There are three types of surveillance systems that may be used to detect ADRs:
1. Prospective
2. Concurrent
3. Retrospective
Identifying which methods to use will depend on the unique characteristics of a facility. However, ADRs are more likely to be detected when a combination of surveillance systems are used. It should be noted that the success of any surveillance system depends on the willing participation of healthcare professionals in reporting ADRs.
PROSPECTIVE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
Prospective surveillance occurs prior to initiation of medication therapy and can be accomplished in two ways:
1. Monitoring of patients who are at a high risk for experiencing ADRs—Risk factors for ADRs include the following:
• Polypharmacy
• Extremes of age (e.g., neonatal, pediatric, and geriatric patients)
• Presence of concurrent disease states (e.g., impaired renal or hepatic function)
• Severity of illness
• History of allergy/previous ADR
• Pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic changes
2. Monitoring of patients who are receiving medications known to have a high potential for causing ADRs—The drug classes most frequently implicated in ADRs include the following:
• Anticoagulants (e.g., heparin, warfarin etc)
• Antimicrobials (e.g., penicillins, cephalosporins, sulfonamides, aminoglycosides etc)
• Anti-Cancer agents
• Cardiac agents (e.g., antiarrhythmics, digoxin, diuretics, antihypertensives etc )
• Central nervous system (CNS) agents (e.g., analgesics, anticonvulsants, sedatives/ hypnotics etc)
• Diagnostic agents (e.g., contrast media)
• Antidiabetics (including insulin)
• Corticosteroids
CONCURRENT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
Concurrent surveillance involves the identification of ADRs close to the time they occur. There are several methods that can be used to detect ADRs concurrently:
• Spontaneous reporting of ADRs by primary care practitioners (such as physicians and nurses) during the course of their work using telephone hotlines, ADR alert cards, report forms, etc.
• Analysis of medication usage evaluation (MUE) studies
• Reporting of suspected ADRs by hospital utilization review/quality assurance personnel from their concurrent review of patient charts
• Monitoring of orders and patient charts by pharmacy personnel for clues (often called triggers) that an ADR has occurred
• Concurrent surveillance has the advantage of allowing a more thorough investigation because the patient, nurse, and physician are available for interviews and are likely to recollect events more accurately. Also, this method allows interventions and management of the ADR to take place in a timely manner.
RETROSPECTIVE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
Retrospective surveillance involves the review of medical records for adverse drug reactions. It is not a desirable approach to monitor ADRs because of the disadvantages inherent in utilizing retrospective data. These disadvantages include
· Inadequate documentation of events on medical records and
· The inability to intervene.
Signs and symptoms of ADRs are many and varied and may be similar to signs and symptoms of disease states or medical conditions. Table below contains some of the common signs and symptoms of ADRs (grouped by body systems) that may be seen in patients during routine observation and assessment. Please note that the list is not complete.
A trigger is defined as an occurrence, prompt or flag found on review of the medical record that “triggers “further investigation to determine the presence or absence of an adverse event”. A trigger may include laboratory trigger, medical trigger and clinician trigger.
Triggers include the following:
• Abnormal test results such as serum drug concentrations above therapeutic levels and laboratory test results outside a particular range or threshold (e.g., platelet count less than 50,000)
• Alerting order, which is an order or sequence of orders that suggests an adverse effect may have taken place
Alerting orders include the sudden discontinuation of one or more medications, an unexpected reduction in dosage, and a stat order for an antidote or other medication used to manage ADRs, such as the following:
Atropine
Phytonadione (vitamin K)
Benzotropine
Potassium chloride
Dextrose 50%
Flumazenil
Glucagon
Protamine
Naloxone
Nitroglycerin
Diphenhydramine
Physostigmine
Epinephrine
Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS)
Furosemide
Antidiarrheals
Antiemetics
Glucocorticosteroids
Alerting orders also include non-routine orders for laboratory tests, such as the following:
BUN
Serum creatinine
AST,ALT
Urine protein, cells, casts
PT,PTT, Platelet count
Drug serum concentration
Clostridium difficile
Once an ADR is suspected through an alerting order or other means of surveillance, an investigation is conducted to evaluate causality and assess the probability of a reaction using standardized criteria and an algorithm developed for objectively rating potential ADRs.
Evaluation of causality determines the medication(s) suspected of causing the ADR. Assessment of the probability of a medication causing an ADR depends on evaluation of six criteria:
1. Event is a documented, known response to the suspected agent
2. Event is not explained by the disease state
3. Timing of events
4. Dechallenge (discontinuing suspected agent)
5. Rechallenge (resuming suspected agent)
A systematic approach to the assessment of ADR provides the necessary data needed for researching the literature. The following questions formulate such a systematic approach:
For what condition the patient is being treated?
Does the patient have H/o any allergy?
What medication(s) is/ are being taken by the patient?
What is/are the dose(s) and duration of each medication?
When was each medication started?
Which medication(s) is/are suspected to be causing the ADR?
Has/have the suspected medication(s) been discontinued?
What is/are the symptom(s) of the ADR?
When did the symptom(s) appear?
What is the severity of the symptoms (mild/moderate/severe)?
What are the results of any relevant laboratory tests?
Did the symptom(s) decrease or subside following discontinuation of the suspected medication?
Any treatment was provided to the patient for management of the suspected ADR, if so what?
What is the present status of the ADR (Recovered/Recovering/Not recovered/Expired/Not known)?
Provide if there is/are any relevant data on liver and/or renal functions of the patient?