For swimming, the Angry miao CYBERBLADE is my pick among active noise cancelling earbuds for swimming because it pairs ANC with IPX4 water resistance. SIAWAG is the runner-up if you want a stated IPX5 rating and long claimed total playback, though neither sheet establishes suitability for submersion.
For swimming, the Angry miao CYBERBLADE is my pick among active noise cancelling earbuds for swimming because it pairs ANC with IPX4 water resistance. SIAWAG is the runner-up if you want a stated IPX5 rating and long claimed total playback, though neither sheet establishes suitability for submersion.
• Angry miao CYBERBLADE — best for gaming and music near water; pick this if you want hybrid ANC, transparency mode, and the listed IPX4 resistance.
• SIAWAG Earbuds 5.4 — best for workouts and long listening sessions; pick this if IPX5 splash resistance and a stated 100-hour total playtime matter most.
• XIAOMI Redmi Buds 4 — best for adaptable noise control and calls; pick this if adjustable ANC and transparency modes matter more than a water-resistance rating.
The CYBERBLADE is an in-ear wireless gaming set that combines active noise cancellation with low-latency audio features. It is built around play on devices such as a PC, PlayStation consoles, Switch, Steam Deck, tablets, and phones. Its gaming focus is useful for someone who wants earbuds for more than a phone playlist, while ANC and transparency mode give it options for different listening situations.
The stated 36-millisecond latency is intended to keep game audio closely aligned with on-screen action. That may appeal during fast-paced games, where delayed sound can make play feel less immediate. The product also offers three sound boosters for gaming, movies, and music, and its app can be used for customization and firmware updates. These are meaningful extras for someone who plans to use the earbuds at a desk as well as away from it.
For everyday calls, six microphones and dual-microphone AI environmental noise cancellation are designed to help manage background sound. Hybrid ANC is specified to filter out more than 35 dB, and transparency mode lets outside sound through when awareness matters. The package includes seven pairs of eartips across liquid silicone and memory foam, giving a buyer options to adjust the fit. Battery life is listed as six hours per charge, with a two-hour charging time.
The water detail needs careful interpretation. The product information lists IPX4 resistance, but that is not a claim that the earbuds can be submerged or used underwater. I would not treat them as swim headphones just because they have ANC and some water resistance. They are a stronger fit for gaming, commuting, or general listening where splashes may be a concern than for swimming laps.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Who should skip this: Skip them if you need earbuds explicitly rated for underwater use or want a longer stated playback time per charge.
SIAWAG’s earbuds are a general-purpose in-ear wireless set aimed at listening, calls, and exercise. Bluetooth 5.4 supports automatic reconnection after initial pairing, and the listed wireless range is up to 10 metres. Multipoint pairing lets the earbuds connect to two devices at once, which can make switching between a laptop call and phone audio more convenient. Touch controls cover routine playback and call actions.
The product’s water specification is IPX5, described as protection against water splashes and sweat. That makes it the clearest of these three options for workouts where sweat or splashes are part of the setting, but the sheet does not claim that it is suitable for submersion or swimming. A water-resistance rating is not the same as an underwater-use rating. For pool use, I would look for an explicit swimming or submersion claim rather than infer one from IPX5.
SIAWAG lists ANC for reducing noise and ENC for helping limit background chatter on calls. Four microphones are provided for voice capture. Its claimed battery figures are up to eight hours from one earbud charge and up to 100 hours total with the charging case. The case and earbuds have separate charging details: the case is listed as taking 1.5 hours, while the earbuds are listed as taking less than an hour. Those figures may be useful to someone who wants fewer charging interruptions, though actual listening time can vary with use.
The 60-millisecond latency figure gives this pair some gaming flexibility, but it is not positioned as a specialist gaming set in the same way as the CYBERBLADE. The case is described as pocket-sized, and each earbud is listed at 3 grams. I see the strongest case for these as everyday exercise earbuds with multipoint convenience and a long stated combined battery figure—not as confirmed swimming earbuds.
Who should skip this: Skip them if you need a product explicitly specified for underwater use, or if you want detailed adaptive ANC modes rather than general noise cancellation.
The Xiaomi Redmi Buds 4 Pro are wireless in-ear earbuds designed for music, calls, and general listening. Their standout feature is ANC with three levels—light, balanced, and deep—along with standard transparency and an enhanced-voice option. This gives listeners a choice between reducing outside sound and hearing nearby surroundings without taking the earbuds out. That flexibility suits commutes, indoor work, and moments when a conversation interrupts listening.
The audio setup uses two dynamic drivers in each earbud: a 10 mm aluminium alloy diaphragm and a 6 mm titanium diaphragm for treble frequencies. The listed support for LDAC and high-resolution wireless audio may interest someone who cares about audio formats and compatible playback devices. Xiaomi also describes an immersive audio system designed to create a more spatial presentation when watching video. Those features make this pair more focused on varied listening than on gaming latency.
For calls, each earbud has three microphones, with a noise-reduction system intended to separate voice from surrounding sound. Wind-noise reduction is also listed for outdoor use, which could be useful when walking or running in breezy conditions. Total battery life is stated as up to 36 hours. Bluetooth 5.3 and a listed range of up to 10 metres cover routine wireless listening, while dual-device connectivity is described in the product information.
The main limitation for this guide is that the supplied specifications do not state any water-resistance rating. That does not prove the earbuds cannot tolerate incidental moisture; it means there is no listed rating here on which I would base a swimming recommendation. Their ANC and sound features may be attractive for land-based listening, but I would not choose them for pool use without a clear water-use specification.
Who should skip this: Skip them if water resistance is essential, or if your priority is a dedicated low-latency gaming feature.
I compared the listed design, connectivity, noise-control, battery, and water-resistance details, focusing on what they do and do not establish for swimming. The ranking is my independent editorial opinion based on those published specifications and features. No brand paid for placement.
First, separate splash resistance from swimming suitability. IPX4 and IPX5 describe water-resistance levels, but the supplied descriptions do not establish that either set is designed for underwater listening. None of these product sheets explicitly claims submersion use. If you plan to wear earbuds in a pool, I would look for a clear manufacturer specification for swimming rather than treating an ANC feature or splash rating as proof.
Also consider how you will listen. Bluetooth is convenient for everyday use, but the data here does not explain underwater connectivity performance. The phrase “best bluetooth headset for swimming” captures a common shopping goal, but Bluetooth alone does not answer whether a device is intended for use underwater. Similarly, shoppers searching for “over ear headphones for swimming” or the “best open ear earbuds for swimming” should compare designs and water-use claims rather than assume a different fit style solves the submersion question.
For dry-land use around a pool or after a workout, the trade-offs are easier to compare. The CYBERBLADE emphasizes gaming latency, ANC, and multiple eartip options, with six hours of listed battery life per charge. SIAWAG emphasizes IPX5 splash resistance, multipoint pairing, and a much longer stated combined battery figure. Xiaomi offers adjustable ANC, transparency options, and detailed audio features, but its sheet does not provide a water-resistance rating. Decide which features you will use most, and do not let a high noise-cancellation figure substitute for a water-use specification.
None of these product sheets explicitly says the earbuds are designed for swimming or underwater use. The CYBERBLADE lists IPX4 resistance and SIAWAG lists IPX5, but those details alone do not establish suitability for submersion.
The Angry miao CYBERBLADE lists IPX4 water resistance, while SIAWAG lists IPX5 and describes resistance to splashes and sweat. The Xiaomi Redmi Buds 4 sheet provided here does not state a water-resistance rating.
SIAWAG lists up to 100 hours total with its case, including up to eight hours per earbud charge. Xiaomi lists up to 36 hours total, and the CYBERBLADE lists six hours of average life.
No. ANC is a noise-control feature, not a water-use rating. For swimming, look for an explicit specification that addresses underwater use; the noise-cancellation details in these sheets do not provide that assurance.
• itayak Behind vs Baseus Bowie Series Open: Wrap Around
• Xmenha Sleeping Sleep Mini vs Hulaed Invisible Sleep Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.