interpreted as your desire to italicize the text in between those characters.
How do i increase the file limit for the asterisk daemon on my ubuntu computer? When I login as root and use the ulimit, it says unlimited already. I can't login as asterisk because that user doesn't have shell access, it's just a daemon.
I'm an Instructional Designer who supports faculty using Canvas. In SpeedGrader, when an instructor enters a general comment but doesn't submit it, then navigates to a different student, the comment's text is auto-saved as a draft. When the instructor returns to the first student's submission, this draft status is indicated by a tiny red asterisk to the left of the comment. This is confusing, since it doesn't say "Draft" anywhere. This is also an accessibility issue, since users with color blindness or users with any level of visual impairment may not be able to see the tiny red asterisk. I propose replacing the asterisk with the bold word "DRAFT," which is clearer, more accessible, and more inclusive.
The current indicator of the save but not submitted state (a tiny red asterisk) is too small to be easily noticed and does not indicate what the asterisk means. In order to help limit the amount of confusion and time spent on trying to understand why comments are not visible to students, Instructure should perform at least one of the two following actions: 1) Increase the size of the red asterisk. This would undoubtedly make instructors not overlook the red asterisk and reduce the time spent checking on comment visibility in Speedgrader. 2) Include a small message next to the existing red asterisk that explains what the red asterisk means. While this message is visible in other locations, having it directly adjacent to the red asterisk will not only increase the chance of instructor awareness of the issue, but it will increase the understanding of why comments are not visible to students.
In sum, the modification of this existing feature with the suggestions listed above will only benefit instructors, support staff, and students due to greater awareness of Speedgrader comment visibility and the red asterisk.
This additional alert would be very helpful! We are currently running a weekly report to help catch unposted comments as a way to support faculty because it is very difficult to see the asterisk when you are in there grading. Great suggestion!
Our faculty would love to have the asterisk replaced by 'draft'. It is even more important when you have teaching assistants putting in comments and not submitting as the instructor will not know or be able to confirm if they have submitted. An Asterisk is not a intuitive notifier of feedback not being submitted.
This is a great suggestion. We get many instructors reaching out with questions as to why some students can see comments and others cannot due to not knowing the comment hasn't been submitted. The asterisk is much too small for most people to notice and it usually requires a support ticket to figure out what the asterisk is indicating. I like the idea of a Draft label.
This brings up another very important point. Feedback is extremely important for learning. Our instructors often leave detailed information in the comments section but are frustrated that they cannot go back in and edit a comment that hasn't been submitted. Currently Canvas only allows you to submit the comment or delete it. We would very much like to see an edit option as well.
I know that Unix/Linux has a weird concept of outputting filenames with an asterisk in the end to mean "this is executable". Alright, so I guess that explains that. However, I have been utterly unable to find a single mention anywhere of what it means when the asterisk is in the beginning of the filename.
Also, even if somebody will answer here and tell me why it's sometimes in the beginning instead of the end, I still wonder why you'd confusingly include these asterisks in this "hash format". After all, this is NOT a local file list output, but a file format for verifying file hashes for distributed binaries. Why would you ever include anything but the actual filename in such a context? Just to cause problems when people don't realize that they need to remove those asterisks from both the beginning and the end of the actual filename?
Additionally, feeding one of the following line formats into sha256sum -c causes it to abort, complaining that the file cannot be found - i.e: it's not handling the asterisk prefix/suffix on the filename, and is considering it to be part of the filename.
I keep coming across this and my Google Fu (actually DuckDuckGo Judo) cannot find the answer; what is the significance of a single, lone asterisk in the local parameter list of a functions documentation?
Thanks to @zware and @eryksun, so from your replies I understand that an asterisk in a function signature precedes the name of a local variable into which a tuple containing any additional positional arguments will be placed - effectively allowing an arbitrary number of positional arguments to be passed into the function.
For a long time, the norm was to put a red asterisk "*" after the field label if the field was required. Now I am observing a shift into replacing the asterisk symbol with the word "(required)" after the label.
The "norm" was never a red asterisks. While many early web pages used an asterisks, it wasn't necessarily red and always required a key someone near the top of the form telling you that "* = required". Some sites did something different. Eventually it did become common enough that most people could realize what it meant, but it was still effectively meaningless without prior knowledge.
Using only asterisk will leave a big portion of users wondering what this means and will look somewhere on the page to see more information because of the asterisk. In books if there is asterisk on some of the words, on the bottom of the page there is additional explanation. My opinion is to avoid using asterisk only!
The asterisk is a commonly used wildcard symbol that broadens a search by finding words that start with the same letters. Use it with distinctive word stems to retrieve variations of a term with less typing.
The asterisk indicates that the part or assembly has been modified and needs to be saved. In your case it looks like they were modified without being first checked out. In this case when you go to check them out it will tell you that the model is NEWER than the data in the Vault, and ask if you want to overwrite it form the Vault. That's up to you, but if you MEANT to keep the changes, don't overwrite from the Vault. Just check them out, save them, and then check back in... if you're done.
Vault decides when to add the red asterisk in the browser. It doesn't matter if the part is opened or changed, when Vault wants it to be red, it becomes red. If you look at it funny, it becomes red. The top level assembly cannot be saved or checked in untill all the red is gone. Sometimes files will randomly and magically become red and "not the current version" and now all of your work cannot be saved until you save the unsavable files which will only save if all the red is gone, which goes away if you save the red file but it wont save because thats why its red. How do you get rid of the red? Well after the 17th failed save attempt you may realize that there is no way to remove the red, and it was programed into there as a sick joke by the software developers who have yet to figure out the meaning of the words "file management." 17dc91bb1f
how to download pizza tower with no steam