How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
If you want an in-ear, sound-isolating pair with a long total playtime window and a low-latency Bluetooth 5.3 connection for music, calls and workouts, choose Aoslen Earbuds; if you need open-ear clip-on buds that keep you aware of traffic and conversations while staying put through sweat and rain, choose Monster Open Ear AC225.
• Aoslen Earbuds — biggest strength: In-ear sealing design with ANC and four ENC mics, 13mm dynamic drivers, Bluetooth 5.3 with a 15-meter range, and a charging case that adds up to 42 hours of playback.
• Aoslen Earbuds — biggest trade-off: You're sealed in. In-ear tips block outside noise, which is great for focus and terrible for hearing a car, a colleague or a crossing signal.
• Monster Open Ear AC225 — biggest strength: 5.1g-per-bud clip-on open-ear design that sits outside the ear canal, with Bluetooth 6.0, directional audio to limit leakage, and IPX6 water resistance.
• Monster Open Ear AC225 — biggest trade-off: No active noise cancellation at all, and the case charging time is listed at 8 hours, so you'll want to plan your charging around your day.
• Who Aoslen is for: Listeners who want to disappear into their audio — commuters, gym-goers, gamers and anyone who takes a lot of calls in noisy places.
• Who Monster AC225 is for: Runners, cyclists, walkers and office workers who need to stay aware of their surroundings and can't stand things stuffed in their ear canals.
The Aoslen Earbuds are the more conventional product of the two, and they lean hard into that. This is a true in-ear design with a rounded-tip earpiece, three sizes of silicone tips (S/M/L), and a plastic body finished in blue with a matching blue case. The core pitch is isolation plus output: 13mm dynamic drivers, a 20Hz–20,000Hz frequency range, 32-ohm impedance, and active noise cancellation on top of four ENC microphones for calls.
What that combination actually buys you is a private listening bubble. If you work in an open office, ride a noisy train, or take client calls from a coffee shop, the in-ear seal and the mic array are the whole point — the design is built to reduce what gets in and clean up what goes out. The Bluetooth 5.3 chip keeps latency and power draw low, with a stated connection range of up to 15 meters, which is generous enough to leave your phone on a desk or in a gym locker and keep walking. Touch controls handle play/pause, volume, tracks, calls and the voice assistant, and the separate LED display on the case shows each earbud's and the case's charge level — a genuinely useful detail if you hate guessing.
Battery is the other strong card. Aoslen lists roughly 6–7 hours of music per charge (6.5 hours average) and up to 42 hours total with the case, which itself refills in about 1.5 hours over USB-C. The IP rating is a little inconsistent on the sheet — the bullet text says IP7, the spec block says IP6 — so I'd treat it as splash- and sweat-resistant rather than something to swim in.
Monster Open Ear AC225: Who It's For
The Monster Open Ear AC225 is a different philosophy entirely. Each earbud weighs just 5.1g and clips onto the edge of your ear rather than entering the canal, held by an adaptive bridge that's designed to conform to your ear shape. Nothing is plugged, so ambient sound stays with you. Monster also notes the clip-on form works alongside glasses and other accessories — worth knowing if you wear frames all day.
Sound comes from 13mm drivers with dual-composite diaphragms, and Monster's directional audio approach aims the output toward your ear while limiting how much leaks out. That's the honest pitch for open-ear: you get bass and clarity without broadcasting your podcast to the entire bus. It won't match a sealed in-ear design for low-end impact, because physics doesn't allow it, but the design is explicitly chasing privacy through directionality rather than through a plug.
On connectivity, Monster goes further on paper than Aoslen with Bluetooth 6.0, which the sheet describes as rock-solid with ultra-low latency — handy for gaming and video. There's an ENC-enhanced mic for calls, and the headline figure is 8 hours per charge with the case pushing total playtime toward 40 hours (the bullet says 36H, the copy says 40H — treat the range as roughly a full work week of listening). IPX6 covers sweat and rain.
The trade-offs are clear and worth stating plainly. There is no active noise cancellation — the noise control field is simply "None." If you want to mute a plane cabin, this is not the tool. And the case charge time is listed at 8 hours, which is slow; you'll want to top it up overnight rather than in a hurry before you leave. Also note the color: purple, full stop.
Who should buy it: runners, cyclists, walkers, gym-goers and desk workers who want music without sealing off the world. Who should skip it: anyone who wants maximum bass slam, serious noise blocking, or a fast-charging case.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for staying aware of your surroundings → Monster Open Ear AC225. Nothing blocks your ear canal, so traffic, announcements and coworkers come through.
• Best for long total playtime → Aoslen Earbuds. Up to 42 hours with the case versus roughly 36–40 hours on the Monster.
• Best for all-day comfort and glasses wearers → Monster Open Ear AC225. 5.1g per bud and a clip-on bridge beat tip pressure for many people.
• Best for fast case charging → Aoslen Earbuds. About 1.5 hours versus 8 hours listed for the Monster case.
• Best for the newest Bluetooth spec → Monster Open Ear AC225. Bluetooth 6.0 against Aoslen's 5.3.
• Best for call clarity in loud places → Aoslen Earbuds. Four ENC mics versus the Monster's single ENC mic setup.
• Best for workouts where you sweat hard → Monster Open Ear AC225. IPX6 and a design that never sits inside a sweaty ear canal.
In my opinion, the right answer depends on one question: do you want to hear the world or shut it out? If you want to shut it out — for commuting, focused work, gaming or noisy call environments — I would buy the Aoslen Earbuds. The ANC, four-mic array, 13mm drivers, 42-hour case and 1.5-hour recharge make it the more versatile everyday pair. If you run, ride or walk near traffic, I would buy the Monster Open Ear AC225 instead, because no amount of sound quality compensates for not hearing a car behind you. Check the current price on Amazon for both before you commit — the gap between them is what usually settles a close call.
Both are built for exercise, but differently. The Monster AC225 is IPX6 and clips outside the ear, so sweat and rain are less of a problem and you keep hearing traffic. The Aoslen is IP6/IP7-rated in-ear with a secure tipped fit, better for treadmill and gym work where isolation helps.
Do the Monster Open Ear AC225 have noise cancelling?
Aoslen states about 6.5 hours per charge and up to 42 hours with the case, which refills in roughly 1.5 hours. Monster states 8 hours per charge with 36–40 hours total, but the case itself takes about 8 hours to charge. For quick turnaround, Aoslen is the more convenient setup.
That's personal, but the specs point different ways. The Monster AC225 is 5.1g per bud with an adaptive bridge and no ear-canal insertion, which many people find easier for hours at a time and with glasses. The Aoslen uses S/M/L tips, so fit depends on getting the right size — comfortable when dialed in, but in-ear pressure is real.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.