Abstract
We study the asset pricing implications of geopolitical tensions using nearly 100 years of data. Leveraging widely adopted news-based geopolitical risk indices, we find that geopolitical threats (GPT) and acts (GPA) have markedly different effects. GPT aligns closely with geopolitical risk perceptions and decisions of investors and firms. Thus, GPT is priced across individual US stocks, equity anomalies, international equity and bond indices, and it forecasts country-level equity premia. In contrast, GPA exhibits weaker and less stable links to the beliefs and decisions of investors and firms as well as to variation in risk premia across assets and over time. Importantly, our results are incremental to existing news-based indices of macro-financial uncertainty, including those capturing war-related discourse and economic or trade policy risk. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of forward-looking measures like GPT for understanding how news-based uncertainty affects investment decisions and asset prices
Media coverage: Barron's
Conferences: 2027 AFA; 2026 WFA; 2026 EFA; 2026 NFA; 2026 Asian Bureau of Finance and Economic Research (ABFER); 2026 Georgetown Politics in Finance Conference; 2026 FSU Truist Beach Conference; 2026 World Symposium on Investment Research; 2026 ESADE Spring Workshop; 2025 Annual Finance Conference at WashU; 2025 Stanford SITE Conference; 2025 SAFE Asset Pricing Workshop; 2025 Volatility Institute Annual Conference at NYU Shanghai; 2025 International Behavioral Finance Conference at Chicago Booth; 2025 CREDIT in Venice.
(Conferences in bold indicate those I attended or where I presented)
* Finalist for the 2026 ICPM Research Award
When Safe Assets Stop Looking Safe: Global Forces in Sovereign Bond Yields
Abstract
Using historical and high-frequency data for 20 advanced economies, I show that global risk-free rate models capture the secular rise in sovereign yield comovement over the postwar era, but their explanatory power breaks down at long maturities after the Global Financial Crisis. I address this challenge by decomposing sovereign yields into risk-free rates, default spreads, and convenience yields, each with global and local components. The risk-free component remains the dominant global force, while global credit risk emerges as the missing factor behind post-crisis long-rate comovement. Its role is strongest for stressed sovereigns, yet it is only weakly linked to broad U.S. financial indicators, suggesting that global sovereign credit conditions are not simply a reflection of U.S. factors. Convenience yields are also important determinants of yield variation at the country level, but not comovement across countries. Finally, I document a striking erosion in safety premia across the maturity spectrum: convenience yields fall first in the United States and then more broadly across countries after 2024.
Conferences: 2026 MFR Program Summer Session for Young Scholars
(Conferences in bold indicate those I attended or where I presented)
International Government Bond Yields and Global Policy Spillovers