Short Summary: In 1816, the Second Bank of the United States was chartered; soon after, in 1818, however, Maryland decided to pass a law that imposed taxes on the bank. James McCulloch, who served as a cashier at the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank, decided not to pay the tax. The state court had ruled that the Bank was unconstitutional, to begin with, and that the federal government did not have the authority to charter a bank
Constitutional Issues: Did Congress have the implied power to create a bank? Could states tax a federal entity/bank?
Holdings and Constitutional Principles: Congress concluded based on the Necessary & Proper Clause that Congress is not limited by its expressed powers. It was decided that through Congress’ implied powers, they had the ability to create a bank. Congress also concluded based on the Supremacy Clause that because the national laws were superior to state laws, the states were not allowed to tax the federal government.
Implied Powers: implied powers expand upon the enumerated powers that are listed in the Constitution. Congress is allowed to borrow money, coin money, and tax expressly by the Constitution. The implied power of creating a national bank allows for the federal government to implement this expressed power.
How did the balance of power between national and state governments change based on interpretations in McCulloch v. Maryland?
Strengthened the authority of the federal government relative to the states. This decision established a broad interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause, expanding federal authority at the expense of state sovereignty because Congress could now enact legislation that is "necessary and proper" to carry out its enumerated powers. The decision placed limits on the ability of states to interfere with federal institutions or policies, reinforcing the supremacy of federal law over state law.