Through an analysis of The Alligator newspaper in the research of our group, interesting insights into the development of women’s rights at the University of Florida may be discovered. While the overall project focuses on the overall protracted nature of social change at the University of Florida, this individual project seeks to specifically examine the development of women’s rights at the University of Florida and other universities. The scope of this project is intended to be more focused on the specific aspects of women’s rights that have been highlighted in The Alligator newspaper through the use of word frequency counters. This individual project will focus that goal on an analysis of women’s rights, particularly on the subjects of integration of women into the University as well as the subject of abortion. Moreover, while the individual project covers an aspect of the larger group project, it seeks to dive deeper into the subject and discuss it and the important events that led to its protracted nature and contextualize them in the broader social development in American universities, as well as show the extent that these events shaped The Alligator newspaper itself.
The project will incorporate secondary literature discussing women’s rights in college education, referencing specific events that specifically highlight an impact in the University of Florida or other universities. It will also use specific articles found in The Alligator to examine the exact events that led to increased word usage to analyze further how these events affected the University of Florida, the broader scope of American colleges, and even The Alligator itself. Because of the lack of secondary literature for these topics focused specifically on the University of Florida, most of this type of literature will focus on other universities, relating them back to the University of Florida. The cited articles from The Alligator newspaper will prove to provide evidence towards particular explanations of the rise in specific word usage in a year.
The project uses the same program that the wider-scope group project utilizes, however, here it is particularly used to examine the use of terms relating to women’s rights. This program helped analyze the word frequency of the related terms as it saved a considerable amount of manual labor. As the document, Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian's Macroscope, states about a similar project, “Computers can read this amount of information quickly, but it would take years for a single scholar to read this (and then they probably would have forgotten half of what they had read).” (Graham, Milligan, Weingart, 17) Most of the graphs created from the program are unique to this project, however, analyzing the graph of the use of women’s rights over time which was also featured in the group project is essential to the scope of this individual project, as this use of the Python program allowed for the studying of specific spikes and their subsequent causes. The data gathered from The Alligator is used throughout this project to quantify the popularity of terms throughout time, which is then focused on through an analysis of literature that references events that may have caused spikes in word usage in certain years.
The analysis of the subject of this individual project begins by examining the overall trends of the phrase “women’s rights” in the data collected from The Alligator over time (Fig 1). This allows us to examine the overall peaks and dips of the use of the phrase over time. As many entries in the 1980s are unable to be accessed, zooming in to a time range including the issues of The Alligator from 1940 to 1980 benefits the accuracy, as well as clarity of the analysis. Provided on the graph are labels of events that occurred in the struggle for women’s rights in America in the years respective to the highest peaks shown in the data for the searched phrase (Fig 2). This range in time is also ideal as it includes years that are extremely important to social change at universities and in America as a whole. By having this macroscopic view of the protracted development of women’s rights, we can analyze the specific instances that may have led to a word count increase and then perform further data analysis based on terms related to those specific events. The events that are covered in this project include the push towards coeducation at the university in the mid to late 1940s, the events that led to the newspaper's reorganization as independent, and the passing of Roe v. Wade in 1973 (Fig 3). Through an analysis of these events, the scope of this project becomes more focused on the decades of 1940 to 1980.
(Fig 1) As much of the data present throughout the 1980s has been unable to be accessed, zooming in on a smaller data sample will allow conclusions made on the data to be more accurate as well as focused on a smaller set of years.
(Fig 2) This "zoomed-in" version of the data allows the project to become more focused on specific events and their impact on the protracted development of women's rights throughout the 1900s.
(Fig 3) This graph shows the main two focuses of the project, abortion, and coeducation over time.
(Fig 4) After "zooming in" on the relevant years it is clear that the years between 1940 and 1950 in particular have a higher rate of use of the term "coeducation", illustrating how this was a hot-button topic at the time.
The development of coeducation at the University of Florida was born out of the massive increase in university attendance following the passing of the GI Bill after the Second World War. As Taylor states in the article, A History of Race and Gender at the University of Florida Levin College of Law 1909-2001, “The male population at the University of Florida overflowed the facilities in Gainesville and when no more men could be accommodated they were redirected to Florida State College for Women in Tallahassee … In 1947 the Legislature legalized the coeducation of men and women in both institutions…” (Taylor, 498) This sentiment is reflected in an analysis of the word count data for the use of the word “coeducation.” This can be seen on the graph to the left (Fig 4) as it shows a sharp increase in the popularity of the term postwar.
As the subject of women entering the university became popular, policies around the university began to change themselves as well. As Clawson states in the article, Queers on campus: LGBTQ student visibility at three public universities in Florida, 1970-1985, “The Dean of Men office at UF was established in 1920, followed by the Dean of Women office in 1948, when UF began to admit women to the undergraduate division… The Dean of Women office also handled rules that applied only to female students, including curfews and dress codes.” (Clawson, 89) This literature specifically shows the distinct amount of change that occurred at the University of Florida just following the beginning of women’s integration into the university. This same protracted process can be seen throughout other American universities during this period.
As Schwartz states in the article Reconceptualizing the Leadership Roles of Women in Higher Education: A Brief History on the Importance of Deans of Women, “As the enrollment of women increased during the late nineteenth century, many college presidents began to appoint female faculty members to advise, assist, and counsel the new ‘minority’ population on campus, female students.” (Schwartz, 3) This source discusses the effect of the beginning of the integration of women into American universities which similarly to the University of Florida, also had Deans of Women who took active roles in the shaping of the universities they were employed at. This shows a clear relationship between the increased word count of the topic in The Alligator newspaper and the nationwide development of women’s rights during the same time period.
When analyzing the subject of women’s rights in The Alligator newspaper, the subject of abortion raises itself as one of particular significance. After examining the general data from the analysis of the phrase “women’s rights”, there is a clear peak in the early 1970s (Fig 5). After conducting the same search using the term “abortion” a sharp rise in the same years is clearly present. The sharp increase in the word count related to this term can be attributed to multiple events that occurred during the beginning of the 1970s. This is shown in the visualization of the data surrounding the term abortion, present on the right. In order to examine this subject further, an analysis of the newspaper itself can lead to one of the other intentions of the project, analyzing the effect that events on the subject of the change in women’s rights over time had on The Alligator newspaper. This is best seen through an analysis of the subject of abortion and its presence in the newspaper.
One of the main contributing factors to the increase in the use of the term “abortion” has to do with both the state of Florida’s rescinding of the state’s previously held abortion law in 1972 as well as the passing of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision in the subsequent year. Most of the word usage in The Alligator of this term was done in 1972, so it would be safe to assume that this was mainly related to the legal discussion of abortion in the scope of the previously held Florida law. Connecting the terms “law” and “abortion” shows a clear connection between the rapid increase in word usage between the two terms. The graphs of the related word counts for the data demonstrate this (Fig 6). This leads one to believe the reason for the increase in 1972 was due to the rescinding of the abortion law in Florida.
As previously mentioned, analyzing articles of the newspaper itself is the best-suited method of research for this subject in order to connect the subject to literature which furthers one of the main goals of the project. An article released on January 7, 1972, discusses this controversy and its relation to the former UF president O’Connell’s upholding of lower court decisions, but refusal to uphold one in particular “But in January 1972, a lower court decision suddenly found itself out in the cold. Alachua County Felony Court of Record Judge Benmont Tench’s ruling that both statutes 797.01 and 797.02 if the Florida abortion law were unconstitutional was no longer enough for O’Connell.” (Alligator, 1972) This quote captures the animosity present throughout the University concerning the subject of abortion during this period.
Regarding the subject of abortion’s effect on The Alligator newspaper, the best and easiest to discern the result is the change of the paper to The Independent Florida Alligator. This arose due to the previously mentioned controversy surrounding the former President of the University Stephen C. O’Connell and his disagreement with the publishing of a list of names of abortion clinics. The graph on the right shows a connection between the terms “abortion” and “independent” showing the popularity spike of “independent” during this time (Fig 7). Causing an entire schism in the structure of the newspaper, abortion is clearly shown to be one of the most major topics in the social development of women’s rights.
(Fig 5) The graph shows a rapid and sharp increase in the use of the word "abortion" in the early 1970s. This could represent multiple factors including the rescinding of Florida's previous abortion law, the passing of Roe v. Wade, or the creation of The Independent Florida Alligator.
(Fig 6) This graph represents the word usage of the terms "abortion" and "law" over time. It suggests a link between the two possibly referring to Florida's abortion law that was struck down.
(Fig 7) The graph shows the relationship between the terms "abortion" and "independent" over time. This shows a direct correlation between the two, likely due to the reason of abortion being a cause for the creation of The Independent Florida Alligator.
By analyzing more deeply the factors present in the social development of women’s rights at the University of Florida, one can answer the questions discussed at the beginning of the project. Through analyzing the word frequency of specific terms related to women’s rights, one can see a protracted development that was present nationwide throughout universities, as well as one that deeply affected The Alligator newspaper itself.
Clawson, Jessica. "Queers on Campus: LGBTQ Student Visibility at Three Public Universities in Florida, 1970-1985." Order No. 3716833, University of Florida, 2014. https://login.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/queers-on-campus-lgbtq-student-visibility-at/docview/1710075742/se-2.
Graham, Shaun, Ian Milligan, Scott Weingart, and Kimberley Martin. Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian's Macroscope. Singapore: World Scientific, 2022.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200618171130/http://www.themacroscope.org/?page_id=584.
Schwartz, Robert A. “Reconceptualizing the Leadership Roles of Women in Higher Education: A Brief History on the Importance of Deans of Women.” The Journal of Higher Education 68, no. 5 (1997): 502–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2959944.
Taylor, Betty W. “A History of Race and Gender at the University of Florida Levin College of Law 1909-2001.” Fla. L. Rev. 54 no. 495 (2002): 495-520. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/faculty/pub/365
University of Florida. The Florida Alligator. Distributed by The University of Florida Digital Collections. https://ufdc.ufl.edu/title-sets/UF00028291.
University of Florida. The Independent Florida Alligator. Distributed by The University of Florida Digital Collections. https://ufdc.ufl.edu/title-sets/UF00028290.