Publications

Articles in international and national peer-reviewed journals

1. Rassili, O.*, MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2023). Does accentual variation in the pronunciation of French words influence their recognition? It depends on the ear of presentation. JASA Express Letters, 2023, 3 (3), pp.035204. (*PhD under my co-supervision). doi: 10.1121/10.0017516.

2.  Champagne-Lavau, M., Moreau, N., Rivoal, L. & MICHELAS, A. (2022). Expressions référentielles et formes prosodiques : quand et comment la prise en compte de notre interlocuteur guide‑t‑elle nos choix linguistiques?. Travaux Interdisciplinaires sur la Parole et le Langage, 38. doi: 10.4000/tipa.4935.

3. Bertrand, R., German, J., Herment, S., Hirst, D., MICHELAS, A. et al. (2022). La prosodie au Laboratoire Parole et Langage : histoire, recherches actuelles et perspectives. Travaux Interdisciplinaires sur la Parole et le Langage, 38. doi: 10.4000/tipa.5210.

4. MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2021). When native contrasts are perceived as non-native: the role of the ear of presentation in the discrimination of accentual contrasts. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33:2, 187-198. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2021.1889569.

5. Fairs, A., MICHELAS, A., Dufour, S. & Strijkers, K. (2021). The Same Ultra-Rapid Parallel Brain Dynamics Underpin the Production and Perception of Speech. Cerebral Cortex Communications, Oxford University Press, 2021, 2(3). doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab040.

6. MICHELAS, A. & German., J.S. (2020). Focus marking and prosodic boundary strength in French. Phonetica, 77:244–267. doi:10.1159/000499071. 

7. Fairs, A., Dmitrieva X., Chanoine, V., Morillon, B., MICHELAS, A., et al. (2020). Does the brain recruit the same word representations across language production and perception? A registered report MEG study. Cortex, Elsevier. 

8. MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2019). Are prosodic variants stored in the French mental lexicon?. Experimental Psychology, 66(6), 393-401. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000462.

9. MICHELAS, A., Cau, C. & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2019). The impact of shared knowledge on speakers’ prosody. PloS one, 14(10), e0223640.

10.  MICHELAS, A., Esteve-Gibert, N. & Dufour, S. (2018). On the French listeners’ ability to use stress during spoken word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30 (2), 198-206. doi:10.1080/20445911.2017.1394862.

11.  MICHELAS, A., Frauenfelder U., Schön, D. & Dufour, S. (2016). How deaf are French speakers to stress?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139, 1333-1342. doi:10.1121/1.4944574.

12.  D’Imperio, M., MICHELAS, A. & Portes, C. (2016). École d’Aix et approches tonales de l’intonation du français : Un aperçu des recherches depuis les années 1970, Langue française, 191 (3/2016), 31-46.

13.  MICHELAS, A., Portes, C. & Champagne-Lavau M. (2015). When pitch accents encode speaker commitment: evidence from French intonation. Language and Speech, 59(2) 266–293. doi: 10.1177/0023830915587337. 

14.  MICHELAS, A., D’Imperio, M. (2015). Prosodic boundary strength guides syntactic parsing of French utterances. Laboratory phonology, 6(1), 119-146. doi: 10.1515/lp-2015-0003.

15.  Portes, C., Beyssade, C., MICHELAS, A., Marandin, J.-M., Champagne-Lavau, M. (2014). The Dialogical Dimension of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from French. Journal of Pragmatics, 74,15-29. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.013.

16.  MICHELAS, A., Faget, C., Portes, C., Lienhart, A.-C.,  Boyer, L., Lançon, C., Champagne-Lavau, M. (2014). Do patients with schizophrenia use prosody to encode contrastive discourse status?. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:755. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00755.  

17.  D’Imperio, M., MICHELAS, A. (2014). Scaling and the internal structuring of the Intonation Phrase in French. Phonology, 31(1), 95-122. doi:10.1017/S0952675714000049.

18.  MICHELAS, A., D’Imperio, M. (2012). When syntax meets prosody: Tonal and duration variability in French Accentual Phrases. Journal of Phonetics, 40(6), 816-829. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2012/08.004. 

Book chapters

D'Imperio, M., German, J., MICHELAS, A. (2012). Multi-level constraint interaction and phrasing in French. In Gorka Elordieta, Pilar Prieto (eds.) Prosody and Meaning, 11-34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Articles in conference proceedings (minimum 4 pages)

1. Rassili, O*. MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2023). To what extent do French listeners perceive differences in accent location within words? An EEG investigation. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Aug 2023, Prague, Czech Republic. (*PhD under my co-supervision)

2. MICHELAS, A. & Dufour. S. (2022). Gradiency vs. categoricity: How French speakers perceive accentual information in their native language?. Speech Prosody 2022, May 2022, Lisbon (Portugal), Portugal.

3. MICHELAS, A. & DUFOUR, S. (2022). Gradiency vs. categoricity: How French speakers perceive accentual information in their native language?. Speech Prosody 2022, Lisbon, Portugal, 362-366. 

4. MICHELAS, A., & Dufour, S. (2020). Does French listeners’ ability to use accentual information at the word level depend on the ear of presentation?. Proc. Interspeech 2020, Shanghai, China, 1615-1619.

5. MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2018). L'information accentuelle est-elle représentée dans le lexique mental des locuteurs du français?. XXXIIe Journées d’Études sur la Parole, Aix-en-Provence, France., 383-391.

6. MICHELAS, A., Cau, C. & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2017). How Does the Absence of Shared Knowledge Between Interlocutors Affect the Production of French Prosodic Forms?. Proc. Interspeech 2017, 3191-3195. doi: 10.21437/Interspeech. 2017-1430.

7. MICHELAS, A., Portes, C. & Champagne-Lavau M. (2013). Intonational contrasts encode speaker's certainty in neutral vs. incredulity declarative questions in French. Proc. Interspeech, Lyon, France, 783-787.

8. MICHELAS, A., D’Imperio, M. (2012). Specific contribution of tonal and duration cues to the syntactic parsing of French. Speech Prosody, Shanghai, China. 

9. MICHELAS, A., Nguyen, N. (2011). Uncovering the effect of imitation on tonal patterns of French Accentual Phrases, Proc. Interspeech 2011, Florence, Italy, 973-976. 

10. MICHELAS, A., D'Imperio, M. (2011). Uncovering the role of the intermediate phrase in the syntactic parsing of French, International Congress of Phonetic Science, Hong Kong, Chine, 1374-1377.  

11. MICHELAS, A., D'Imperio, M. (2010). Indices phonétiques et contraintes phonologiques : caractérisation du syntagme intermédiaire en français. Journées d’Etude sur la Parole, Mons, Belgium, 77-80.  

12.  MICHELAS, A., D'Imperio, M. (2010). Accentual Phrase boundaries and lexical access in French. Speech Prosody, Chicago, United-States, 100882:1-4.  

13.  MICHELAS, A., D'Imperio, M. (2010). Durational cues and prosodic phrasing in French: evidence for the intermediate phrase. Speech Prosody, Chicago, United-States, 100881:1-4.  

14.  D'Imperio, M., MICHELAS, A. (2010). Embedded register levels and prosodic phrasing in French. Speech Prosody, Chicago, United-States, 100879:1-4.  

15.  D'Imperio, M., MICHELAS, A. (2010). Interface entre structure syntaxique et structure prosodique: le syntagme intermédiaire en français. Interfaces, Discours & Prosodie, Paris, 145-156.  

Communications in international conferences (other than communications with proceedings)    

1. MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2023). Does a mismatch on accentual cues affect the magnitude of the short-term repetition priming effect? an ERP investigation in French. Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Sep 2023, Porto, Portugal.

2. Rassili, O.*, MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2023). To what extent do French listeners perceive word accentuation? An EEG investigation. The Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language, Oct 2023, Marseille, France. (*PhD under my co-supervision)

3. Fairs, A., Dmitrieva, X., Chanoire, V.,  Morillon B., MICHELAS, A. et al.. (2021). Does the brain recruit the same word representations across language behaviours? A Registered Report MEG study of language production versus perception. AMLaP, Sept 2021, Paris, France.

4. Fairs, A.,  Strijkers, K., MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2020). Evidence for simultaneous lexical and sublexical access in production and perception & roles of item variation. LiveMEEG, Oct 2020, Aix-en-Provence, France. 

5. Fairs, A., Dmitrieva, X., Chanoire, V.,  Morillon B., MICHELAS, A. et al.. (2020). Does the brain recruit the same word representations across language behaviours? A Registered Report MEG study of language production versus perception. Twelfth Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language, Oct 2020, San Sebastián, Spain. 

6. MICHELAS, A. & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2019). To what extent the French prosodic encoding of contrast is addressee-oriented?. Phonetics and Phonology in Europe, Juil 2019, Lecce, Italy. 

7. MICHELAS, A. & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2018). Does the addressee matter when producing French prosodic focus marking?. Workshop on Prosody and Meaning: Information Structure and Beyond, Nov 2018, Aix-en-Provence, France.  

8. MICHELAS, A. & Dufour S. (2018). Final stress is not represented in the French speakers’ mental lexicon. International Conference on Tone and intonation TIE 2018, Oct 2018, Göteborg, Sweden.

9. Champagne-Lavau, M., MICHELAS, A., Faget, C., Grellou, M. & Lançon, C. (2018). Est-ce que des patients atteints de schizophrénie s'adaptent à leur interlocuteur durant une conversation?. Le 16e Congrès de l'Encéphale, Jan 2018, Paris, France.  

10. MICHELAS, A. & Dufour, S. (2016). On the French listeners' ability to use stress during spoken word recognition. International Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Grenada, Spain, 5-8 May 2016. 

11. MICHELAS, A., Frauenfelder U.H., Schön, D. & Dufour, S. (2015). How deaf are French speakers to stress?. The 19th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Paphos, Chypre, 17-20 Septembre.    

12. Champagne-Lavau, M., MICHELAS, A, Faget, C., Portes, C., Lienhart, A.S., Boyer, L., & Lançon, C. (2014). Do patients with schizophrenia use prosodic focus marking to attribute mental states in a conversation situation ? Schizophrenia Research, 153, p.S220. [Poster presented at the 4th Schizophrenia International Research Society Conference,  5-9 April 2014, Florence, Italy].

13. MICHELAS, A., Lienhart, A., Faget, C., Portes, C., Boyer, L., Lançon, C., Champagne-Lavau, M. (2013). Relationship between theory of mind and intonational focus marking in French: Results from schizophrenia. Architecture and mechanisms for language processing (AMLaP), Marseille, France, 2-4 September 2013.

14. Portes, C., Beyssade, C., Bertrand, R., Espesser, R., Marandin, J.M, MICHELAS, A. &  Champagne-Lavau, M. (2013). Disentangling French intonational contours through specific utterance reactions in adjacent pairs. 19ème Congrès International des Linguistes, Geneva, 22-27 July 2013.   

15. Portes, C., Beyssade, C., MICHELAS, A., Marandin, J.M, & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2013). Intonational Meaning involves attribution of intentions : the case of French. Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia, Lisbon, Portugal, 25-26 June 2013.

16. German, J., MICHELAS, A. (2012). How many levels in French? Focus marking as evidence for prosodic hierarchy. Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology 2012, 3-5 October 2012.

17. MICHELAS, A., German, J. (2012). Prosodic boundary strength and focus marking in French: the need of a minimal intermediate phrase boundary at the right edge of focus regions. Tone and Intonation in Europe (TIE5), Oxford, UK, 3-5 September 2012. 

18. MICHELAS, A., D'Imperio, M. (2011). The role of prosody on the syntactic parsing of speech: from level of prosodic boundaries to depth of syntactic breaks. Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia, Tarragona, Spain, 21-23 June 2011.  

19.  MICHELAS, A., D'Imperio, M. (2010). Syntactic and Length effect on French Prosodic Phrasing. Tone and Intonation in Europe (TIE4), Stockholm, Sweden, 9-11 September 2010.  

20. MICHELAS, A., D'Imperio, M. (2010). Phonetic cues and phonological constraints in prosodic unit definition: evidence for the intermediate phrase in French. Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Albuquerque, New Mexico, NM , 8-10 July 2010.

21. D'Imperio, M., MICHELAS, A. (2009). Mapping syntax onto prosodic structure: evidence for the intermediate phrase in French. Interfaces Discours & Prosodie, Paris, France, 9-11 Septembre.  

22. MICHELAS, A., D’Imperio, M. (2009). Is there an Intermediate Phrase in French?. Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 17-18 juin 2009. 

23. D'Imperio, M., MICHELAS, A., Pynte, J. (2008). Can accentual phrase boundaries remove temporary lexical ambiguity in French?. Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 13-15 mars. 

24. D'Imperio, M., MICHELAS, A., Pynte, J. (2008). Can accentual phrase boundaries influence lexical access in French?. Experimental and Theoretical Advances in Prosody: Conference on Prosody and Language Processing, Ithaca, New-York, NY, 11-13 April 2008.